Author

Topic: Weeklyponzi made ~60 BTC from fees? (Read 843 times)

hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 510
January 21, 2015, 05:28:06 AM
#19
60 btc of his own money yes. He (most certainly) invested several hundred BTC to earn from others' deposits, and also took fees from this.

It might not always be true. All deposits have a risk. Its hard to know when do you get paid, as that completely depends on deposits coming in the future.
Once you deposit , then you have to wait for more people to deposit. Depositing a big amount in the start also might not help, as people investing after that, will not tend to invest due to the already high amount invested.
However, if a lot of activity happens during a time frame, then that might be a time he might have invested.

So if the game isn't salted at the start and later the operator feeds the Ponzi, I bet most players would like that.    However that would be very high risk and just collecting the fat fees is low risk.   
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 104
January 21, 2015, 05:19:47 AM
#18
60 btc of his own money yes. He (most certainly) invested several hundred BTC to earn from others' deposits, and also took fees from this.

It might not always be true. All deposits have a risk. Its hard to know when do you get paid, as that completely depends on deposits coming in the future.
Once you deposit , then you have to wait for more people to deposit. Depositing a big amount in the start also might not help, as people investing after that, will not tend to invest due to the already high amount invested.
However, if a lot of activity happens during a time frame, then that might be a time he might have invested.
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 510
January 21, 2015, 05:13:01 AM
#17
60 btc of his own money yes. He (most certainly) invested several hundred BTC to earn from others' deposits, and also took fees from this.

 Huh

Do you have any proof of that?   There seems to be a lot of proof that he isn't doing that.  The blockchain clearly shows deposits coming in from many different locations, that would be hard for the operator to fake.   Besides if he invested that much he would have most certainly also lost a bunch.   
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 104
January 21, 2015, 04:40:31 AM
#16
Yeah, looks like they had incredible luck with their ponzis. Most of the ponzis happened in the past haven't exceeded 50 BTC.
700 BTC was a crazy big amount for a ponzi.

That's because the others only intended to scam.

Well, thats not always true. Some ponzis, just payout in the start then scam later. Seems there is a ponzi season every year on btctalk. They were the first ones to start in this season, probably why they had so much interest.
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049
┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴
January 21, 2015, 04:31:39 AM
#15
60 btc of his own money yes. He (most certainly) invested several hundred BTC to earn from others' deposits, and also took fees from this.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
January 21, 2015, 04:25:17 AM
#14
Yeah, looks like they had incredible luck with their ponzis. Most of the ponzis happened in the past haven't exceeded 50 BTC.
700 BTC was a crazy big amount for a ponzi.

That's because the others only intended to scam.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 104
January 21, 2015, 04:18:32 AM
#13
Yeah, looks like they had incredible luck with their ponzis. Most of the ponzis happened in the past haven't exceeded 50 BTC.
700 BTC was a crazy big amount for a ponzi.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
January 21, 2015, 03:49:22 AM
#12
this is what i call smart ponzi operator

basically other ponzi operator scam a small amount of btc

this one dont do that and instead keep running his game , stating risk for people, and only take fees, and boom 60~ btc to his wallet - 20 btc = 40~ btc so far

Well, smart guy indeed. This is why I think a transparent ponzi game would have some chance for long(er) term survival.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
January 21, 2015, 03:37:52 AM
#11
this is what i call smart ponzi operator

basically other ponzi operator scam a small amount of btc

this one dont do that and instead keep running his game , stating risk for people, and only take fees, and boom 60~ btc to his wallet - 20 btc = 40~ btc so far
hero member
Activity: 764
Merit: 500
I'm a cynic, I'm a quaint
January 21, 2015, 03:28:27 AM
#10

It seems fucking crazy, ppl can be rich if they are scammers, oh this is a shit world Shocked

Yes, people can be rich if they're scammers. However, that's not the case with WeeklyPonzi as I am not rich, nor am I a scammer.

You are ban evading. Now, I'm ok with you wanting to refute the scam accusation in your own thread (mods may not be!) but you should really limit it to that, if at all.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
January 21, 2015, 03:26:37 AM
#9
60 btc ??  Shocked
and only with fees ?
it's incredible ..
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
January 21, 2015, 03:17:50 AM
#8

It seems fucking crazy, ppl can be rich if they are scammers, oh this is a shit world Shocked

Yes, people can be rich if they're scammers. However, that's not the case with WeeklyPonzi as I am not rich, nor am I a scammer.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
January 21, 2015, 03:00:36 AM
#7
Current addresses on website:
https://blockchain.info/address/1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk
https://blockchain.info/address/124hrKamS1ZQpEXQ3bPkrjp6KDKxspMfXp

Respective fees address:
https://blockchain.info/address/1FeespcqD5HpJ38HzsmDqwxaTxpZBs57P4  Total Received   59.21465542 BTC
https://blockchain.info/address/1FeesQ8Nfii6SmXrkvBXP5iqUm5T6dztz  Total Received   19.65123202 BTC

Total = ~80BTC

Or

5% * 915.185 = 45.75925
5% * 303.827 = 15.19135

Total = ~60BTC


It seems fucking crazy, ppl can be rich if they are scammers, oh this is a shit world Shocked
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 4554
Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing
January 21, 2015, 02:42:18 AM
#6
all the ponzis are trash lately. seems a bunch of noob accts also
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 510
January 21, 2015, 02:32:20 AM
#5
Current addresses on website:
https://blockchain.info/address/1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk
https://blockchain.info/address/124hrKamS1ZQpEXQ3bPkrjp6KDKxspMfXp

Respective fees address:
https://blockchain.info/address/1FeespcqD5HpJ38HzsmDqwxaTxpZBs57P4  Total Received   59.21465542 BTC
https://blockchain.info/address/1FeesQ8Nfii6SmXrkvBXP5iqUm5T6dztz  Total Received   19.65123202 BTC

Total = ~80BTC

Or

5% * 915.185 = 45.75925
5% * 303.827 = 15.19135

Total = ~60BTC



5% from the payout , so you could say its about 6.5% ? i think

It is 6.5% of the deposits.  Also they keep whatever is left over that didn't payout.   The operator did put 20 BTC back into the second weekly game because his script overpaid early players.  The script sent out double and triple payments cost the game over 60 BTC.   

I think it is very unlikely the site is playing their own games, it is just to risky when you are pulling in good returns.   There is some chance on a weekly game as the risk at the beginning is probably lower but probably zero chance on the daily games. 
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
January 21, 2015, 01:55:26 AM
#4
and they cant even pay out  Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
January 21, 2015, 01:32:19 AM
#3
Current addresses on website:
https://blockchain.info/address/1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk
https://blockchain.info/address/124hrKamS1ZQpEXQ3bPkrjp6KDKxspMfXp

Respective fees address:
https://blockchain.info/address/1FeespcqD5HpJ38HzsmDqwxaTxpZBs57P4  Total Received   59.21465542 BTC
https://blockchain.info/address/1FeesQ8Nfii6SmXrkvBXP5iqUm5T6dztz  Total Received   19.65123202 BTC

Total = ~80BTC

Or

5% * 915.185 = 45.75925
5% * 303.827 = 15.19135

Total = ~60BTC



5% from the payout , so you could say its about 6.5% ? i think
hero member
Activity: 764
Merit: 500
I'm a cynic, I'm a quaint
January 21, 2015, 01:32:02 AM
#2
Current addresses on website:
https://blockchain.info/address/1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk
https://blockchain.info/address/124hrKamS1ZQpEXQ3bPkrjp6KDKxspMfXp

Respective fees address:
https://blockchain.info/address/1FeespcqD5HpJ38HzsmDqwxaTxpZBs57P4  Total Received   59.21465542 BTC
https://blockchain.info/address/1FeesQ8Nfii6SmXrkvBXP5iqUm5T6dztz  Total Received   19.65123202 BTC

Total = ~80BTC

Or

5% * 915.185 = 45.75925
5% * 303.827 = 15.19135

Total = ~60BTC



The obvious answer is yes.

But did you consider how much they earned in addition to that by depositing into their own scheme?
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1005
New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit
January 21, 2015, 01:28:53 AM
#1
Current addresses on website:
https://blockchain.info/address/1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk
https://blockchain.info/address/124hrKamS1ZQpEXQ3bPkrjp6KDKxspMfXp

Respective fees address:
https://blockchain.info/address/1FeespcqD5HpJ38HzsmDqwxaTxpZBs57P4  Total Received   59.21465542 BTC
https://blockchain.info/address/1FeesQ8Nfii6SmXrkvBXP5iqUm5T6dztz  Total Received   19.65123202 BTC

Total = ~80BTC

Or

5% * 915.185 = 45.75925
5% * 303.827 = 15.19135

Total = ~60BTC

Jump to: