That's one idea, it's a terrible idea but definitely one idea. Middle class is shrinking as it is, and poor people do use a lot of resources, in fact rich people do use a lot less.
For example, look at how much Taylor Swift spent on her airfare, she used private jet all around the nation, and then all around the world too, and we have seen how much she "destroyed" the world, surely a lot for one person without a shred of doubt, but then combine all the cheapest tickets that was in the same year and you will see that she is not even 1% of that, so I can tell you that rich are using more than a poor person when you compare one to one, but because there are a lot of poor people, when you combine all of us, we spend more than the rich people combined.
Plus, which resource are you talking about, if you are talking about just water, we use more, if you think about wheat or rice, we use more, but if you are asking caviar, sure they use more of it.
Topic: Wef plan great reset and envoirement saving (Read 74 times)
The wealthiest 10%, responsible for about half of the global CO2 emissions from their luxury lifestyle, form the vital core of economies and societies. For example, many middle class people drive consumption of more sustainable products and demand better environmental policies  .
On the other hand, it is probable that a decrease in economic inequality would be beneficial to the environment. Indeed, various studies have documented that people in more equal societies consume fewer resources in total, use more public transportation, and develop more sustainable behavior. Simply eliminating the middle class would destabilize economies and worsen poverty without necessarily yielding environmental dividends. Instead, overconsumption by the wealthy must be reduced and sustainable behaviors encouraged across classes.
On the other hand, it is probable that a decrease in economic inequality would be beneficial to the environment. Indeed, various studies have documented that people in more equal societies consume fewer resources in total, use more public transportation, and develop more sustainable behavior. Simply eliminating the middle class would destabilize economies and worsen poverty without necessarily yielding environmental dividends. Instead, overconsumption by the wealthy must be reduced and sustainable behaviors encouraged across classes.
The WEF are a huge risk to all our lives. Agenda 2030 is outright communism. What they plan for us is not good. We must resist the WEF & everything they stand for. From their net zero propaganda to CBDCs to buying up all the farmland to try & control our food supplies. They are not good people.
If only there was a decentralized network/censorship-resistant cryptocurrency, and that has weakening-political-stronghold properties invented. That would probably help weaken their long term socio-economic agenda, no?
Because if Bitcoin's number of users surges and reaches a critical level, then I believe that it may build and develop its own economy with Bitcoin as the main currency.
Middle class use a lot resources water and others.
If in the world only rich and poor then envoirement can be saved a lot.
If in the world only rich and poor then envoirement can be saved a lot.
First of All your thread needs thorough polishing and the sentence must pass a direct message for clearer understanding tho, then looking at the environment we know it's been polluted by alot of carbon and both the rich, middle class and poor breathe from this toxic chemicals but to you talking about the middle class being in possession of all of this resources it's absolutely not true cause we all are benefiting from it as well, so the environment can be saved with the help of everyone putting hands on deck but not leaving it for one body.
The WEF are a huge risk to all our lives. Agenda 2030 is outright communism. What they plan for us is not good. We must resist the WEF & everything they stand for. From their net zero propaganda to CBDCs to buying up all the farmland to try & control our food supplies. They are not good people.
Middle class use a lot resources water and others.
If in the world only rich and poor then envoirement can be saved a lot.
So there will be not rich people more than poor ones and poor ones don't consume much they don't have no cars and they don't go to out much most times they work.
If middleclass gone then envoirement will be saved.
That's the one idea
Bro rich and middle class both are impacting on the environment and our environment is polluted because of these people. Rich people made factories and industries which are main cause of pollution in our environment. Rich people know about the facts and figures and they are educated ignorant because their education could not change their thinking and they only read books and then got skills but they have no enthusiasm for their country. Middle class people have also automobiles which are cause of pollution in our environment but they have limited resources as comparison to rich people. And poor want have very less resources and they want to live happily and that don't want more resources. If in the world only rich and poor then envoirement can be saved a lot.
So there will be not rich people more than poor ones and poor ones don't consume much they don't have no cars and they don't go to out much most times they work.
If middleclass gone then envoirement will be saved.
That's the one idea
Middle class use a lot resources water and others.
If in the world only rich and poor then envoirement can be saved a lot.
So there will be not rich people more than poor ones and poor ones don't consume much they don't have no cars and they don't go to out much most times they work.
If middleclass gone then envoirement will be saved.
That's the one idea
If in the world only rich and poor then envoirement can be saved a lot.
So there will be not rich people more than poor ones and poor ones don't consume much they don't have no cars and they don't go to out much most times they work.
If middleclass gone then envoirement will be saved.
That's the one idea
Jump to: