Topic: What do you guyz think about NEO vs Ether ico's (Read 121 times)
As far as I observe neo icos are far less in quantity but they have more quality and get funded more. I still tend to invest in ethereum tokens because ethereum tokens are much more accessible. I am not sure so..
Yes I agree with you neo has 100 times higher fees to deploy smart contract which reduces number of scam projects to minimum as compare to ethereum. Also the grip of neo platform is increasing day by day with so many upcoming and ongoing projects good ICOs. Presently Neo platform looks more promising as compare ethereum t in terms of quality, rewards, passive income and there haven't been any case of scam project on neo platform.
Woah thanks for the merit. I had just about given up on trying to get merit considering how difficult it is. Really did not expect that. Thanks so much
Yes I agree with you neo has 100 times higher fees to deploy smart contract which reduces number of scam projects to minimum as compare to ethereum. Also the grip of neo platform is increasing day by day with so many upcoming and ongoing projects good ICOs. Presently Neo platform looks more promising as compare ethereum t in terms of quality, rewards, passive income and there haven't been any case of scam project on neo platform.
i would be less keen on ICOs on lower volume coins. the point of an ICO is for the developers to dump and run. with ETH that's fine, there are almost as many outlets as BTC plus active OTC markets.
with something smaller it's a possibility the dumping could nail the coin's trading for a while. also the smaller something is the more volatile it is. even ETH themselves ran out of money when they didn't dump at the right time. it's possible that fancy ICO might go broke if they don't time their sells properly.
with something smaller it's a possibility the dumping could nail the coin's trading for a while. also the smaller something is the more volatile it is. even ETH themselves ran out of money when they didn't dump at the right time. it's possible that fancy ICO might go broke if they don't time their sells properly.
so far i see all the ico based blockchain neo is always a success and so far i have not heard any ico scam from there. but all ico platforms have their respective advantages and disadvantages, so it all depends on the results of our own research and choice, whether promising or scam.
Neo icos generally have performed better but there is less competition there is suppose. This again can be both an advantage and disadvantage.
Fewer number of icos means that investors have fewer options available to them, but it means its easier to make picks(inflexibilty/limitations in choice can sometimes be a strategic advantage).
Further the higher costs of development in NEO 10k or 500 gas development costs as opposed to 100$ on ether do mean that project on neo end up being stronger, while it also helps to weed out a good deal of the fraudulent icos.
Give me your take
Fewer number of icos means that investors have fewer options available to them, but it means its easier to make picks(inflexibilty/limitations in choice can sometimes be a strategic advantage).
Further the higher costs of development in NEO 10k or 500 gas development costs as opposed to 100$ on ether do mean that project on neo end up being stronger, while it also helps to weed out a good deal of the fraudulent icos.
Give me your take
You are right in your statement, although NEO platform is new, but we cannot predict its future, and aside from that, fewer competition means a good to business, in fact, its more profitable when there is no less competition, but on the other hand, ETHER is widely used, and almost all of the incoming and outgoing ICO's out there are Ethereum based platform, and so, it is being adapted by many developers., which is a good side of ethereum.
I think its better to focus on NEO this time, and currently, im searching ICO projects that are NEO based. Who knows, we can do a lot with NEO.
Have a good day
Neo icos generally have performed better but there is less competition there is suppose. This again can be both an advantage and disadvantage.
Fewer number of icos means that investors have fewer options available to them, but it means its easier to make picks(inflexibilty/limitations in choice can sometimes be a strategic advantage).
Further the higher costs of development in NEO 10k or 500 gas development costs as opposed to 100$ on ether do mean that project on neo end up being stronger, while it also helps to weed out a good deal of the fraudulent icos.
Give me your take
Fewer number of icos means that investors have fewer options available to them, but it means its easier to make picks(inflexibilty/limitations in choice can sometimes be a strategic advantage).
Further the higher costs of development in NEO 10k or 500 gas development costs as opposed to 100$ on ether do mean that project on neo end up being stronger, while it also helps to weed out a good deal of the fraudulent icos.
Give me your take
Jump to: