I'll probably not invest if the coins aren't censorship resistant, meaning they can't be seized by the entity that controls them. If the stablecoins are centralized and controlled centrally, they could be easily seized by those who control them whenever they want.
I guess you prefer stablecoin to avoid situations where investors money becomes more or less valuable when it's refunded. If that's the case how do you handle a situation where a stablecoin is devalue against Bitcoin or any currency the investor sent you money from? Would you consider paying Interest or something to avoid any potential conflict? If you use a censorship resistant coin like Bitcoin, you probably could agree with the investors that they will be paid exactly how much they contribute in Bitcoin, whether it goes up or down. This should give the investors who accept the Terms peace of mind knowing that the ICO fund will not be seized by governments that do not like ICO.
I also would want such Smart-contract Fund with feature that gradually release funds to developers based on how well they have used part of the fund released to them by the smart contract. This should happen automatically.
We prefer stablecoin to get ahead of the depreciation or gain of the investor's investment when it is refunded. That's a reason we just can accept stable coins such as USDT.In this case, we guarantee to pay back the same amount of USDT which they invest.
our soft cap and hard cap are targeted in dollars so your aim is for our investors to invest on dollar basis
In fact, we thought that cut off a few percent from investing example 10% to advertising payments. purpose to reach more people to find more investors. so they can refund back 90% percent back if the count reaches to cap. it's a course to raise ICO more quickly. And it automatically happens when the investors pay for tokens.
by the way, we developed a smart contract that releases funds of developers separately at time intervals. Even all distribution of tokens ll be the same.