this is a false quote:
the Dragonmint is supreme.
Sure, because they use 10nm chips produced by Samsung, while Bitmain uses 16nm chips.
But I wonder why efficiency is so low - 16TH/s , comparing with Bitmain's 14Th? 10nm should have at least 60% performance over 16 mn, doesn't it?
real post below
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
That doesn't change that these are more efficient than the S9 so will give you more BTC for every $ you spend on electricity. That's the only thing that should matter.
You realize that the efficiency is so close that your arguement is null and void right?At 10 cent power you are talking about a $5/month difference in power for similar hashrates and the Dragon costs literally twice as much to purchase new.
It would take the miner running 10 years for things to even out.
You need to look at the big picture and not at one small data point.
This term, "more than" is being used quite a bit about these miners, to justify it's shortcomings. To further the justification, the resident Bitmain Haters, ignore these shortcomings in a spiteful bliss. There's no changing their minds about it. 1 out of the 5 they ACTUALLY received, hashes near or slightly above spec, so it's instantaneously proven, to them,
the Dragonmint is supreme. Nevermind the other 4, that have to be tinkered with, just to come close to the 1, with a efficiency loss. These consumers are oblivious, simply for the bragging rights of having this miner. <-------insert face palm here!!!
[/quote]
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
########################################################################
the Dragonmint is supreme.
Sure, because they use 10nm chips produced by Samsung, while Bitmain uses 16nm chips.
But I wonder why efficiency is so low - 16TH/s , comparing with Bitmain's 14Th? 10nm should have at least 60% performance over 16 mn, doesn't it?
I'd prefer you not snip my post, making it look as if
I feel they are supreme.
They are not and that's my point. Thank you!!!
##################################################################################
@ mods I believe cuteman should be talked to via for doing the above to Shazam
[/quote]
Other people on the thread have already quoted the false quote giving it a more wrong look..
