I know no one will help me. This forum is full of gangs. So, if you are alone, no one will support you although you are right.
For this f*cker @SmokerFace, yes you win. Even DT and forum staff look like support you.
Thank you @theymos and @Cyrus that you allow me be one of the member of this forum. Now, I am thinking to leave. Thank you once again.
Topic: What is my mistake exactly @JollyGood? (Read 233 times)
After doing some research I found some of his alts that aren't tagged, I'd wait for him to say what he wants me to do, should I report them or not?
Luqman: Tell me what you want?, State your intention here and not on PM!
@Luqman
This is your situation right now 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eb_X81pLp_A'
Luqman: Tell me what you want?, State your intention here and not on PM!
@Luqman
This is your situation right now 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eb_X81pLp_A'
I never heard of the DT monthly lottery being described as a never ending wheel of misfortune before 
I will probably be on DT2 next month whereas some or one of the others that left negative trust for the OP might make it to DT1 so it is a sort of misfortune as such on part of the OP because the account he was farming to generate funds by using a signature campaign - well it is probably rendered useless now and he has only himself to blame. I wonder how many other accounts he is using though...
He will stay on my ignore list, that is where he deserves to be. Hopefully he will stop complaining now and will give up on this Luqman account but he will continue to signature spam with his other accounts until someone starts tagging them too.
(edit: DT = wheel of misfortune does ring a bell)
I will probably be on DT2 next month whereas some or one of the others that left negative trust for the OP might make it to DT1 so it is a sort of misfortune as such on part of the OP because the account he was farming to generate funds by using a signature campaign - well it is probably rendered useless now and he has only himself to blame. I wonder how many other accounts he is using though...
He will stay on my ignore list, that is where he deserves to be. Hopefully he will stop complaining now and will give up on this Luqman account but he will continue to signature spam with his other accounts until someone starts tagging them too.
OP, you were already on my ignore list from way back, since I haven't added any new members to it in a while. All you have on your trust page is negative and neutrals, and they all describe why you received them. Some of them are from months ago, and yet now you're complaining about a neg from JollyGood?
Seems to me like you deserve everything that's on your trust page and also should be on the ignore list of anyone who cares about the pollution of bitcointalk from shitposters. Nothing you write here has any value whatsoever, and it's obvious what your motive is for being a member of the forum.
Seems to me like you deserve everything that's on your trust page and also should be on the ignore list of anyone who cares about the pollution of bitcointalk from shitposters. Nothing you write here has any value whatsoever, and it's obvious what your motive is for being a member of the forum.
Luqman seems to find the negative trust I left for him excessive but he does not seem to have a problem with the other 3 members that have left him negative tags.
I'm thinking it's probably because you're on DT now and others aren't? I have a custom trust list, so I'm pretty sure any net negative trust will show up differently on my profile. I don't even know who's on DT anymore, as it's a neverending wheel of misfortune.(edit: DT = wheel of misfortune does ring a bell)
OP, you were already on my ignore list from way back, since I haven't added any new members to it in a while. All you have on your trust page is negative and neutrals, and they all describe why you received them. Some of them are from months ago, and yet now you're complaining about a neg from JollyGood?
Seems to me like you deserve everything that's on your trust page and also should be on the ignore list of anyone who cares about the pollution of bitcointalk from shitposters. Nothing you write here has any value whatsoever, and it's obvious what your motive is for being a member of the forum.
Seems to me like you deserve everything that's on your trust page and also should be on the ignore list of anyone who cares about the pollution of bitcointalk from shitposters. Nothing you write here has any value whatsoever, and it's obvious what your motive is for being a member of the forum.
Luqman seems to find the negative trust I left for him excessive but he does not seem to have a problem with the other 3 members that have left him negative tags.
I'm thinking it's probably because you're on DT now and others aren't? I have a custom trust list, so I'm pretty sure any net negative trust will show up differently on my profile. I don't even know who's on DT anymore, as it's a neverending wheel of misfortune. You know, I am debating one of the puppets of 1xbit.com signature campaign. He tried to defame Roobet!
You highlighted the sentence "I wonder if Roobet exits scams or scams" but with a big "if". I'm not sure what this proves.
If I bought 1000 Bitcoin at the $20 price, I would be a millionaire now. But if...
If it is about bounty cheating, is 2 Red-Trust not enough? There are many members with the same case, but they even only got 1 Red-Trust.
did you open a discussion for the other two negative tags on your account? Why is JollyGood's red tag so important for you and started this drama?
Maybe he will reply to your question about why he started this drama?
I don't know what's wrong with you. I never against you, I never tried to join a scammer campaign. But you granted A Red-Trust with no clear reason.
I know you are a famous member, have a very good reputation to fight scammers, and do various good contributions on this forum. But today, I am surprised you gave a Red-Trust to a member who wants to help fighting to a scammer puppet.
I know you are a famous member, have a very good reputation to fight scammers, and do various good contributions on this forum. But today, I am surprised you gave a Red-Trust to a member who wants to help fighting to a scammer puppet.
My first reaction: LOL!
When I think about it-
[1] - You're acting so retarded and pathetic on a (so called) digital forum and even have to beg to get rid of your problems That's a different thing they won't be cleared .... I can only imagine the conscious or subconscious begging you've to do in Real Life to get your ends...People like you don't even deserve my attention but you're getting it anyway so be proud about it and
[2] - Stop boosting the 'FAKE' ego of people like 'JollyBood' and 'HollyGood', they'll have problems in Real life if they interact with the world with the 'EGO's karma' they gained from the likes of you.
@JollyGood, I hope you read this
Yes reading this should 'OPEN' his eyes.
I don't see only negative on his profile.
Posting as a reference for the fabulous service you offered to us all, Thank you.
You know, I am debating one of the puppets of 1xbit.com signature campaign. He tried to defame Roobet!
You highlighted the sentence "I wonder if Roobet exits scams or scams" but with a big "if". I'm not sure what this proves.
If I bought 1000 Bitcoin at the $20 price, I would be a millionaire now. But if...
If it is about bounty cheating, is 2 Red-Trust not enough? There are many members with the same case, but they even only got 1 Red-Trust.
did you open a discussion for the other two negative tags on your account? Why is JollyGood's red tag so important for you and started this drama?
It will be a different story if the same person gives you multiple negative feedback for same reason.
No, if the same person gives several reviews, then the negative review will be equal to one, and the neutral one will also be equal to one. You can leave the same review several times, but this does not affect the quantity.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2861357
It is much more difficult to remove two or three reviews from different people, since one person's opinion may remain unchanged, while the other person may change their review.
Bro, Promise I really understand your concern and I really read your case including all the attached link you provide before I comment here. Trust system is decentralized meaning DT can give you trust feedback base on there personal opinion. The majority of feedback you received is just a re-echo feedback that intensify because of your participation on shady campaign. The number of negative trust feedback is not that important because they are just pointing out same reason and you can clear it all at one go if ever you manage to defend yourself.
Edit
It will be a different story if the same person gives you multiple negative feedback for same reason.
Edit
It will be a different story if the same person gives you multiple negative feedback for same reason.
Are you aware about the real reason of your red trust feedback? Maybe you should fully read the description and click the reference link attached on it. It's not only about promoting scam but because you cheat bounty campaigns using multiple account. I already attached the reference link for the accusation to you so better to focus on that rather dealing personally on Jolly good re-echo trust feedback against you.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.56743485
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.56743485
Read this, mate:
1. After a long time @actmyname gave the neutral trust to me, why do you just support him now?
The big question is even @actmyname only gave neutral trust to all members of Spammer Blacklist. Why did you give me Red-Trust?
Please read carefully.
I have got 2 Red Trust from lovesmayfamilis and CryptopreneurBrainboss, what for to gave me another Red-trust? I think 2 Red-Trust is more than enough.
Look at below. There are a lot of members did the same mistake, but they even only get 1 Red-Trust. Why I got 3 Red-Trust? Is 2 Red-Trust not enough?
Example:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2331254
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2555541
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2972118
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2790914
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2158537
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2158548
And there are many other members with the same case.
Please Read This
Are you aware about the real reason of your red trust feedback? Maybe you should fully read the description and click the reference link attached on it. It's not only about promoting scam but because you cheat bounty campaigns using multiple account. I already attached the reference link for the accusation to you so better to focus on that rather dealing personally on Jolly good re-echo trust feedback against you.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.56743485
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.56743485
Read this, mate:
1. After a long time @actmyname gave the neutral trust to me, why do you just support him now?
The big question is even @actmyname only gave neutral trust to all members of Spammer Blacklist. Why did you give me Red-Trust?
Please read carefully.
Are you aware about the real reason of your red trust feedback? Maybe you should fully read the description and click the reference link attached on it. It's not only about promoting scam but because you cheat bounty campaigns using multiple account. I already attached the reference link for the accusation to you so better to focus on that rather dealing personally on Jolly good re-echo trust feedback against you.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.56743485
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.56743485
Because you gave me Red-Trust. SmokerFace thinks he already won the debate. Thank you @JollyGood.
Dear @JollyGood.
I don't know what's wrong with you. I never against you, I never tried to join a scammer campaign. But you granted A Red-Trust with no clear reason.
I know you are a famous member, have a very good reputation to fight scammers, and do various good contributions on this forum. But today, I am surprised you gave a Red-Trust to a member who wants to help fighting to a scammer puppet.
After I write the statement below, @JollyGood directly gave me Red_Trust.
Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.57494592
Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.57508250
You know, I am debating one of the puppets of 1xbit.com signature campaign. He tried to defame Roobet!
Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.57493381
What is the real reason behind the Red-Trust?
1. After a long time @actmyname gave the neutral trust to me, why do you just support him now?
The big question is "even @actmyname only gave neutral trust to all members of Spammer Blacklist". Why did you give me Red-Trust?
If it is about bounty cheating, is 2 Red-Trust not enough? There are many members with the same case, but they even only got 1 Red-Trust.
Addition: I think you have edited the reason to give me Red-Trust.
2. I know I have two Red-Trust, but I have no intention to join 1xbit.com signature campaign.
If I want, I will do it since the first time I saw it. But I didn't do it, because I have no intention to join.
3. Do all the members who have Red-Trust must be suspected and mistreated?
@JollyGood, I hope you read this and open your eyes that not all Red-Trust accounts must be suspected. Although I have two Red-Trust, I have the intention to do good things. I know I ever did a mistake in the past, but it doesn't mean I never changed. Note that I really regretted what I ever did, and now I am trying to do a better thing.
Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.57494592
Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.57508250
You know, I am debating one of the puppets of 1xbit.com signature campaign. He tried to defame Roobet!
Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.57493381
What is the real reason behind the Red-Trust?
1. After a long time @actmyname gave the neutral trust to me, why do you just support him now?
The big question is "even @actmyname only gave neutral trust to all members of Spammer Blacklist". Why did you give me Red-Trust?
If it is about bounty cheating, is 2 Red-Trust not enough? There are many members with the same case, but they even only got 1 Red-Trust.
Addition: I think you have edited the reason to give me Red-Trust.
2. I know I have two Red-Trust, but I have no intention to join 1xbit.com signature campaign.
If I want, I will do it since the first time I saw it. But I didn't do it, because I have no intention to join.
3. Do all the members who have Red-Trust must be suspected and mistreated?
@JollyGood, I hope you read this and open your eyes that not all Red-Trust accounts must be suspected. Although I have two Red-Trust, I have the intention to do good things. I know I ever did a mistake in the past, but it doesn't mean I never changed. Note that I really regretted what I ever did, and now I am trying to do a better thing.
Jump to: