Author

Topic: What is the best way to compare PCs? (HP DL385 G7) (Read 106 times)

newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
I have 3 HP DL385 G7 and I would like to compare them and see what is causing the differences between hash rates.

All are...
HP DL385 G7
Win10
8G Ram (4x2G 2Rx8 PC3-10600R-9-10-B0)
xmr-stak 2.4.3 3272f16
no other cards

Machine #1 - 6234x2 - last config line - { "low_power_mode" : true, "no_prefetch" : false, "affine_to_cpu" : 22 },
HASHRATE REPORT - CPU -
| ID |    10s |    60s |    15m | ID |    10s |    60s |    15m |
|  0 |   63.7 |   63.2 |   (na) |  1 |   63.6 |   63.3 |   (na) |
|  2 |   63.7 |   63.2 |   (na) |  3 |   64.0 |   63.8 |   (na) |
|  4 |   64.0 |   63.8 |   (na) |  5 |   64.0 |   63.7 |   (na) |
|  6 |   64.3 |   63.2 |   (na) |  7 |   64.2 |   63.2 |   (na) |
|  8 |   64.1 |   63.0 |   (na) |  9 |   63.9 |   64.2 |   (na) |
| 10 |   63.9 |   64.1 |   (na) | 11 |   63.9 |   63.9 |   (na) |
Totals (CPU):   767.1  762.6    0.0 H/s
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Totals (ALL):    767.1  762.6    0.0 H/s
Highest:   771.4 H/s
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Machine #2 - 6238x2 - last config line - {"low_power_mode" : true, "no_prefetch" : false, "affine_to_cpu" : 22 },
| ID |    10s |    60s |    15m | ID |    10s |    60s |    15m |
|  0 |   65.6 |   65.7 |   (na) |  1 |   65.5 |   65.8 |   (na) |
|  2 |   65.2 |   65.6 |   (na) |  3 |   66.9 |   66.9 |   (na) |
|  4 |   66.8 |   66.8 |   (na) |  5 |   66.7 |   66.7 |   (na) |
|  6 |   67.0 |   66.8 |   (na) |  7 |   66.9 |   66.7 |   (na) |
|  8 |   66.8 |   66.7 |   (na) |  9 |   66.6 |   66.5 |   (na) |
| 10 |   66.4 |   66.4 |   (na) | 11 |   66.1 |   66.1 |   (na) |
Totals (CPU):   796.6  796.7    0.0 H/s
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Totals (ALL):    796.6  796.7    0.0 H/s
Highest:   803.2 H/s
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Machine #3 - 6272x2 - ran it with low_power_mode" : false and low_power_mode" : true
last config line - { "low_power_mode" : true, "no_prefetch" : false, "affine_to_cpu" : 30 },
| ID |    10s |    60s |    15m | ID |    10s |    60s |    15m |
|  0 |   40.8 |   40.3 |   (na) |  1 |   40.9 |   40.5 |   (na) |
|  2 |   40.8 |   40.5 |   (na) |  3 |   40.6 |   40.3 |   (na) |
|  4 |   41.3 |   41.6 |   (na) |  5 |   41.4 |   41.9 |   (na) |
|  6 |   41.4 |   41.8 |   (na) |  7 |   41.2 |   41.8 |   (na) |
|  8 |   41.3 |   41.2 |   (na) |  9 |   41.3 |   41.3 |   (na) |
| 10 |   41.3 |   41.3 |   (na) | 11 |   40.9 |   41.2 |   (na) |
| 12 |   41.4 |   41.8 |   (na) | 13 |   41.3 |   41.8 |   (na) |
| 14 |   41.4 |   42.0 |   (na) | 15 |   40.9 |   41.6 |   (na) |
Totals (CPU):   658.3  660.9    0.0 H/s
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Totals (ALL):    658.3  660.9    0.0 H/s
Highest:   671.1 H/s
-----------------------------------------------------------------

last config line - { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : false, "affine_to_cpu" : 30 },
| ID |    10s |    60s |    15m | ID |    10s |    60s |    15m |
|  0 |   46.0 |   (na) |   (na) |  1 |   46.3 |   (na) |   (na) |
|  2 |   46.3 |   (na) |   (na) |  3 |   46.2 |   (na) |   (na) |
|  4 |   46.3 |   (na) |   (na) |  5 |   46.2 |   (na) |   (na) |
|  6 |   46.2 |   (na) |   (na) |  7 |   46.1 |   (na) |   (na) |
|  8 |   46.5 |   (na) |   (na) |  9 |   46.3 |   (na) |   (na) |
| 10 |   46.4 |   (na) |   (na) | 11 |   46.5 |   (na) |   (na) |
| 12 |   46.0 |   (na) |   (na) | 13 |   46.1 |   (na) |   (na) |
| 14 |   46.3 |   (na) |   (na) | 15 |   46.4 |   (na) |   (na) |
Totals (CPU):   740.2    0.0    0.0 H/s
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Totals (ALL):    740.2    0.0    0.0 H/s
Highest:   743.3 H/s
-----------------------------------------------------------------

I want to compare machines #1 or #2 to machine #3 so I can figure out why the 6234 and 6238 are hashing at a higher rate than the 6272. What is the best way to approach this?

Thanks!
Jump to: