All I really know about the bailouts is that everyone seems to be very upset about them. And on the surface level I agree, why would failing companies be kept afloat by taxpayer money? The whole point of capitalism is that competition will make the best companies survive, and the ones that aren't up to the task are cut. But I'm not an economist and I don't know enough about this. What is the explanation behind the bailouts? Are they actually a good thing for the public and the economy? Why or why not?
I think that the US, like most other countries are really run by an elitist group of people with a lot of money and influence, and they have connections in most business sectors, and they cover for each other. That's the answer in my view.
It's a bit like: My nephew fucked it up quite badly, but I'm from a really rich family, but this time we can't help him, so we need to get help from our super rich uncle, which will help the family put everything together. The bailouts are just on a much larger scale.
The reason that everyone is upset about it, but why nothing happens, is because those upset are not those in power to change anything.
On a mini level, if 10000 people are really upset about something, but only 5 of those really has a say in what happens, what those 5 says is what happens. The other 9995 really do have absolute power, if they acted in concert, but they never will, and so the current system continues, and will probably continue forever.
In the real world you have a diverse group of people. You have those elitist people in charge, and you have a whole lot of people who're angry on the current system, but they're not big in numbers, and then you have the large mass of people who are completely swayed by marketing campaigns, mass media, and are mostly concerned about finishing their workday so they can get home and watch sports on TV while drinking beer.
So in reality it's all about power and money.