I'm not sure, but I think what he meant here is that crypto projects shouldn't be using banks for their overall fiat holdings. Especially now that Silicon Valley Bank is trying to cut ties with crypto-related startups.
This makes me think, if we cut loose the banks then how does the economy will work for bitcoin? Like I am talking in terms of fiat valuation and those rotating funds. If all of a sudden banks are discontinued then we will have to count in bitcoin in terms of bitcoin itself. You know those old days when we used to say 1
BTC to 1
BTC kinda formula one more time?
Why is that so? Since right now bitcoin is measured in USD (& subsequently with other currencies) and this valuation is there because that much USD is moving around the world to buy the proportionate amount of bitcoins. Let us say we are sending bitcoin from New York to Scottland, it will be counted as 1
BTC in NY while 1
BTC in Scottland. However, when it will come to withdrawing the 1
BTC for fiat, then they will do the conversions accordingly and pay the receiver that much amount in sterling pounds. Ain't that going to change with such transactions?
Coming down to the OP, yeah we have P2P, the most anonymous way to do it. However, with ever-growing KYC regulations that are also an exposed option. You can have someone from your friend zone and trade with each other.