Hi everyone, my team and I have been working on a platform called https://basescore.co that captures and aggregates reviews from various ICO review sources. We believe that when you can get the full spectrum of what the critics are saying, that it's is the best way to get an unbiased perspective on an ICO so investors can make smarter, more informed decisions.
Anyways, not to shill my own project, just what tools do you use to perform research on your ICOs? I'd love to hear your opinion.
Anyways, not to shill my own project, just what tools do you use to perform research on your ICOs? I'd love to hear your opinion.
But, if you are basing the rating on what critics are saying, then isn't the perspective completely biased? We all know 90% of critics are actually shilling. Most of them are so obvious, and some try to be objective but ultimately they are only repeating what they can see and read. How many critics are blockchain developers? How many know how to code?
The research should base ratings from peer review of code. And if there is no code, there is no project, that is, vaporware.
