Topic: What will you give higher rank when analyzing an ICO? (Read 105 times)
It is important that everything in the analysis of ico be taken into account. Is the development team real? Do the figures and the data in the whitepaper match when calculating? Everything must be considered.
Virtually everyone will agree that the community size is one of the most important determinant factor in considering an investment in any ICO. However, this can also go either way round as it has misled millions of investors in investing in wrong and shitty ICO only to discover they are only posing as being real. I think what is much important than just looking at the community size is checking for one self all what the ICO entails and has to offer in reading through the whitepaper, roadmap. Cos coins with great future potentials are those that will offer great development to the entire Blockchain Technology, not those which will varnish in no time.
I'm looking at the idea, of course, how much will be claimed, presumably. Are there any competitors. How is the project going, how was the presale? What the team? Did they have product already or create?
The size of community is important because if lots of investors commit their money during presale meaning the project is viable , and possibly it is already successfully in operation. The utility of the token which ensures the usage of token in the operation This give the token inherent value that will last a long time even after an initial ICO product launch.
Both are important. Of course community is a kind of guarantee, but product quality also creates opportunities for success in the future. There is already many coins with big community due to big promotion actions but value of the coin is still low. LoMoCoin is good example here. Their idea with LoMoStar app was awesome but it didnt bring results. Interesting project worth to observe is Nebula Network, soon there will be an ICO. I hope my invested money will grow fast.
I accredit community size the more, though I still have some other research to make, but nevertheless i believe when there is a large community size, it has already signify that many have supported the project, and the probability of its success is high.
+1 for the community
But the main element to watch carefully is the whitepaper compared to other ones, and if relevant, the github sources
But the main element to watch carefully is the whitepaper compared to other ones, and if relevant, the github sources
Yes, may at times it becomes a sign of coins that earn profit more than others and so they have a bigger community.
I think this is a job that is not easy, it's quite complicated and it takes time to research a lot of ico. I personally, trying to find all the overall information on the ico. analyzing as a whole. then I compare with ico that I have learned first.
Trying to understand what people are looking for when investigating an ICO...
More than that - Do you give more credit to product or community size when deciding if you're gonna invest?
More than that - Do you give more credit to product or community size when deciding if you're gonna invest?
Yes of course we will give more credit and more support if we are deciding to invest.
Because if the project success, we will get the positive impact from it since we are investors.
Community matters, if there is a big community even before ico, that means lots of people already trust the project. I think capability of project members is also important.
Trying to understand what people are looking for when investigating an ICO...
More than that - Do you give more credit to product or community size when deciding if you're gonna invest?
More than that - Do you give more credit to product or community size when deciding if you're gonna invest?
Jump to: