Topic: What would the bitcoin graph look like without China? (Read 639 times)
Now?
same.. but for long time
China has only helped to speedup growth!
China has only helped to speedup growth!
It really depends if you look at it like they never entered the market in the first place versus just suddenly plucking out all China exchanges in a single moment while the impact of the publicity still remained.
I think China publicity helped the price increase which even if it was a bubble still attracted a lot of new entrepreneurs and general public awareness, which in turn helps the long-term and short-term growth.
I think China publicity helped the price increase which even if it was a bubble still attracted a lot of new entrepreneurs and general public awareness, which in turn helps the long-term and short-term growth.
I agree that it helped the price increase, but the rise/sudden fall when the bad news came out of China gave serious ammunition to people who say that it can't be currency because of the insane fluctuation.
It really depends if you look at it like they never entered the market in the first place versus just suddenly plucking out all China exchanges in a single moment while the impact of the publicity still remained.
I think China publicity helped the price increase which even if it was a bubble still attracted a lot of new entrepreneurs and general public awareness, which in turn helps the long-term and short-term growth.
I think China publicity helped the price increase which even if it was a bubble still attracted a lot of new entrepreneurs and general public awareness, which in turn helps the long-term and short-term growth.
China was a bubble...
It really depends if you look at it like they never entered the market in the first place versus just suddenly plucking out all China exchanges in a single moment while the impact of the publicity still remained.
I think China publicity helped the price increase which even if it was a bubble still attracted a lot of new entrepreneurs and general public awareness, which in turn helps the long-term and short-term growth.
I think China publicity helped the price increase which even if it was a bubble still attracted a lot of new entrepreneurs and general public awareness, which in turn helps the long-term and short-term growth.
why would that matter?
well i heard in china theres guys sitting outside a chinese bank with bags of money selling money below the exchange rate of the banks.
Probably we have reached a 600-650$ maximum: China has only helped to speedup the normal trend
I agree with this. It just would have been interesting to see the rise and fall due to U.S. moves instead of it getting mixed up in Chinese speculation.
Any time high would be around 500. The US senate hearing helped Bitcoin adoption as well
Probably around 250 bucks
Well, you can now see what it'll look like 
Pre-China we were averaging $200/BTC
Pre-China we were averaging $200/BTC
Serious question.
Jump to: