3 What do you mean? Suggestions perhaps?
4 Ok I will check it out
Also what did you think about all the other potential names (if it is too much work nvm i guess but it would be very helpful.)
Also, for others reading, I think I will take down nonresponse/indifference as a rating = 5/10
Feel free to throw out other names I haven't considered.
2) Before you bring religion into it, the topic is probably best served by fitting scripture quotes to the facts not twisting the facts to for the religion.
3) Morality WTF it's subjective!
4) An interesting tale on Morality and a guide to assessing morality objectively, is listed below. (Lots of perspectives and Fud,) you can't get to the bottom of it because it is subjective, but give it a go.
The Science of Morality, Part 1
The Science of Morality, Part 2
Some reading: After Atheism
After Atheism Part 1
After Atheism Part 2
After Atheism Part 3
None of you names have any traction with me. (thinking about it, few couples deicide on a name before there're pregnant and the baby is well formed in the womb, or even name it after its birth. Don't get hung up on the name by putting the cart before the house, you need to gestate before you have a feel for the name.)
Re herzmeister point, in the past 8 years of intrest I have read a lot of existing ideas / a myriad of theories, all of which present truths, yet all to a lesser or greater degree rendered invalid or opposed because of the authors a prejudice, or preconceived ideal.
So while there is opportunity to take all the truths and reconcile the theoretical ingredients from the perspective of an objective morality, which is what I understood from your OP, that is no small task.
IMO some prominent understandings expressed by Adam Smith, Marx, Mises, Keynes, among many others all have shortcomings common insights and omissions.