I can think of a people of reasons:
- Bitcoin is way too slow, with transactions taking nearly an hour to complete.
- Transaction fees are ridiculous.
- It is, by nature, something that runs contrary to state interest and therefore never had a future at all. Any vehicle that brings about unpunished anonomity, or at least obstructs the view on financial transactions, will be an enemy of nation states.
- There are plenty of alternatives out there as well that achieve the same, with some of them (Ripple for example) that have different targets but an actual real world usecase - instead of a merely 99% speculative one
- The public at large is probably getting more informed and reading up on alternatives that make way more sense.
- A general shift in market sentiment, from bullish to bearish, which has been taking place in the month of December.
Those arguments are full of shit
- have you actually used bitcoin or only listed to the Bcash propaganda? Yes the network is slow at the times and yes fees are high but nowhere near as high and slow as they were back in the summer. Yet in the summer when transactions were slow and expensive prices climbed to new highs almost at a daily basis.
- as I've already said things were much worse. Go actually use segwit instead of bitching about high fees and confirmation times.
- I don't see how nations are negatively influencing bitcoin atm other than the South Korea FUD.
- it's funny how you use ripple as an example when it's market is clearly corrupted by market manipulation and speculation. I agree there are options with interesting tech (like raiblocks for example) but don't forget things aren't that bad and solutions are on the way.
- so how does bitcoin not make sense?
- if you can't handle a 50% corrections you don't deserve 1000% gains. 'nuff said.
Another stereotype. You are so badly informed, it is appalling. Not to mention how you immediatly move to some 'you're a shill!'-type of defense, which is another bad habit of people particpating in this place.
I am not interested in Bitcoin, nor in Bcash. Both are equally flawed and have no real world value as a token. What's the point even in using such slow vehicles for the transfer of money, especially if you take the transaction costs into account? Also: who is actually using BTC to buy things? That argument was strong in 2013, and is still strong in 2017: BTC's value is 99% speculative in that sense, and bubbled way out of proportion. I still do not believe merchants would use such a means to transfer value from A to B that swings so much in value, nor do I believe that any government would allow BTC (or any simular alternative) to get too big as it would be highly undesirable from a legal point of view.
Ripple is just on the rise now, and will be on the rise for some longer. I cannot complain by the way, especially about 50% drops, as I'm already up from a half a cent per XRP to $2.05. Seems like I didn't deserve 1000% gains, but much more than that.
You could have that as well you know: the only thing you had to do is look beyond, do actual research and compare the usecases of various cryptos. But you didn't - and that's your punishment. You (someone that jumped into BTC in late 2017 judging from your account creation date ) will likely ride the BTC titanic down to the bottom of the sea, and still defend it vigorously. That's the real irony here.