Author

Topic: What's wrong with this picture? (Read 464 times)

vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
February 10, 2016, 02:52:56 AM
#5
Can't see the picture, but is this about the court case involving Butterfly Labs from April 2015?

This thread is about dates and times and not about any one entity that the articles are about.

Either Google is at fault or the system is being gamed. That's the gist of this thread.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
February 09, 2016, 09:30:00 PM
#4
Can't see the picture, but is this about the court case involving Butterfly Labs from April 2015?
vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
February 09, 2016, 07:51:55 PM
#3
the top link is a crawl of a article wrote in 2013
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/bitcoin-developer-receives-first-butterfly-labs-asic-1364858475
it was
Quote
by Vitalik Buterin

............................................................

12:21 AM GMT Daylight Time
April 2nd, 2013

............................................................


the second link is from january 2015
http://coinjournal.net/return-butterfly-labs/

Quote
By Oliver Carding - January 8, 2015

i think google 'dun goofed' and recrawled old websites.. maybe google found the articles had been updated is some minimal way (spelling mistake or update of website code) that tricked google into thinking it was a new article.

to me this is just a failure on googles part

I'll accept your assessment, albeit I honestly was leaning toward a consorted effort by the entities somehow adjusting their time- slash daystamps for the ranking juice, hence starting this thread to see if I'm correct or in error in my assessment.
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
February 09, 2016, 07:40:50 PM
#2
the top link is a crawl of a article wrote in 2013
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/bitcoin-developer-receives-first-butterfly-labs-asic-1364858475
it was
Quote
by Vitalik Buterin

............................................................

12:21 AM GMT Daylight Time
April 2nd, 2013

............................................................


the second link is from january 2015
http://coinjournal.net/return-butterfly-labs/

Quote
By Oliver Carding - January 8, 2015

i think google 'dun goofed' and recrawled old websites.. maybe google found the articles had been updated is some minimal way (spelling mistake or update of website code) that tricked google into thinking it was a new article.

to me this is just a failure on googles part
Jump to: