These hardware wallets also run software, I dont really see your point here.
Yes - agree. But this "hardware" is in a unique controlled environment:
1. Impossible to rewrite the bootloader - other than changing the unit.
2. Loading a firmware that is not signed by the HW manufacturer creates error messages every time it is booted
There is more, you can read about it at: https://doc.satoshilabs.com/trezor-user/advanced_features.html
Still an attacker needs physical access to the device (be that an old laptop or the hardware wallet), which IMHO is more likely with a hardware wallet as its easier to carry around. Its also unhelpful to go into a thread about problems with a bike and suggest to use a car instead.
The only guy that came close to successfully attacking a Trezor is this guy - he turned out to be a white hat.
I set my Trezor in dual mode, ready for the $5 attack - you know, the guy who threatens you to break your skull with a $5 wrench from Home Depot... They get my Trezor, I give them the PIN, but they only get my "change" wallet - where I keep less than $50 worth of BTC. They don't know it, but on the same device lies a wallet with thousand of $ of BTC with an encrypted passphrase... That is how secure Trezor is.
But they have your trezor wallet too, which costs like $100 if I am not mistaken
And this can be done with electrum too, I can keep 2 wallets and if robbers attack me, I give them the seed for the one with not many coins. 
Point is they're both very safe, no point in arguing one is better than the other.
Anyways this is all offtopic, OP close this down before a mod kicks all of our asses.
