I think I understand the answers,
I think you probably don't.
but also suspect the question is not being asked correctly.
Or, more likely, you're asking a question that doesn't make any sense and therefore doesn't have an answer.
I am thinking quite a bit different. Presume someone creates a new private key and a new public address.
Then it exists. If they created it in their mind, then it exists in their mind. If they created it with pencil on paper, then it exists as something written on paper. If they created it with wallet software, then it exists in the wallet software.
If, before doing anything else, search all the nodes and all the existing blocks and that public address will not be found.
Well, if they created it within their own node, then they'd find it there I suppose.
My perspective is that it does not really exist in the BTC world.
You're really going to need to either spend more time understanding what I wrote above, or do a better job of explaining what you mean by "exists".
I currently presume that when someone initiates a transfer that results in coins being deposited in address X
You're on the technical support subforum asking a technical question. As such, you're not going to understand the answers to this question until you understand and accept these facts:
- "coins" don't exist in bitcoin.
- There are no addresses in the blockchain nor are there addresses in any standard bitcoin transaction
- Nothing is ever "deposited" anywhere when a bitcoin transaction is created, broadcast, or confirmed
- As far as the Bitcoin protocol is concerned there are no "accounts", there are no "balances". Wallet software can add up all the individual transaction outputs and display it to you as a balance, but the blockchain and the transactions have no knowledge of such balances and don't need to.
this is when address X is first instantiated when it first becomes part of the BTC world.
It is not. Nothing is "instantiated". The address doesn't "exist" any more after that transaction than it did before. The only thing that changes is that, using a standard set of rules to convert the transaction output scripts into simplified form to display to humans, other nodes and block explorers can display that data in a format that we all agree to call an "address" when they inspect the transaction.
It is when the BTW world first becomes aware of that specific address.
Is this a valid statement?
No.
It would be a valid statement to say that once you tell someone an address, then they will know about the address.
It would be a valid statement to say that once an individual node receives a transaction, that node can determine what the transaction output scripts are, and any other software (such as a wallet or block explorer) that interacts directly with that node can convert that output script into the standardized address format for display purposes. Other nodes that haven't yet received the transaction will not know anything about the transaction outputs (or address) unless they have received an identical output script in some other transaction.