When will wealth difference rules of court be officially acknowledged in the US

Kluge

donator

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1015

You hereby agree we waive all rights to use the court system and will instead use an arbitrator. If a case should somehow go to a court system, we waive the right to a jury trial. You agree all disputes filed against Conglomo will be filed as an individual and not as part of a class action and will not result in punitive damages.

You agree to not share any details of our operating agreement in any piece or form, digital or analog. You must post the following on your website:
"I am shit, Conglomo is grand. Conglomo gives me money in exchange for "advertising services," which is the full extent of our relationship. Conglomo neither acknowledges the content of nor endorses anything on this website or by its operator, its employees or contractors. My shitty shit is in no way connected to Conglomo and any misrepresentation by me is punishable by termination of the operating agreement Conglomo has generously extended to me."

We reserve the right to terminate the operating agreement at our discretion, without warning, and for any reason.

TYPE FULL NAME HERE:

username18333

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Knowledge could but approximate existence.

Quote from: u9y42 on January 10, 2015, 01:59:39 AM

. . .

Quote from: saddampbuh on January 10, 2015, 01:32:05 AM

probably never, the gap between richest and poorest has been growing for some time with no end in sight

Precisely. Which goes to his point that, as that is in effect the state of affairs, society might just as well recognize it and move on - I disagree we should go about it that way, as stated in my previous post, but it seems a fair point to make nonetheless.

(Red colorization mine.)

It is a peculiar fellow that acknowledges a rise yet trips over it anyway.

u9y42

legendary

Activity: 2562

Merit: 1071

Quote from: Possum577 on January 10, 2015, 01:28:35 AM

NEVER!

Why would this every happen in the US, a democratic and capitalist society? It goes against everything the country was built upon!

I'm not so sure it really goes against anything the country was built upon, at least looking at the views of the "founders"; but regardless, it is already, and has been for a long time, the status quo.

Quote from: saddampbuh on January 10, 2015, 01:32:05 AM

probably never, the gap between richest and poorest has been growing for some time with no end in sight

Precisely. Which goes to his point that, as that is in effect the state of affairs, society might just as well recognize it and move on - I disagree we should go about it that way, as stated in my previous post, but it seems a fair point to make nonetheless.

saddampbuh

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1014

probably never, the gap between richest and poorest has been growing for some time with no end in sight

Possum577

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

Loose lips sink sigs!

NEVER!

Why would this every happen in the US, a democratic and capitalist society? It goes against everything the country was built upon!

alan2here

hero member

Activity: 1778

Merit: 504

WorkAsPro

Sorry, wrong way round, meant 'more' wealthy.

As this is almost as things are at the moment, seems better to offically recognise than try and thinly disguise.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1368

Quote from: alan2here on January 09, 2015, 09:51:15 AM

Such as, legal action against somone some number of times less wealthy becoming illegal.

Well, if the poor guy is a thief, he would have to check the income tax returns of the rich guy he was robbing, to make sure the rich guy was X number of times wealthier than he.

As he grew wealthier from all his stealing, he would have to be sure to under report his net worth so that he could stay within a certain litigation protection range. After all, he wouldn't want to have to rob wealthier people who might have armed guards that would shoot first, and maybe not even ask questions later.

Cheesy

EDIT: Could the poor thief get insurance that would protect him in case a thief X number of times poorer than he stole all that wealth he had been thieving over the years, since he couldn't litigate to get it back?

u9y42

legendary

Activity: 2562

Merit: 1071

Quote from: alan2here on January 09, 2015, 09:51:15 AM

Such as, legal action against somone some number of times less wealthy becoming illegal.

I don't think we should look at it that way - abuses would still occur, those less wealthy would still be at a disadvantage, and so on. I would much rather the legal system wasn't pay to win at all. Tongue

alan2here

hero member

Activity: 1778

Merit: 504

WorkAsPro

Such as, legal action against somone some number of times more wealthy becoming illegal.

edit: Sorry first two posters, bad typo originally.

Topic: When will wealth difference rules of court be officially acknowledged in the US (Read 592 times)