Author

Topic: Where are the thin clients? (Read 1414 times)

legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1004
Firstbits: Compromised. Thanks, Android!
December 13, 2011, 11:32:53 PM
#20
What happened to being able to trim down the block chain? I like the idea of having a client that doesn't rely on any server, but doesn't take up 2GB of space per copy.

I think our digital wizards are still working on that... it'll be some time yet.
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
December 13, 2011, 08:04:15 PM
#19
What happened to being able to trim down the block chain? I like the idea of having a client that doesn't rely on any server, but doesn't take up 2GB of space per copy.
member
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
December 13, 2011, 07:45:58 PM
#18
Bitcoinspinner is awesome for street activity. You just have to remember to change wallets from time to time, depending on how paranoid you like to be

And, of course, keep the real program at home seeding Wink
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008
If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat
December 13, 2011, 04:30:18 PM
#17
But it is fundamental to the survival of bitcoin.

Since bitcoin is a decentralized and peer 2 peer thing, it need as many nodes as possible relaying blocks and having the full blockchain
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
December 13, 2011, 04:26:12 PM
#16
What makes these clients "thin" and secure?
Thin: it doesn't download the blockchain. It connect to a server and ask to it info about it.

It's secure cause it work like a normal client, it have it's wallet and the private keys and simply ask to the server info about the blocks and how many btc do your wallet have.

The wallet stay on your computer, the server NEVER see it, never require the private keys.
Surprised they don't recommend thin client instead of official client. Downloading block chain takes forever...
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008
If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat
December 13, 2011, 09:21:37 AM
#15
What makes these clients "thin" and secure?
Thin: it doesn't download the blockchain. It connect to a server and ask to it info about it.

It's secure cause it work like a normal client, it have it's wallet and the private keys and simply ask to the server info about the blocks and how many btc do your wallet have.

The wallet stay on your computer, the server NEVER see it, never require the private keys.
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
December 12, 2011, 10:10:00 PM
#14
What makes these clients "thin" and secure?
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008
If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat
December 11, 2011, 11:05:27 AM
#13
I think it is really dangerous to use any online bitcoin clients.
Yes but.. where are the online clients here?
sr. member
Activity: 409
Merit: 251
Crypt'n Since 2011
December 11, 2011, 02:38:26 AM
#12
The thin client I am referring to is the one Satoshi exemplifies in his Bitcoin paper.   
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1004
Firstbits: Compromised. Thanks, Android!
December 10, 2011, 10:53:43 PM
#11
Not sure if it technically fits the definition, but BitcoinSpinner is a very simple, working Android app that doesn't download the blockchain, but let's you view the balance of and send transactions from a single keypair (which is stored on the phone, not the server it connects to.)
legendary
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1137
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
December 10, 2011, 10:04:12 PM
#10
I think it is really dangerous to use any online bitcoin clients.
Exactly what risk are you talking about for these clients?
member
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
1h79nc
December 10, 2011, 09:46:42 PM
#9
I think it is really dangerous to use any online bitcoin clients.
There are risks involved with everything. If you understand the risk and trust the provider, they are no different than any other financial institution.

Thin clients definitely make sense for tons of situations. Just downloading and verifying the entire block chain can be a huge hassle for mobile and embedded devices.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
December 09, 2011, 03:42:04 AM
#8
I think it is really dangerous to use any online bitcoin clients.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
December 08, 2011, 05:32:15 PM
#7
Don't you also need to point the electrum thin client to an electrum server?


I'm pretty sure all thin clients need to be pointed at a server.  Hence the "thin" part.  There are currently 2 public electrum servers up.  Electrum doesn't require giving the server your private keys though, so it is secure.
sr. member
Activity: 409
Merit: 251
Crypt'n Since 2011
December 08, 2011, 05:28:02 PM
#6
Don't you also need to point the electrum thin client to an electrum server?
legendary
Activity: 1896
Merit: 1353
December 08, 2011, 09:19:02 AM
#5
The one I know of is Electrum http://ecdsa.org/electrum/

Personally haven't tried it yet so can't speak if there are any issues with it, but is ugly as a sin on windows (uses GTK).

hopefully Electrum will soon have a Qt gui
sr. member
Activity: 270
Merit: 250
December 08, 2011, 09:03:58 AM
#4
http://strongcoin.com
http://blockchain.info/wallet


you can backup your priv keys yourself so if the site disappears you still have your btc's
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
December 06, 2011, 10:55:35 PM
#3
http://blockchain.info/wallet

The best thing of this online wallet is, it's stored on the server after encryption.
full member
Activity: 235
Merit: 100
December 06, 2011, 07:54:15 PM
#2
The one I know of is Electrum http://ecdsa.org/electrum/

Personally haven't tried it yet so can't speak if there are any issues with it, but is ugly as a sin on windows (uses GTK).

sr. member
Activity: 409
Merit: 251
Crypt'n Since 2011
December 06, 2011, 07:31:36 PM
#1
Why hasn't anyone developed a Bitcoin thin client using bitcoinsharp or bitcoinj.  Is this in the works somewhere or do I don't know what I'm talkin about?
Jump to: