~snip~
For concerned/curious reader like, here are few reference i found
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17392386
Thanks for the link you provided
After several inquiries, I have decided not to follow that path, for the following reasons:
- I believe that software quality is generally better when people write it for fun, than when they are getting paid for it.
(it is not a question of competence, it has to do with long-term commitment to fix the things you do wrong.)
- I would not be having fun if I was working for VCs.
- I believe that the Silicon Valley model of development (grow fast, pay investors later or die) does not suit well Bitcoin.
- As far as the company is concerned, I prefer organic growth. (maybe it has to do with your typical Bitcoiner's debt aversion syndrome).
I was very impressed by what he had to say. He was truly an extraordinary person with great dedication and ideas. I think he is a person who can enjoy his great contribution with electrum and he can have fun with it, most people would look to benefit from their contributions and ideas, but it doesn't seem to be the case for @ThomasV
Hopefully electrum can be a good portfolio for ThomasV, and he will get other benefits for his dedication to electrum