My final decision is I will leave my miners at first pool kano.is for one month and will update.
These are my configuration of my miners atm and will be for one month.
0 stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333
1 stratum+tcp://stratum.antpool.com:443
2 stratum+tcp://stratum.antpool.com:25
Thanks
Depending on where you are located, kano's pool has other locations that may be a better option for you. The best way to figure out which one works best (i.e.: is closest) for you is to ping them and check the response times.
Kano's nodes are:
- US: stratum.kano.is
- US: nya.kano.is
- DE: de.kano.is
- SG: sg.kano.is
- JP: jp.kano.is
- NL: nl.kano.is
and all of the nodes listen on these ports:
in case you have issues getting through firewalls.
I live in the US on the east coast so I'd consider using stratum.kano.is and nya.kano.is:
ping -c 10 stratum.kano.is
PING stratum.kano.is (104.194.28.194): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 104.194.28.194: icmp_seq=0 ttl=54 time=100.933 ms
64 bytes from 104.194.28.194: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=100.200 ms
64 bytes from 104.194.28.194: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=100.376 ms
64 bytes from 104.194.28.194: icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=100.377 ms
64 bytes from 104.194.28.194: icmp_seq=4 ttl=54 time=100.882 ms
64 bytes from 104.194.28.194: icmp_seq=5 ttl=54 time=100.505 ms
64 bytes from 104.194.28.194: icmp_seq=6 ttl=54 time=100.561 ms
64 bytes from 104.194.28.194: icmp_seq=7 ttl=54 time=100.863 ms
64 bytes from 104.194.28.194: icmp_seq=8 ttl=54 time=100.172 ms
64 bytes from 104.194.28.194: icmp_seq=9 ttl=54 time=100.743 ms
--- stratum.kano.is ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 100.172/100.561/100.933/0.268 ms
ping -c 10 nya.kano.is
PING nya.kano.is (104.207.132.42): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 104.207.132.42: icmp_seq=0 ttl=53 time=34.476 ms
64 bytes from 104.207.132.42: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=34.157 ms
64 bytes from 104.207.132.42: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=34.907 ms
64 bytes from 104.207.132.42: icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=34.257 ms
64 bytes from 104.207.132.42: icmp_seq=4 ttl=54 time=35.185 ms
64 bytes from 104.207.132.42: icmp_seq=5 ttl=54 time=34.080 ms
64 bytes from 104.207.132.42: icmp_seq=6 ttl=54 time=34.635 ms
64 bytes from 104.207.132.42: icmp_seq=7 ttl=53 time=33.699 ms
64 bytes from 104.207.132.42: icmp_seq=8 ttl=54 time=34.291 ms
64 bytes from 104.207.132.42: icmp_seq=9 ttl=53 time=33.556 ms
--- nya.kano.is ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 33.556/34.324/35.185/0.477 ms
So for me it would be better to use nya.kano.is, but I would then put one of the other nodes as a backup pool, and then for my third pool pick a different pool altogether, and now knowing what I know about p2pool, I'd use one of the public p2pool nodes.
edit: added port info