Topic: Which campaign is better? Bounty campaign or Signature campaign? (Read 626 times)

If you are looking for income then  bounty campaigns and signature campaign can give you what you want to have  as long as you are in the right ,legit campaign and in legit manager then you can earn but now before you you joined anyone of that you've mentioned then you must keep searching about that program if that is legitimate that can pay you in the end of duration. But for me both are goods  it's up to you if where you feel comfortable

Actually, bounty campaigns can still be a goal if the place for promoting crypto doesn't grow, but in fact, the place for promoting crypto projects is growing. In the past, they only knew one place to promote crypto projects (Bitcointalk) which could get a targeted market.

Unfortunately the forum can't keep up with developments in the crypto project promotion ecosystem, this whole thing is actually not a problem because the purpose of the Forum isn't to promote crypto projects but to share knowledge about Bitcoin.

Signature campaign focused just on the forum and advertisement aren't done outside of the forum but bounty campaign covers every social media sites and also signature campaign. Signature campaign must not have a limited slots, if you have the money you can open as many spots as you want. Everything depends on how much the companies is willing to spend on the campaign.
My signature campaign stake.com has allocated more money to their signature campaign than other projects on the forum, others can do the same and hire more posters to advertise for them on the forum but the results will be limited to those on the forum. Bounties will increase your presence on social media that'll help bring new investors and engagement to your project.
For a project that has so much money allocation for their marketing budget, they can do both bounty and signature campaign or instead of using tokens for the bounty campaign they can make used of bitcoin or stablecoin because it'll attract more participants that'll want to earn some money. Other project has done bitcoin paying bounties on the forum and were successful.

The managers can say more on this and we’ve got some really experienced once on the forum in the likes of CryptoprenuerBrainboss, Icopress, Hhampuz, Royse777 and a host of others.

Still, it’s largely a thing of choice as the CEO on what you’re bringing to the crypto centric space on what would seem perfect for a promotional strategy. Certain ideas back up promotional strategies on/across forum and off forum.

The forum stands the most populated crypto involved and conscious users on the planet and with that at heart, starting a project that has got a huge part of it to be crypto related and doesn’t stern from the forum, your left with a huge probability on how much patronage you would get. Of course you’ll get some but with the fact that all or at least 80% of users here are deep in crypto, your promotion might be met with a significant growth.
On that, what users attach much values to from my judgement is signature campaigns.

Bounty on the other hand can be both on forum and off forum. On forum in the sense that, you could offer signature benefits within a bounty thread and off forum by carrying out all the social media campaigns. This would take your publicity through a wide coverage as it engages a part of the forum and across social media.

Good one you’ve fired up with bounties and hope it’s been good with you guys this far.

This is a misconception about bounty. But you are still a beginner, although, by the date of registration, you could be more active and achieve more. In my experience, the bounty only takes up useful newbie time, time that could be allocated to reading and understanding the basics of crypto and Bitcoin, as well as chatting on the forum.
The times of good profits have already passed, like five years ago, but there are still people who say that the bounty will enrich them.
I still see rookie accounts that never leave the bounty reports section, although, by the age of their stay, they could be legends.
What's wrong with you?

Knowing that bounties have got signature campaigns as well. No doubt that the signature campaign is way better than the bounty. Because in most signature campaigns, there's the fund escrowed by the manager and the same is there for bounties but not at all times.

The problem with the bounty through social media is that the platforms that are being used to share the project as per the requirement of these bounties are they're becoming strict. That's causing them to detect those tasks to become a spam on their platform and that's why they're putting such activity into notice and then results into banning of the accounts of the participants, this is commonly happening in Facebook and Twitter.

Both campaign has its own value.  As i can see you choice bounty campaign which is right choice. Although signature campaign always plays strong roll to promote a project but bounty campaign is better in my opinion cause then your project will be promoted on facebook, telegram, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube as well as wherever, where lots of people can know about your project. Even social media influencer can help you a lot to spread your project among People.

I would like to agree with your words, Currently, the condition of the bounty campaign is very worst. For this situation I will not blame just only the those scammer project. Day by day the increasing of the scam project also there increased those type of participants who were just copy and paste the same post tweet etc and also have dozens of alt accounts. Show currently I would say for smart people now bounty campaign can be no goal

In my opinion, when comparing the two, signature campaigns are a good option, but bounties are excellent for beginners.

Its good to see FireDao Team took Our opinion about their project's bounty and finally they offered bounty campaign Where signature also included. and i think both are helpful for a project. Signature campaigns are best way to draw investors attentions, this forum has lots investors, even more than your imagination. On the other hand, bounty campaigns are also good way to promote a project all Over the social midea, although most of hunters spamming most during promotion but thus way is also helpful to attrack investors for your project. And there are lots of real project, they got successful without any bounty or promotion. So project quality is matter first than promotion.

Signature campaigns are a part of bounty campaign.
As you can see almost all members wearing some or other signature and you can understand the importance of signature campaign.

Other bounty campaigns are like social media campaigns are also important as they can spread your words outside this forum and the reach of social media is big you can get many adopters for your project.

A combination of both signature campaign and airdrop campaign can be more effective though.

You are describing the good points of a signature camping from the point of view of those which participate on it, while the OP is asking this question from the point of view of the one behind the signature or the bounty campaign, and depending on their goals one can be better than the other, the best point of a bounty campaign is that they get to pay using their own tokens, so they can literally just increase the number of coins they want to create and pay their bounty hunters this way at no cost to themselves and their investors.

Signature compaign is much better than bounty. Signature will produce quality poster and active forum member. reward is on the weekly basis and most of time btc were given to users. The only problem with signature is limited spot. Bounty is good for users who cannot make quality post and also their rank is newbie and cannot participate in signature. bounty have more spot and thus more users promoting project

Both are best for promoting a project but many investors are always active in social media sector. If you can promote social media sector then many investors can get your project easily. But if you ask profits about bounty hunter then i can said that signature campaign best. Because few people work on signature campaign and many people work on social media channels so where tokens are less available.

Social media promotion must also look at how many followers they have and their influence on social media. if it's only an account with low followers it won't matter. But the more people who join the campaign, the faster the promotion will spread. The signature campaign remains number one, because it focuses on this forum and many members of the forum also become investors etc. But if the target of the campaign wants to be broader, then more campaigns are created such as Articles, Tiktok or YouTube videos and many more. It all builds a good reputation for the project being promoted and builds a strong brand.

Signature campaign might be big impact on a project because here participated a lot of top ranked members and they spread it by their quality post’s on the other hand i think also social media campaign can be big effect to advertising a new project, i agreed that they spamming but real hunters will make good promotion in their twitter specially.

Hello everyone, thanks for showing us lots of precious suggestions and advices. Now, we're here to announce that we have finally come to the conclusion and has launched our very first bounty campaign.

The bounty campaign is managed by Brainboss. He is definitely one of the most reliable and professional bounty manager in the community. Hopefully the community here can pay the attention to the campaign and we are expecting to deliver the best project ever in crypto world to the community.

Here is the link to look into it:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/distributed-firedao-bounty-4weeks-9-platforms-3-millions-flm-5457755

Thank you.

The inclusion of a signature campaign in a Bounty campaign is a notable choice. Undoubtedly, the signature campaign stands out as the superior option when compared to other bounty campaigns due to its higher rewards resulting from lower participation. If you are seeking to enhance the reach of your project, I would suggest opting for a social media campaign such as Twitter, Facebook, or Telegram.

There is just as much publicity for scam projects here. It would be naive to think that on a site where scams are not moderated, there will be fewer scam projects. They even manage to advertise scams that pay in bitcoins here, and you can't even remember about advertising campaigns with payment in tokens. The percentage of scams there has always been extremely high.

Signature campaigns can be part of bounty campaigns, as most of them, if not all, have them included. I believe what OP meant was to ask what is better, to pay in stakes of the token or coin they are developing or in BTC currency weekly, like traditional signature campaigns do.

Without any doubts to launch a signature campaign with weekly payments in BTC or any other solid altcoin is the best alternative. It will give a lot more credibility to the project, more visibility on services section (exclusive for BTC currency offers) and it will be possible to demand more qualified posters from higher ranks such as Hero Member and Legendary.

Even better would be to launch different campaigns, but all of them paying in BTC and separated in different threads. Example: signature campaign, twitter campaign, facebook campaign and so on...

The answer is always signature campaign because bounty campaign is only full of spam and users in altcoins section is mostly don't care about the brand their advertise. However even though you've plan to launch a signature campaign, it don't mean your project will be successful. If you're not know the forum work, it's better to hire an experienced manager. You also need to offer better rate and promise the campaign is focused for long term, most of very high quality posters already participate in other campaigns, so if you have a better offer, you can get a very high quality poster.

The most important is to find the best and prospective project for campaign. Not all the projects will be able to survive in the future and it is very important to sell the tokens in the right time to have some profit at least.

Signature campaigns are best imo, I remember several projects just cause they were advertised here, the catchy the signature design, the better. Social media bounties are worthless, they are spammy and gives bad impression to project, avoid it at all costs.

I'd say bounty campaigns are useful if you're trying to promote your coin to the world as well as wanting to spread the coin itself to people as rewards. Sadly afaik Bounty campaigns can be considered dead already, back then yea it was flourishing, right now? Not so much.

Signature campaign is really more used to advertise about your services instead of a product. It can be catered though if you really wanted to use it, and it's pretty prevalent in the forum as well after all.

I always thought that the signature campaign was one of the bounty campaigns. however, if we take them apart, then I prefer to participate in signature campaigns rather than bounty campaigns. it's just that, if you intend to promote the project you are working on, then to maximize the results, then the best choice is both. that's because the bounty campaign and signature campaign will cover all areas, so almost all sectors can see advertisements from the project you are developing.

For broad project marketing purposes i highlight the two platform you mentioned because they have big community which is very helpful to market project but it would be nice in this forum also very necessary to hold signature campaign and bounty campaign also by making a lot of marketing strategy expected opportunity can materialized to attract public interest and investors to enter

if we talking about bitcoin talk community it's definitely a signature campaign, yeah it's only available with not so much hassle doing it, or you can just advertise on the forum directly on every page, there is somewhere on the page where you can bid for ads in this forum.

Both are good just how to maximize each campaign for Attracting investor, but in my opnion social media campaign is the best place for promoting our product, you should have mission list for participate to be complete their mission of bounty campaign, Don't focus on bitcointalk only, you can search in like airdrop campaign on gleam.io , zealy.io , or cooperate with some admin airdrop on telegram

I think bounty campaign on bitcointalk is a good one because everyone here knows a little about crypto and majority if not all owns a wallet and have invested in one or many coins, so i think bitcoin signature it's great, i am not a fan of social media unless you are target a crypto groups

In my opinion, i think it is better if you have both the Bounty Campaign and the Signature campaign together on the forum. Why do i say both? Bounty campaign helps your project presence on social media platforms while the Signature campaign promotes your project presence on the forum too. If you are looking for an example to observe or follow; you can check Seasonal Tokens campaign here on the time.

Every campaign manager has good management, they will certainly arrange the desired plan according to the client. You have to discuss it with a reputable manager. I think in this forum there are many lists for OPs to choose from one of them.

Bounty campaigns and signature campaigns are both the same, it will stick with the bitcoin paid signature campaign, it will be more interested in some quality posters, the manager will choose the best participants, you also have to have a predetermined allocation to run this campaign.

It will be better if you can run both Bounty and signature.

Both of aren’t same, Signature campaign is more significant in promotion then Bounty. There are lot of BTC or Stable coin rewarded
signature right now, but how many bounties offering in Stable coin? Definitely Signature is worthy here mostly payment in Weekly but there are no guarantee in bounties campaign. Of course both of different.

Bounty campaigns help promote a project on social media, and increase followers on official social media accounts.  and grow the community on their Telegram or Discord servers. But Signature Campaign doesn't do these, it only promotes a project within the forum. Social advertising is very important if your project has a token and needs to sell those tokens. However, signature campaigns work very well for gambling sites which is why you will find almost all long term signature campaigns on this forum are gambling related.

I guess both campaigns has its requirements. If you can fulfill the requirements of the signature campaign, it's better to join the signature campaign because most of the signature campaigns pays in Bitcoin. But, almost every bounty campaign pays in altcoins and there are no guarantee that you will get paid.

don't ask only here with a topic, but try to reach some campaign manager here in bitcointalk.
there are several users with a strong reputation that have managed both initiative (bounty or signature...)
there are many items to be evaluated and addressed and each service has different goal / budget etc etc...

I think it depends on what the prospects you've for the project are. I know there are shrewd investors who lurk on this forum for projects to invest in. Such investors are going to take projects that run their adverts here more serious than projects they stumble on Twitter, IG, Facebook or even Telegram. In the past, many people picked projects they invested in from Twitter & co until they started realising most of those projects were scam. I think that sort of scared so many off investing in things they see on those social media. However, if you ever choose to make it strictly a bounty campaign; make sure to make the payment in stable coin on a weekly and not stake based. That way you will get handles that are very much active with great stats for engagement, not just accounts that will post without others viewing and reading what they've posted.

My suggestion is to use a signature campaign that is paid like using BTC payments because if paid tokens or some kind of bounty is held in altcoins it is always a worthless and useless token so that the payment is not proportional to the performance of the worker, that's why currently at the bounty event the campaign is very lack of interest from active users of the forum as most of them in altcoin bounties are fraudulent projects.

But it all comes back to your project budget and your campaign team, make sure to use the best campaign manager on this forum using BTC payments will make more sense so you get workers who work optimally to bring traffic to your site. try to run your campaign in next 1 month run your project signature campaign and you can see the traffic you get from this forum.  

both bounty and signature has own value. as mentioned by others too I will also say that with signature compaign we will see quality poster because competition is high and only few spots available. this is the reason everyone will work on his post to be selected in signature compaign.

bounty will open the door for spammer and cheaters (multiple accounts). The only benefit is for non English speaker can  do various social task to make money and also project can get shilling by paying less. If proper rules make for bounty then I think bounty could also good

I believe that it's the bounty campaign who is prominent at that time since every projects at that time has gotten its value rising after being listed on an exchange. Bounty campaign slowly degraded after it enters the bear market where more and more project has become a scam and bounty participants lose their will do join knowing that they can't gain something from it. Signature campaign is average at that time but big gainers comes from bounty campaign as far as I remember because I joined some bounties.

This is where all sorts of problems lie when choosing a specific solution. If we choose a signature campaign, we minimize the use of bots, but we reduce the spread of the project, the number of participants involved and increase the budget. Large-scale campaigns are very expensive. If we choose a bounty, we increase the risk of bots, but the budget decreases and the spread of the project increases. The golden mean is extremely difficult to find, especially if you have limited resources for the campaign.

in 2017 bitcointalk signature campaign is on its top performance, many investor looking in to our signature to define where to put their money. but so many scam project or failed project. now it is still useful for link building for your project because bitcointalk is the oldest forum for crypto related. and this is why i am still and still reading new reference from here.

If only within the Bitcointalk community then the signature campaign is better than the bounty campaign because you can attract the best poster here in the Bitcointalk community, but if its a crowdfunding you should extend your campaign to popular social media like Facebook, Twitter, Tiktok, and Instagram and search engine campaign like posting in popular article sharing sites like Medium
Just avoid shilling marketing where people are interacting to give false testimony about a project, this is not going to work and will give a bad reputation to the project.

I think the better one is the signature campaign and it will target the real users. When it comes to bounty campaigns, anyone who can create multiple accounts can participate. So this is not good for the project long run.

Advantages of Signature campaigns :

1. Target the real users
2. It will remove the bot types users

Advantages of Bounty campaigns :

1. Higher number of users can participate
2. More popularity of the project

The bounty campaign and the signature campaign are the same, there is no difference because they are part of the bounty program,
the only difference is the percentage of prizes, it's just that for possible bounties on twitter, facebook and tiktok the prizes can be small because many people participate,
if you want to earn a lot on bounties Your campaign must write articles, YouTube, or signatures.

It's all depends on the projects budget  and your preference...

And from my experience, over the years have seen bounties pay way over what a signature on average would pay on average because bounty manager negotiated for a good deal and limited the number of entrants to make everybody's time worthwhile ,  but these days it seems a little different because of the nature of how how these bounties have no cap, bounty coins aren't pushed on big exchanges and the list goes on..

But ultimately if you want certainty in pay signatures are the best, but if you prefer a bit of a 50/50 gamble of getting paid peanuts or a potential of catching  a gem then bounties should be your go to place, otherwise it's all about preference.

Both are good. What is better depends on your interests and your skills. Good luck.

Bounties are more in quantity than signature campaigns. If I can not join signature campaigns because I am a newbie, can not meet criteria from signature campaigns, I can choose bounties as my alternative jobs.

I don't think it is bad choice for a newbie but I will consider your advice more. I don't want to join bounties and waste my time and end it with nothing.

Both bounty and signature campaigns can be effective ways to promote a project or product, but they have different advantages and drawbacks. Bounty campaigns typically involve a wider range of tasks such as social media promotion, content creation and bug reporting. This can help to generate more engagement and awareness for the project, as well as identify potential issues. However it can also be more difficult to manage and track the various tasks and submissions. Signature campaigns on the other hand, focus on promoting project through forum signatures and other online forums. This can be more targeted and easier to manage, but may not generate as much engagement or awareness. Ultimately the choice between a bounty or signature campaign will depend on the specific goals and needs of the project, as well as the resources available for managing and promoting the campaign. A combination of both approaches may also be effective in certain cases.

I will also says signature campaigns, based on what this community is all about, that's why this community become one of the well-known as it started this whole signature campaign first that pays in bitcoin and then later it evolved in bounty paying campaigns which is in token.

And historically, there are bounty that didn't end well, becoming a scam, and so the project failed miserably and then participants complaining about the rewards and so there are scam accusations on a bounty campaign. So for me it's better to go for signature campaign first and then measure how effective it is.

bounty is when you need all rounded exposure, but signature is all about credibility of your projects.
there has been many platform offering bounty tasks for some project like galxe but honestly these bounties are just good to give your project presence in the social media but does it make your project interesting
in term of being looked as some kind of reliable project in which everyone gonna trust? hardly.
since many of bounty followers are usually just some farmed social media accounts I don't think anyone gonna take your project seriously.
at best they'd consider the project just like some other random project out there.

when talking about marketing in this forum of course I will choose a signature campaign because signature campaigns are only used for marketing in this forum. but if you want it to be more effective, you should also add social media campaigns such as Facebook and Twitter so that your marketing will be wider and your project will become more widely known.

In terms of exposure, since @OP is looking for a service that can give them more exposure, I think the bounty campaign has a better reach than the signature campaign.  A bounty campaign is the composition of different marketing approaches such as a Telegram campaign, signature campaign, YT video campaign, translations, and more.  Even though most of the bounty campaign is plagued by a spammer, there are also quality posters joining the bounty campaign.

Sig camps all the way. Bounty campaigns can be good too but usually they aren’t. In the past some people got rich from the bounty campaigns but that was during the ICO bubble and everything was going up. Sig camps on the other hand provide a steady income. You don’t get any surprises with them. Bounties are like lottery tickets. If you somehow find the right one it will mie you rich but most of the time you will be working for free.

In bounty campaign have section signature and social campaign ok so you can participate anyone which you can do. Although now very low rewards bounty still progress so many hunter working in social campaign so if you gonna participate signature then you can received a comfortably money.

Comparing bounty campaign and signature campaign, signature campaign is definitely ahead and signature campaign is much better than bounty campaign. A bounty campaign can be managed by any member but managing a signature campaign requires a lot of skills which not everyone has. Then most of the bounty projects are scams while most of the signature campaigns are successful. Anyone can work in bounty campaign but if you want to work in signature campaign you can't work till certain rank up. if you consider the overall aspect signature campaign is much better than bounty campaign.

Without citing your project marketing priority or urgency, everyone is hardly able to suggest the one that suits your needs. Except, you don't know anything at all about it and rather want to see how the community decides. Though, it is still a ridiculous decision. Here is the thing, generally, to create buzz on social media, bounty campaigns are better due to their characteristics. In regard signature campaign, it might spark some discussion here but surely a limited one.

For a detailed plan or well-thought and reasoned explanation, you better reach out to a prominent campaign manager. Especially the one who already manages various campaigns with a diverse sector of project. They should have know and be able to suggest which one truly satisfies your current/future plan or roadmap.

Marketing is the main mantra of any business. Every project is driven towards this goal of promotion. But my opinion is that although there are different types of marketing, signature campaigns are the heart of the forum today. Especially in signature promotion the forum is filled with many experienced and influential people. Bounty campaigns don't make much profit but currently signature campaigns are a source of income. There are many types of cheating in Bounty. The right reward for hard work is through signature campaigns that pay participants directly in dollars or BTC.

For now signature campaign is better because if a bounty going to successful argument then we can got some money. But you can't get money from social media campaign because there lot of participate even for social media campaign have unlimited hunter so that's why a crazy thinking. If you have participate social campaign then you can get 3-5$ something for 1-2 month bounty.

I think a new project needs both a signature campaign and a bounty campaign. As you can increase the social reach of your project through Bounty campaign, similarly through signature campaign you can attract the attention of various investors in this forum and gain the reputation of your project. Initially I think it would be better to have a bounce campaign to stabilize social media.  Later, signature campaign will always maintain the visibility of your project for long term. But in this case, I will have a suggestion for you to hire a well-reputed manager to promote the campaigns. From here you can hire reputed members for your required services
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5406507

I think both are great ideas. You can try to recruit heroes and senior members to join your signature campaign. And you can get junior members to participate in bounty campaigns such as social media and creator content. Both are the best choice depending on what kind of promotion is your priority.

Signature is the best one and i think social media is a good too. Don't forget to choose the right bounty manager because it will have big impact for your bounty campaign. There so many good bounty manager in this forum, i believed irfan_pak is one of the best bounty manager in this forum.

Bounty campaigns are campaigns to promote the project on social media (Twitter, FB, Reddit, Linkedin, ..etc.) by bounty hunters, and there are many other different campaigns such as translation, content creation, Youtube Videos, and so on, and bounty hunters are paid at the end of the project’s tokens. As for signature campaigns, they are promoting the project in the forum by seasoned members here, according to rules that the signature campaign manager sets, and he must be a trusted and professional manager with a good reputation, and his account must contain positive trusts, and the participants in the signature campaign are paid in Bitcoin or any top currencies in the market, and my advice to you is if you are not ready to deal with the escrow service, as they reserve the bounty or the signature campaign tokens that will distribute at the end to the participants, do not think about launching them, and if your project is not 100% complete in development and complete in all aspects so take care of developing it first and finishing everything, before you think about promoting it through trusted bounty managers because you will usually find it difficult for them to accept your offer.

If it is to promote the project, eitherway is fine. But if it is the way to reward the participants and for the project itself, I think signature campaigns (pays in btc) would be better. One reason is what happened before. There were many bounty campaigns paying rewards in form of the project token. Profit is way bigger than with signatures, but it has something to do with long term progress of a project. The moment bounty hunters recieved their rewards, they tend to sell it immediately which causes a huge dump with the token's market value, affecting long term potential of the project.

And for participants' end, I think signature is still better in a way that it has a fixed reward in btc. Indeed bounties will give you instances of way big  rewards but there'll also be times you'd be recieving small from a 3-month work.

Just run all of campaign at once and you will not confuse to pick which campaign that will better for your project. I think that if you will never able to determine it as the campaign has their own purpose but the main thing that must be remember if you shall become a trusted developer who will be paying your participants. It's not only hit and run.

Signature campaigns remain the best in this forum. But bounty campaigns like Twitter, Facebook, Tiktok are also very good for project owners so that their projects can be promoted on social media.

Signature campaigns give bounty hunters some money. And social media campaigns also provide the opportunity for bounty hunters to participate in more than one campaign.

I think both are great campaigns for project developers or for bounty hunters.
I think the video campaign is not good. My reason is because there are many video campaigns whose results are really bad. This is just my personal view.

at the moment I only participate in the signature, since at the moment at least some money is paid for this bounty, it makes little sense to participate in the rest, since they pay a penny, it used to be possible to participate in all social bounties and you could earn well, but this is already a long time in the future, just like airdrops, today they pay very little

There are still bounty campaigns that has a signature campaign inside of it. There aren't that much but it still exist on some bounty campaign that has a manager. We can see the decline of trend from before and today, I still believe on bounty campaign that still has a signature campaign on it. Knowing that they are willing to pay extra to signature codes and to a bounty manager but if the bounty doesnt even spend anything, it would be a redflag for me.

Base on your story, I think I'm one of the few users here that are kind of lucky at that time then.

We have different story in terms of bounty campaign back in 2017 to around 2018. Every campaign that I joined, I always get the tokens from it, and luckily I manage to sold every one of them. I only joined in a few bounty campaigns (around 5 I guess), and all 5 of them paid me the tokens, got listed in an exchange, and manage to sold all of them. That was the time where ICO are still hyped. After months of joining in a bounty campaign (paid with tokens), I stopped it already, and focused on campaigns which are paying Bitcoins.

Somebody correct me if I'm wrong with this one.

Bounty campaign is a general term consists of different types of campaign like Social media campaign, Telegram campaign, Blog campaign, and so on, and so forth. Signature campaign on the other hand, is one of the campaigns under the bounty campaign where you wear signature to advertise the project here.

Many think that signature campaign nowadays is different from bounty campaign, but back a few years ago signature campaign is one of the campaigns under bounty campaign. Now to answer your question OP, signature campaign (paid thru Bitcoins) is more effective than just bounty campaigns (different campaigns). Well, you can do trial and error. Hire a reputable manager here, try both campaigns. One where you are paying the participants with your own token, and one using Bitcoins.

They can only be effective for services that work with bitcoin. If the goal is to promote a new altcoin project, then a signature campaign paid in bitcoins may not be as effective as Bounty. As an example, you can think of the altcoins that tried to be promoted through a bitcoin signature campaign. They all had extremely short durations and ended quickly, whereas Bounty campaigns can last for months.

For me, both can be utilized to be a good marketing arm for your platform, get into signature campaign first, bitcoin paying and then see how it goes for you, maybe 1-2 months.

And then shift to the bounty campaigns, regardless of what it is, twitter, signature campaign and others. This will be the second layer for your campaign. But this time, it should be longer than the bitcoin paying signature campaign and it should be big as far as the number of participants. Just get a decent manager to run it for you.

Signature campaigns only in this forum mate. Signature campaigns are indeed effective within the Bitcointalk community as managed by experienced and qualified managers. Additionally, participants in signature campaigns are often influential and knowledgeable members of the forum, which adds credibility to the campaign. If FireDAO aims to expand its reach beyond the Bitcointalk community and target a global audience, then running a bounty campaign might be more suitable. Bounty campaigns can help grow social media presence, increase engagement on platforms like Twitter, Telegram, and Facebook, and encourage the creation of content to reach a wider audience.

Signature campaigns are the best option in my opinion as they offer weekly payouts at certain times. These Compaigns are limited and only allow participation by users who have accumulated sufficient Merits in the last 120 days which helps filter newbies and ensures higher quality posts. Participation in signature Compaigns requires cryptocurrency knowledge and experience allowing participants to discuss Bitcoin and other altcoins while gaining valuable information about the market. In addition a significant portion of campaign funds is often held in escrow to ensure payment security. Overall signing events provide a regular stream of income and require hard work quality and continuous skill development from participants.

Just from their names, the difference has already been mentioned, if you're interested in conducting a bounty campaign then you're making your payment in bounties but if you're interested in making payments in bitcoin then the best idea is on the signature campaign, you could now see that it's your choice and and preference especially the organization you will be managing under base on what they prefer to offer their campaign participants.

True, I rarely (almost never) see a high-rank and well-known user still do signature bounty that's paid not in stablecoins nowadays. It's common knowledge that signature bounties, especially those that are paid in low-volume tokens are the 2nd tier promotion here.

---

However, I understand that bounty is a good method to distribute your token, but if the dollar value of the token is not worth it, you'll only attract low-rank or spam accounts. It goes the same for the article and social media, you'll only attract article spinners and fake follower posts.

One of the solutions for this is to hire a reputable Bounty/Campaign Manager to screen the trash work. I previously work with Hhampuz, Roycilik, and Yahoo, and they are legit.

We assume that you have budget to run this campaigns so maybe its really better if you run both of campaigns since for sure you will covered up all the areas of this forum and maximize your presence for doing that.

Also hire a reputable campaign manager to get good advice regarding on this discussion since their expertise can help you to expand your brand here.

It depends on your budget. Actually, both types of campaigns can be good as long as they are managed well. I recommend hiring a reputable campaign manager, even if they charge a higher fee compared to typical campaign managers. This way, you can ensure great results.

In my opinion, signature campaigns that pay in Bitcoin can be very effective. You can find more active members who contribute to the forum, rather than bots who just post for the sake of earning money. To make your job easier, look for the best campaign manager available.

If you're looking for a campaign manager, I suggest posting in the services section. Typically, the best ones have lots of recommendations and feedback from forum members.

Bounty campaign and Signature campaign both have different significant i think, if you want to promote your project in social media especially twitter then of course i will recommend bounty campaign, although here so much spam and bot users. On the other hand, Signature is very popular in this forum, when you will launch a BTC payment signature campaign and selected quality members then your project got good promotion i think.

Have you seen the current state of the bounty program on the forum? there are too many newbie - members there, and after some time ago I checked, there are lots of accounts that are connected to one another, which means they are just taking advantage of the opportunity. I'm still in my opinion that the bounty program is no longer relevant here, it's better to use another platform. But for signature campaigns, it's still relevant and effective.

Yeah. Back around 2017 and 2020 when I attempted to join one bounty, it was just like a hit and miss kind of stuff. You never know if your 3-month work would be worth it in the end. When ICO became like a hot topic, it was just like being visited slowly by scammers until nobody even dared to do ICO bounties anymore.

Not sure if airdrops is like considered to be "bounty campaign" since back then, they were like separate stuff but to this day, I heard that there were still some airdrops worth doing, but the risk is just getting shitcoin into your wallet.

Although to be fair, the way that bounties work back then were still effective, not sure if they still do Twitter, Facebook, Reddit bounties, but with that campaign, you have plenty of audience that could open their ears and eyes for your project depending if your project is worth visiting.

First of all, they are both bounty campaigns. Singature campaign will give you visibility in here. If you do campaigns anywhere else, i want to suggest that don't push people retweeting, or writing their own spammy tweets about it. And spamming in the telegram is a sure way for me not to get interested. Fake onversations that are transparent ads are annoying as well.

You can just use requirements like changing a profile pic and background pic and some link to description etc. Less invasive is more appealing form of advertisement.

I prefer signature campaigns. In addition to distributing more rewards, signature campaigns can also increase knowledge about crypto through posts in threads. Also, what I like about signature campaigns is that we don't have to create post reports every week.

You can always do both if you are willing to advertise your project to both audiences because one of the indications that the project is legit is when they have a signature campaign which is paid with bitcoins or you can have the rewards both bitcoins and your coins because the participants will love to participate if they can assure some earnings. Additionally, you can also hire a trusted manager like Hhampuz to manage everything for you in terms of your signature campaign.

For marketing on Bitcointalk, of course, signature campaign is the answer, I don't see bounties still being effective here. There are much better platforms out there that you can use for bounty programs, for example like Galxe or Zealy (previously Crew3).

That is an option if you are only going to make 1 program out of the 2 mainstream programs on the forum, but it would be better if you implement both programs on the forum and also continue to use the mainstream platforms out there too.

If your target audience really is here in this forum, for me, the best is signature campaigns because there are fewer spammers and mostly high-quality posts from those who joined that campaign. It is also more successful in signature campaigns than in bounty campaigns because there are instances where a lot of low-ranking members can join, and there are also multiple accounts that joined that bounty, unlike in signature campaigns where those posts are high-quality and high ranks users here. But again, this depends on you, as most casino owners that will advertise their casino here are doing signature campaigns and not bounties.

What efficiency do you expect here? The contribution and communication as well as the support of users to your project is more, I think it is not difficult to approach it in the bounty environment, but it is also necessary to put it back in the position of bountyhunters, many projects with bad behavior created to attract supporters and their failure to meet their initial promises has also turned them into enemies of the community, if your project is really strong enough then the campaigns marketing will be strongly supported by people and vice versa. Here you can also easily find BMs, they have experience managing operations and distribution in campaigns, you may need to contact them directly.

I have seen projects done the same thing at the same time. So if you can do that then that means maximizing the potential of your marketing and aside from that, you can also do marketing outside the forum.

The impact of signature campaign can be felt long term and if you're for the quick results then that's not for you.

But if you want bounty and you want to get into socials, then that's what you should choose but you can't avoid those spam bots that will join your bounty.

Signature campaign is only in Bitcointalk. It is the best one if you want to advertise the project here by hiring best posters to work for you. Best posters will want to be paid for their works, with high pay rate. They are keen on payment methods like Bitcoin or stable coins like USDT or BUSD.

If you want to advertise your project on more channels like Facebook, Twitter, Discord, Telegram, Linkedin, Youtube, bounties will be your best choice. In bounty, you can include a signature campaign too.

Bounties have many participants are bounty hunters, farm accounts and you can not have quality works from them. It is biggest disadvantage with bounties and your team must think about this big minus. If you hire them to work, you must pay them at the end and should not run away like "we are disappointed with your works so you won't receive any payment". It will cause something bad on your project reputation.

In my understand a bounty campaign and a signature campaign are not really different things. A signature campaign is just a form of a bounty campaign because you can also do campaigns on twitter, facebook, telegram or wherever you want. That being said if a project is offering multiple campaigns, then the signature campaign here in this forum is usually the one that gives the highest rewards per user because telegram bounties are usually flooded with thousands of participants and on twitter it is similar.
A signature campaign is more work for the participants and should have limited spots in my opinion.
Also you would need to make sure that the bounty is really attractive to participants. Either you are offering USDT, USDC or BTC as a reward or you make sure that you own token will be worth something when the participants are getting their tokens.

You should have set up a poll to get the real sentiment and vote of the members here, for me signature campaign is better because you can get the best marketing for your project, Bitcointalk is the most visited platform when it comes to anything and everything Cryptocurrency and Bitcoin.

By launching a signature campaign that pays with Bitcoin or any tradeable coin in the market, you can hire the best posters that will show the visibility of your project to the investing community through their signature space.

Just pick the best manager here that can pick the best poster I highly recommend Hhampuz for this type of marketing.

If you have what it takes to revolutionize the blockchain world as you said and other marketing height you want to achieve, first you have to look at trust. Trust in the sense that which of the two would attract high ranking members to your project. For a long time, the bounty has been flooded by scam and unfulfilled promises which has put more user off from the section and I don't know what kind of beautiful package that you will put out on the bounty section that will attract reputable users on the btc paying campaign to bounty. So the trust for bounty is in question but if you use the signature campaign, you are certain to get the best publicity that will expose your project more.

The second point to note is where do you get trusted managers in the forum? It is with the signature campaign you get that. The managers do due diligence to ensure they run projects that won't disappoint them especially when it comes to the other end of fulfilling btc payment to participants in the project.

It’s based on the every person,because some need of immediate money for their regular expenses.For them,I will suggest to use of the Signature campaign which paying bitcoin.Because the weekly payment will be used for the daily expenses.Even you can support your family with out job using the bitcoin paying signature campaign.But this is not the fact in Bounty campaign.Bounty campaign will pay and but they pay more dollars then the bitcoin paying signature campaign.



Since the project is based on the altcoin,you can do the bounty which includes the signature campaign.So that your project get marketing in all the social media including Facebook,Twitter,YouTube.When you include signature campaign in bounty,you get marketing in bitcointalk forum also.

If you want to maximize the advertising of your project, then Bounty is the best, because the coverage of the audience will be much higher, due to the involvement of social networks of participants, in which they will perform tasks.

If we're talking about users, of course, it's better to use signature campaign, because the payment for posting in such a campaign is higher than in Bounty, where participants are paid with tokens of dubious value.

Whichever will pay (more).
In recent years, people will prefer signature campaign since it usually pays on time and therefore less risk for the participant. I still remember gathering all the stakes and getting pennies at the end of the bounty campaign. A lot of my article bounty also got plagiarized and received less stake. Hence, it's not worth it from the participant's point of view.

If you are serious about your project and have the required capital, BTC paying signature campaign is the way to go.

In my opinion, signature campaigns are the best and make my heart flutter and also the heart of this forum, because signature campaigns are managed by the best and qualified managers. Likewise with the participants who are filled with great and qualified and most influential people in this forum, and I don't know much about campaign prizes in detail. But the truth is that some of the bounty campaigns I've been involved in have turned up nothing, and only a small percentage of them were profitable at the time.
and signature campaigns are income and work that I can do regularly for a weekly paycheck, and I think of it as work that I have to do really well. And this is just my opinion, but both of them are involved in it and what stands out the most is the signature campaign rule that we have to work well, be very careful, and also be able to improve quality.

Alright, I appreciate the enthusiasm, but let's take a step back for a moment. How about focusing on building a solid foundation for your DAO before diving into marketing campaigns? I want to see a strong and sustainable infrastructure, a clear roadmap, and a talented team behind FireDAO. Without those elements, all the marketing in the world won't be able to sustain long-term success.

It depends on the kind of marketing team you hire and also your target audience. Back in the day, Bounty campaigns used to a thing with both the projects and bounty campaigners mutual benefiting and then came the cheats, bots and spammers

Lately it just seems completely pointless.

On the other hand, signature campaigns (bitcoin paying) have been doing quite well in the forum. I am talking about Bitcoin projects like crypto casinos, Bitcoin Mixers, Exchanges etc. as they attract quality and high rankling users and not spammers and account farmers. If your target is outside the forum, you will have more creative to reach your audience.

We are a bunch of ambitious folks on a mission to revolutionize the blockchain world. Our goal is to create a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) that empowers individuals and organizations like never before. Together, we'll shape the future of blockchain technology!

We're planning a series of marketing activities, and we want your input on bounty campaigns and signature campaigns. Which one gets your heart racing? Which of these two campaigns do you think will work like magic for FireDAO within the Bitcointalk community and beyond? We trust your expertise, and we want our marketing efforts to align with your preferences and expectations.