Author

Topic: Which Jurisdiction was best with prophylactic for the great pLandemie? (Read 60 times)

sr. member
Activity: 854
Merit: 277
liife threw a tempest at you? be a coconut !
I am very curious, it seems to be that most decision makers went like mono maniacal low iqs to only and only one weapon in "the gravest most dangerous pandemic known to mankind" : experimental injection.

it seems super logical to me, only one weapon in a "war"... it's so smart, astute and reflective of their immense common sense.

to take a funny example, they decided to go to war with submarines, and only submarines (in reality it was more cavalry even with Gatling guns invented...).

But maybe, in this vast world there are some areas where health authorities haven't been taken over by the experimental injections extremists? like zinc, vit. c, d. HCQ, ivermectine... or it's the full on hive mind 0 divergence allowed?

you note that I don' use the word "country" it seems a little bit archaic and stupid...

anyway... enjoy the "inversers" show.
Jump to: