Michael Saylor, who is known to be one of the strongest enthusiasts and believers in adopting Bitcoin.
OR he is doing it just for the business. Be honest to yourself. Saylor may love Bitcoin, but do you think he loves Bitcoin for how great it is or for the profit he is about to ingest?
All this Micro Strategy hype will end when Saylor decides to sell a HUGE chunk of Bitcoin. Which will be both good and bad anyway. While it would cause a lot of doubt and fear, it will push a lot of Bitcoin back to multiple holders rather than a single entity.
Does adoption mean not selling Bitcoin at all? Does adopting gold, for example, mean you keep it forever? of course not.
Also, there is no conflict between adoption and profit, if someone can adopt an exciting idea and also profit from it, where is the problem? This is what Saylor does, as he truly embraces Bitcoin, but when he has an opportunity to profit, he is sure to take advantage of it.
False adoption is like what Elon Musk did, where he claimed that he adopted Bitcoin in the beginning and contributed to the rise in the price, and when he found a suitable opportunity, he immediately sold his Bitcoin and made a statement against Bitcoin, while Saylor, on the contrary, remained committed even in the most difficult moments that passed through his company.
But this does not mean at all that he will not sell part of his Bitcoin or shares in the end, because he is a businessman who cares about profit, and he is also a company owner who has expenses to spend.