Topic: Which One of This Features of a Coin Would Make You Invest Your Time and Money? (Read 268 times)

At the present time the problem of a project is whether the community has support and investors love it or not.
Most of these crypto projects now have very good technology, but very few projects have achieved success. The success of a project depends on the majority, and for the majority not many people know about technology.

I checked the price of MOSS it is growing. I think that now many people understand that we live in one planet it is very important to protect the planet for our children.

Surprisingly, there are a lot of coins that are full of factors yet but still cannot achieve success.
For a coin to be successful depends on many factors, including the promotion of the product and having a strong team behind it supporting it.

I don't know anything about what you are shilling but just to answer the question, store of value is my pick.
Long-term holding.
Instead of just relying upon banks with all your money with just a little interest then, I would rather choose a cryptocurrency with a good future.
So the features of the projects will be next and so on and forth.
Everything is important in the end.

Anti-51% attacks. No man, why would I invest my money to make 51% attack possible anyway? Also, to get that much mining power I would need huge amount of investment, bigger infra ever built by all the miners until now. It is next to impossible thing to happen currently. In fact I would say I am Anti-(Anti-51%) guy who would mine for nominal profits from the daily mining and be happy about it. 

I am investing my time and money into crypto because of its ever growing popularity in the world. It has just started with all this and the journey is still pretty long considering the last bitcoin to be mined after 100+ years. So I know very well that I am pretty secure about my investment. 

Wanted to write that I can't choose one without other important features on the list until I noticed this at the end of your post: "what if I say hacash has it all". The list doesn't have other important features though but it is better than just choosing one feature.
A cryptocurrency has to have the main important features of decentralized cryptocurrency existing together to be considered safe by me.

We have coins with all those features already and they are already exist abundance like thousands of tokens with the same idea. Then you need something special about the project to be invested like the real use case that just bump and dump coin.

Well decentralized is what I care the most that's why I first invested in Bitcoin.
I don't want any authorities to be involved with how much I hold.
I am quite puzzled on what OP wants to point out.
Is he promoting a coin or making up a discussion to be talked about here?

Fair distribution is the most important and that includes #7. That's why I invested in RVN and 0xMR, both are POW projects with no premine or dev wallet.

So actually, the point of your post is only here, introducing or promoting HACASH. I don't know how it is and also not willing to know it. Moreover the si not yet in COinGekco.
New projects always claim having competed for perfect things that a cryptocurrency must be BUt, can they survive? Can they prove that they are the best and the most perfect ones?
No, The value can tell the truth

In fact a lot of coin has the same features not just HACASH. But the question, if those features are the ideal features of a project/token then how come that those project who has it are still not supported and invested by most of the people and worst, becoming declining daily.

I always pay attention to these characteristics. The value of the coin! There are a lot of BTC and ETH clones, but these tokens do not have the same value as ancestors.
Relevance is also important, the work of developers is also important. Blockchain creators must engage in the project and work on its improvements, otherwise, over time, vulnerabilities will appear that will lead to irreversible consequences.
News about growth, development, cooperation with other projects.

But the most important thing when choosing a coin is to discern its real potential in order to profit from your investment.

It's not even fair, the buyers of coins got nothing for their money and they can get only the coins from the miners. This is also making the network being controlled by the miners. The best thing should be the hybrid system that will let the buyers of tokens participate in the governance too. When there are lots of drama between miners and it will be making so many fork coins like what happened with bitcoin. Ethereum can't fix its scalability problem due to the miners.
This has proven if POW is not so good as people said.
It must be fair if the buyers, holders, and miners were able participating in the governance.

The more complete the features of a coin, the more it will attract investors to invest in these coins. The problem is that each coin has advantages
and disadvantages. So there can't be coins that have complete features. Therefore, if we find a coin that fulfills the 3 features that have been
mentioned the opening post is very feasible for investment.

Exactly. That is why Hacash stands out. The community is small, still, 1 HAC is valued at around $0.5. 

i like to do my deep research to a coin with no ICO and no premine also to an NFT project my friend
and usually when the project look good i will drop my money after researching

^ All of these features are considering as good while looking at a potential project that will we hope it gain in the future.
You can also have an insight into their goals and how useful they are in the community because all of these will probably they will claim that they had but the truth is they don't have that feature. But hey, what is store value there?
Nevertheless, I don't know what is HACASH, it is probably you are shilling now this coin to us.

As far as I know, store of value is not something hard coded or that can be coded into a coin or token, like some persons already said, it's earned, and a coin does not earn a store of value in a year or two, it have to stand a test of time for at least five years, and in each of those years, it must prove to grow in value each year more than it grow the last year, it must keep this record for atleast, five years before it can earn the title of store of value.
How can you even call a coin that doesn't have a value yet "store of value"?

But the sense of being an NFT is still there.

The arts that's being based on for NFTs are digital arts and almost anything that someone can put value in. Just like the first tweet of Jack Dorsey that I've seen and being valued at a high price and the highest bidder is Justin Sun.

Exactly, there's always new to see for each year when the hype for this kind of investment is gone. But specifically for crypto, specially the top coins, they'll never get out of the popularity.

I will always prefer this first. Most coins that have done well and have retained the value are of fair distribution, sovthis is my reason. Looking at bitcoin at 21million is example and many others. Many coins running in billions find it difficult to rise to give profit. This is what I see in picking that as what to consider first.

all claim to have it? and I don't care, because when you have jumped in and contributed to the field, it still won't be useful, because what is needed is consistency in each work that is built gradually and fixing the vulnerable gaps. Haven't there been many who have dedicated bringing each community to use these points? So why do we still find countless Shitcoin. Back again, which one can survive the swift flow of crypto that has elbowed each other between the chairs that only one left (CoinMarketCap).

I would have to say "privacy" is not as much important to me as other things, so that is the least important part, coins like monero or whatever one that takes privacy that seriously never peaked my interest. Real time offline settlement sounds like a bad idea as well, that sound way too dangerous for double spending, even if someone guaranteed me that there won't be a problem I still wouldn't trust them.

Most of these are not really that important to me, sure few like no premine is good but that is about it, rest do not really peak my interest that much, and that makes Hacash or whatever not that interesting to me neither, in the end it was something that was purely marketing here but the marketing was done so badly that whatever you wanted to achieve just failed for me, it didn't peak my interest and even made me aware of a coin that I didn't want.

It's not about how much features that available on such a coin. Even if the coin has all of those features and it doesn't mean that will be a perfect coin. The main consideration should be on the execution of the feature that already becomes the main focus for the token or coin.
Store of value can be owned only by bitcoin and I don't think another coin can be used as a store of value too.
I will prefer to invest in a coin that will have a good implementation of the feature and it's not only selling so many gimmicks.

When the interest of investors disappears, then they specially come up with something new to force them to part with the money. Now you will not find an ICO around which there would be such a stir as it was in 2017. Very popular at the moment are IDO, conducted by decentralized exchanges and which bring a large profit immediately after completion.

Crypto is a hype investment there is no exception, NFT projects are base on art which is realistic than most projects out there, between NFT is not for people who have money only, I also have some NFT I collected from Enjin and other projects under it, before they where worth little or nothing but now that NFT is making waves maybe my collectibles will worth something eventually.

In the Hacash Chain Hacash Diamond is not another NFT that can be minted easily and link it to an artwork. Every HACASH Diamond (NFT) needs to found using hashpower and also requires to outbid other miners with mined hac to be minted. So, it is a completely different idea.

As the first sentence of Hacash's white paper said: " We have reached the juncture of the era of monetary system reform ." The emergence of Bitcoin has pointed out the direction of change for us. There is no doubt about its great value, but this does not mean that we can get the best and final solution for the first time. After all, human beings always need to move forward instead of stop moving forward. The emergence of Hacash is just to prove: the only way to surpass Bitcoin to achieve the large-scale use of cryptocurrency in real business and daily life can only be better " monetary ", not other higher-end complex "blocks" Chain technology".

In addition to the lossless on-demand multiple privacy protection, full-category transaction payment, and asset change agreement, equity level control and multi-signature account system, historical witness anti-51% attack, handling fee offset, transaction custody, and other third-party services, There is a very important revolutionary creation: a channel chain network for real-time settlement of large-scale payments with the unlimited expansion of throughput. About this channel chain settlement network, you can read Hacash's white paper for a more detailed understanding.

It varies depending on why you want to invest and how long you want to hold the currency.

For traders or those who care about price, they do not focus on the technical aspects or how the currency works as much as supply and demand.
If you want a medium and long-term investment, then some other information is necessary such as decentralization, Anti-51% Attack, updating the code, and others.

99% of traders never read a single line of currency/token code

First of all, HACD is an indivisible NFT currency, and is the world’s first purely PoW-based NFT (again, note that Hacash is an invention in 2018), which means that it can be created at no cost by anyone today “NFT works” are different, each HACD is mined through algorithmic calculations, which consumes electricity like HAC and BTC. Each HACD is uniquely marked by an identifier with a length of 6 letters. It is not all 26 English letters that can form the mark, but 16 of them are selected: WTYUIAHXVMEKBSZN (As for why these 16 letters are chosen and the other 10 are discarded One, the author did not find a suitable reason in the white paper, nor did he get the answer in the community discussion, which seems to need to be handed over to future people to study). The number space of the 6-digit identifier formed by the 16-letter permutation and combination is 16 ^ 6 = 16777216, that is, the upper limit of the total amount of HACD is about 16.77 million. Since each HACD is unique and has a 6-letter unique ID as an absolute identifier, this allows centralized exchanges and other institutions to forge false tokens (that is, data smashed or sold beyond The real number of fake coins) has become impossible, and any attempt to modify the upper limit of the number of this currency is technically impossible first, so as to ensure that the wealth stored by everyone is not affected by the financial institutions of certain institutions. Manipulation or damage from community division behavior. And because it is indivisible and cannot be combined, a HACD will always be that one!

For deeper ideas, you may have a look at this article: https://hacashtalk.com/t/why-is-hacd-an-encrypted-asset-which-is-more-scarce-suitable-for-wealth-storage-than-btc/65

None. You are just not getting the point of investing (long term) in any crypto. It is not about attributes, it is about the people and talent that are committed to it and the community that is backing it. And I am not talking about a team of part-timers that do not believe in what they are doing of a community that has been bought by incentivising telegram groups. This is what matters:

a) A good idea that really adds value to a world saturated with shitcoins.
b) Backed up by respectable organisations, preferably old and big guys.
c) A committed team that shows constant development, versions, bug fixing and a kick-ass GitHub repository.
d) A community that has something to gain from the project, is large enough and is aware.

This is why it is so difficult to actually build a good project.

At this time i think a lot of top coins are also offering most of the points you listed especially the top guns like ethereum, tron, polka dot, cardano. So at the moment i do not think there is any real need for a new coin or project when we have established projects with proven record for this purpose.

I'm not a fan of NFT, it's just those people with huge money in crypto are playing with those claims in NFT. It's also a hype investment just as the ICO.
Although, I'm amazed to see that there's always something new that's brought in the market in different forms of investments.

They can claim to have all those amazing features, but the problem here is how the community will use it? How many coins have claimed to kill bitcoin because of their features, but how many really did surpass bitcoin? Yes, bitcoin has flaws but the challenge to these other alts, is how they can sell it to crypto community? How many will actually use their coin?

Almost every coin claims to have them all.

HACASH as a "store of value"? Cmon... Its not something you can implement. Its something you earn after years-decades being tested in a field. Its definitely not something a coin not even listed on CMC/coingecko has.

[/size]