OK I will play this game.
First one to send me 1000 BTC will get it back.
1ND9jsZ9H3PmATj4usHxgrZSv5RgkxgWMV
First one to send me 1000 BTC will get it back.
1ND9jsZ9H3PmATj4usHxgrZSv5RgkxgWMV
silly troll
just proving a point in my own sick twisted way
And what's that?
even when it's a little money you shouldnt give it to a untrusted person?
Because you wouldn't send him 1000 BTC ether?
Maybe it's something to think about, because it can look like a small amount you would send him.
But would you send him a big amount and expect your money back?
Why would you expect it with a smaller amount then?
Good point.
Well a micro amount is not a true test and no one would send my ridiculous amount either. It would be great research to see where the line became obfuscated but you would need a large random sample and a whole lot of, in this case, btc to reach any meaningful conclusion.
In my case the most that I have trusted is 3.3 BTC paying for a service in advance to an anonymous vendor. I did put a lot of trust into him/her and he/she did not disappoint. In my reality most people I deal with are 100% trustworthy.
