Topic: Why …? (Read 306 times)

I certainly would not wish for you to understand or not understand anything... according to the way you want to understand it. But I almost don't read your articles anymore because they are so bitter against Russia that it's bad for the health just to read them.

Why would I want to argue against your bitterness? All anybody has to do is realize that most of your info is based on other info that you wrote. So, it doesn't mean anything at all. It's all just you, ranting and raving over who knows what. So, go back into your corner and rant and rave.

Nobody can judge on your topics, because they are rants. You could say - if you wanted to - that the sky is green and that the grass is red. You could say it all day long. Who would argue with you about it? Until you bring real evidence that people can turn to and see if you are right or not, nobody would really care?

In addition, when you write in such big chunks that a person has to turn his browser sideways just to read it... who is going to take the time? Anybody can write chunks of words all day long. But if there isn't any use for people, why would they even want to read it?

If you are your words, then, yes... they turn other's ideals into stupidity. So, anybody who wants to listen to what you say without thinking, they will be taken to the grave by you.

  I understand that you don't like my articles and you are looking for a reason why I write them, finding the reason in the fact that I am a paid propagandist. The only way I can explain your attention to me as a person is in your inability to argue with what I write about Russia and Putin. This is the reason for turning to the author's personality instead of commenting on his topics. Let others judge how dishonest this is. By the way, I like your comments like these, because they convince me and my readers even more of the truthfulness of what I write. So, continue to participate in my topics.

In the event that you are not simply a propagandist, but sincerely believe what you write, watch this viedo to see what is behind it all - DR Lee Merritt and Dr Bryan Ardis - https://www.bitchute.com/video/KDeYswPUyRVc.

  Unfortunately, not all people understand, and this is the problem.

The problem is in the imperial worldview of the Russian people, and this worldview will disappear only in one case, namely, when the Russians are deprived of their empire. The West must understand that evil is rooted in the people, and not in one of its representatives in the person of Putin.

Unfortunately, not all people understand, and this is the problem.

More than that, I wish all people would understand why it is propaganda, and what the truth is.

There is little hope for this. The Russian people may come to their senses when the empire collapses.

I wish all 140 million Russians understood this.

Thank you

If more confused people read you, maybe they will have a mind.

I see the cataract medicine helped you. Thanks for the advice.

Me too. But you are closer to Putin. Go get them.

One that we have from Russia is N-Acetyl-L-Carnosine. It is, now, in a product called Can-C that is not from Russia. It is used to reduce cataracts in the eyes.

I would be grateful for any technologies that are useful to humanity and in which Russia is ahead.

Doesn't anybody realize that it is the Venezuelan cartels that rule... from behind the scenes, of course. Just ask Hispo. He knows.

It wasn't even the Russians who were the head of the USSR back when it still had the lust for conquering. It was Romanians. In the later part, when Gorbachev was the head, he agreed to dissolve the union with the condition that NATO would not expand to the east.

If Putin had the lust to conquer Ukr, they would have done what Netanyahu is doing to Gaza. But he is pushed to do so since there is still a threat to Russia with ATACMs. But many believe China is the goal. They know China will be next if Russia fails.

Russia is simply different with its technology. It is far ahead in ways that the US hasn't thought of. That's why so many nations are under its yoke... just like NATO is under the yoke of the US.

  Russia has always lagged behind the West in terms of technology and therefore has been stealing, sending spies. For example, the secret of the atomic bomb was given to the Russians by the Rosenberg couple, for a large reward, for which they sat in the electric chair. As for the Russian Empire, it has not yet collapsed, dozens of nations are still under its yoke, but like any empire, it will still fall apart.

How can one disagree with the truth that comes from Putin and his slave Nebenzya and which, as you said, is spewed out by you? I am glad that my topic is interesting to you, which is evident from your activity in it, for which I am grateful. Thank you!

Or, somebody could say the same about you and the 'facts' that you might dredge up.

Russia sure did an accurate job of dropping that multiple warhead missile on Dnipro. Or do you think that China did it for them?

Russia is not actually defending itself from foreigner conquerors, that is what Russian propaganda tries to push into the minds of people who are not informed enough about geopolitics, in reality Russia is just miss the old times when they used to be an empire and had more relevance than they currently have in the eastern hemisphere. When the Soviet Union was at its summit, it could rival against the United in terms of Economical growth and technology, there was a good reason it was called a superpower in the same way USA was back in the day. Nowadays, the power in the eastern hemisphere is not held by Russia whatsoever, it is held by China both military and economically speaking, otherwise Russia would not feel the need to ask for help to both China and North Korea as soon as the Kremlin is running out of people to fight and also electronical components for their kamikaze drones.

It's nice to hear you agreeing with the truth for a change... as opposed to all the lies you usually spout.

It is nice to hear that you have defined my article about the Empire of Lies as nonsense and your admission that you do not deny your similarity to the representative of the Empire of Lies, Nebenzya, at the UN, who is the most truthful person in the world after Putin.

Thank you for confirming everything I said. And thank you for strengthening it by pointing out that some joker named Nebenzya agrees with me. So, now that we know what the truth is, get back to your propagandizing.

Say, do you give away free cars to people who believe the nonsense in your posts?


West censoring Russia in ways it never tried with USSR – Glenn Greenwald

---

https://www.rt.com/news/608004-west-censorship-greenwald-tucker/
Governments in the West are obsessed with hiding information from their own populations, going so far as to criminalize the platforming of media such as RT, journalist Glenn Greenwald has said.

In an interview with Tucker Carlson posted on Thursday, Greenwald pointed out that throughout the Cold War, the New York Times would publish speeches by Nikita Krhuschev, Leonid Brezhnev and other Soviet leaders, contrasting it with the current situation.

”Now it’s practically criminalized,” Greenwald told Carlson.
...

---

 Apparently, the comment was written by Nebenzya (Russia's representative to the UN Security Council), who accused the West of creating a squad of combat mosquitoes.


I am glad that Nebenzya (the same BADecker) read this topic and actively participates in it, demonstrating fantastic nonsense and causing a smile.

All that you say is exactly the point. Russia and the Russian way is different than that of the US and Nato.

The US and Nato want to capture and conquer Russia. As I noted above, it's been going on at least since the Bolshevik Revolution. The Russian response is the same as any nation that was attacked... fight back.

You didn't see Russia trying to conquer the world. But that is what the US has been doing, first by conquering the nations of Nato. And then by trying to conquer the nations of... well, essentially, the rest of the world, even though the methods are different than the way Russia would do it if Russia were doing it. It's about time somebody fights back against US imperialism.


Biden's Lust for War

---

https://ronpaulinstitute.org/bidens-lust-for-war/
It was initiated by President Joe Biden and then-British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, both of whom advised Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that if he rejected a peace treaty that his own government had freely negotiated and agreed to in 2022 with Russian negotiators, Ukraine could join NATO. The treaty was more than 100 pages in length, each page of which had been initialed by both sides, and its essence accepted by the Kremlin and by Kyiv — until Biden and Johnson advised against it.

Their advice was essentially to trust their military support, as it would be strong enough to resist any Russian incursion into eastern Ukraine and relieve Kyiv of the need to make concessions to the Kremlin. They used Zelenskyy as a puppet, since their purpose was not motivated by peace or empathy or justice, rather by hatred for all things Russian.

So, the U.S. and the U.K. encouraged bloodshed instead of peace, confrontation instead of communication, and Congress began paying for a war without declaring one. Motivated by years of anti-Russian jingoism, headless of its duties under the Constitution, thumbing its nose at at least three treaties ratified by the Senate that permit war only when the U.S. or an ally is gravely threatened, Congress permitted Biden to start an undeclared war against a country that poses no threat whatsoever to the national security of the United States.

Here is the backstory.

The war began in 2014 when the U.S. State Department and the CIA engineered a coup against the popularly elected and neutral-leaning government of Ukraine. Much of Russian-speaking and Russian culturally oriented Ukraine in the east was unhappy with the coup. The American and British plotters then installed a puppet regime that actually began attacking Russian Ukrainians in eastern Ukraine.

The area of eastern Ukraine in which this government-orchestrated violence was taking place has been Russian in culture, religion and language since before the American Revolution. The American and British plotters of the 2014 coup did not expect the resistance that their coup generated. Yet, they looked the other way when the Ukraine government attacked its own people for demonstrating a decided affinity for Moscow over Kyiv; so decided, that the province of Crimea actually voted overwhelmingly to return to Russia.
...

---

I like how you point out pretty much all the Russian elite talks shits about the western capitalism and the western culture and yet, oligarchs decide to move their fortunes and live in countries which are pretty much contrary to the Russian vision of the world, such the United Kingdom.

The thing is, Russia has political ideas which show a lot of contradiction with western democracy, as a consequence their elections and their democracy is false and plastic, it is all settled for the maximum leader Putin to continue to hold on power as long as he continues to be alive and well.
In the end, Russia has turned into a living dead of what the former Soviet Union used to be and Putin wished he could turn into the general secretary of the now defunct communist party of Russia and lead over all the former Nations which were part of the Union. It is a fantasy of power, dreams of someone who wants to make as many people miserable as possible, under his regime of political terror and repression.

Here's why.

The only real reason for the USSR in the first place was the Bolshevik Revolution (BR). Who funded the BR? The US funded it, along with the help of the UK (United Kingdom) and others - https://duckduckgo.com/?q=who+financed+the+bolsheviks%3F&ia=web. Why did they fund the BR? They wanted the resources of Russia and Siberia. And they had to get rid of the Czar to do it.

But it backfired on the US. A strong leader, Stalin, took over, and wanted the USSR for himself and for the Russian State. Stalin's executions and assassinations were his attempt to get rid of the CIA-like groups from the US and the UK - get rid of them out of Russia and the lands of the whole USSR. They might have been overkill, but they worked.

The thing that the West can't seem to understand is that the people of Russia, and their leaders, don't want to be ruled by the US. Formerly - 1991 to 2014 - the CIA didn't have the control in Ukraine. But they got control thru election fraud so that a puppet government was set in place in Ukraine in 2014. This puppet government started attacking both Russians and Ukrainians in the areas of Donetsk and elsewhere. These areas were 'grey' areas. At times they were part of Russia; at other times part of Ukraine.

By 2022 Russia couldn't take it any longer. So Putin filed paperwork with the UN regarding his reasons for attacking Ukraine. The fact that Russia easily took the Black Sea Corridor, and other lands in that area, and that Ukraine can't take them back even with US and NATO help, shows that Russia isn't as weak as people think.

The Russian missile attack on Dnipro in Ukraine yesterday (check the timestamp of this post), shows the capability of Russia. If Russia had wanted, they could have armed those missiles with nukes, and set them down in the UK. As it is, they only took out a military manufacturing complex in Ukraine. Had Russia wanted, the UK would be gone. And there could easily be similar attacks against the US - New York, Washington DC, Atlanta, or any other major city on the East Coast - which would all be gone in nuclear fireballs.

Do you want it, US/NATO/Ukraine? As Medvedev said, "So, that’s what you wanted? Well, you’ve damn well got it!" Stop antagonizing Russia if you want a world left to live in... and if you want to remain alive to live in it.

Russia has a military capability almost on par with the United States and the Americans never want any other country to achieve a higher capability than them. That is why the United States cannot tolerate Russia and keeps harassing it in various ways, such as financial sanctions, trade sanctions, etc. The current world order is based on the defeat of the Soviet Union during World War II and the polarization of power that has emerged later, and they have taken strategic military action against countries that have spoken out against the Americans. However, this system will not last long and another change may happen soon in the world.

Alik Bakhshi

Why …?

 

    I don’t ask myself the question  What to do? I ask myself the question Why? Yes, why does Russia have serious problems with the West? Why is Russia perceived by the West as a pariah country. Russia has been expelled from the club of the “big seven” countries. Why are people in poverty in a country rich in resources? Why do all the former republics that once made up the Soviet Union avoid Russia, and some are even at war with it? Why is today’s confrontation between Russia and Western democracies worse than in the days of the USSR? So what is the reason? There are many questions why, which can be reduced to one big one – Why?

   It would seem that with the fall of the communist regime and the recognition of its ideology as vicious, which led to the collapse of the economy, which is why the Soviet Union actually collapsed, the reasons for confrontation disappeared. However, the democratic reforms that had begun under Yeltsin for objective reasons (the national mentality coupled with the great power, imperial worldview), which I mentioned earlier (1,2,3), gradually came to naught. Putin, whom I would characterize as a bandit-patriot, returned to the Russian people the conditions of existence they were accustomed to and the hope for the revival of the empire within its former borders. The hope that seemed lost after the collapse of the USSR. Since Empire and Democracy are incompatible things, today the Russian people have a tsar in the form of Putin and the boyars close to him living in luxury at the expense of robbing the people, and therefore hiding it from them as much as possible. However, the people do not particularly complain, because they accept this circumstance, which is familiar to them, as inevitable.

The power in Russia is thieves'. Tell me, what kind of person, for example, in France, would transfer money to foreign banks in someone else's name or buy real estate in surrogate names, unless he is a thief. All high-ranking government officials in Russia are thieves, because that is what they do, hiding the loot abroad. At the same time, they are liars. Their children live in enemy countries of the democracy they hate so much. Navalny, who wanted to draw the people's attention to those who are robbing them, never found mass support and found himself in prison. (4) If in Ancient Rome the people demanded "bread and circuses", then in Russia circuses have been replaced by a cheaper means - vodka. It would seem that everyone is happy, All of Russia lives in a lie, and is headed by the main liar - the zeroed out, that is, the lifelong president of all Rus' Putin. (5) The symbiosis of power and Russian society as a whole coexist in the created conditions. However, this has always been the case in Russia. Mayakovsky described this situation most briefly and accurately in his poem "The Party": "We say - Lenin, we mean - the party, We say - the party, we mean - Lenin." Similarly, We say - Putin, we mean - the Russian people. We say - the Russian people, we mean - Putin. (6) However, this analogy contains a very significant difference. Lenin was not ethnically Russian, and the core of the Bolshevik-Communist Party consisted mainly of Jews. The Bolsheviks had to achieve power through a civil war with the people, promising to distribute land to the peasants, and factories to the workers, which turned out to be a lie. With this lie, Russia as a state lasted for more than 70 years, until a vicious economic ideology, ignoring the laws of the market and suppressing the initiative of the individual, brought the country to a critical state. The economy, which for some time was based on pure enthusiasm and coercion, became ineffective and could no longer meet the ever-increasing demands of the empire's military machine. The very first democratic reforms that M. Gorbachev was forced to introduce in order to give a civilized face to the Soviet system or, as he said, to build “socialism with a human face,” shook up the patchwork empire so much that in the early 90s of the last century, it collapsed, splitting off countries that had republican status. The Empire of Lies turned out to be powerless against free speech, the power of which was first used by the Baltic colonies, after which the rest of the “voluntary brotherhood of nations” dispersed to poor apartments, leaving behind smoking hot spots. (7)

   Putin, who came to power, unlike Lenin, is a native of the common people, who grew up in the courtyard environment of St. Petersburg boys, whose motto, by his own admission, is: "If a fight is inevitable, you have to strike first." By the way, Putin's gangster slang sometimes involuntarily breaks out in his answers to journalists, which causes general delight among the people. Having won a small war for Russia, but a big one for Chechnya, Putin gained great love and support from the people. Having returned the rebellious Chechnya to the bosom of the empire, Putin simultaneously returned to the people the former imperial worldview, which had been somewhat shaken by the collapse of the USSR. Therefore, it is unlikely that Putin will lose power as a result of popular protest. Putin's lies, both in elections and in all other cases, do not bother the people and are even silently welcomed if they come from the authorities. Over 70 years of the communist regime, the Russian people have become accustomed to lies, which have become an everyday attribute.( Therefore, Navalny's attempts to open the people's eyes to the deception and luxury in which his servants live are useless. There is no point in showing the people the truth if they do not need it.

    However, the zeroed out one, without knowing it, "cuts off the branch on which he sits." Russia is the Empire of Lies, being also the Empire of Evil, since lies and evil are concomitant concepts, and everything would be fine if these concepts remained inside Russia, so to speak, for internal use, since they do not cause rejection by the Russian people. But the fact is that lies and evil spill out far beyond the borders of Russia. Putin uses the habits and methods of the St. Petersburg hooligan, in which lies and aggression are present, in politics, brazenly trampling on the accepted norms of the established international order. Here we come to the answer to the question of Why. The fact is that Putin is first and foremost a bandit who has gathered around himself people like himself, relying on whom he holds on to power, and using this power he protects them, in bandit jargon, shields them from the law, having turned the basic law, that is, the Constitution, into a whore servicing the criminal group created by Putin at the state level. In essence, Putin has created a criminal state in which Lies are, as in microbiology, a substrate for the vital activity of criminal elements dangerous to the world society. This is confirmed by the mass of crimes of a criminal nature emanating from Putin's Russia.

    The countries of Western democracy have had to face a gang of criminal liars, led by a hypocritical liar, blackmailer, terrorist and ruthless killer, trained in the KGB countries in the methods of the cloak and dagger and brazenly using them in front of everyone, both in his own country and outside it. It is not clear how the leaders of democratic countries allow themselves to meet and shake hands with a criminal whose place is in the dock of an international court. I am amazed how Western politicians patiently listen to the brazen, lying nonsense of the Russian representative to the Security Council, Nebenzya, instead of depriving the Empire of Lies of its membership in the UN, as was done in 1939, when Russia was expelled from the League of Nations for the same reason, for unleashing a war with Finland.

   For the successful functioning of the criminal state of Russia, as well as any state, universal popular support is necessary, and Putin undoubtedly has it. This leads to the unsightly fact that the Russian people are participants in the crime. I foresee objections that it is impossible to generalize and blame the entire people.

  What do you mean you can't generalize! If the majority, and the overwhelming majority, support Putin's aggressive policy towards Georgia, Ukraine, and along the entire perimeter of the empire, is this a generalization? No, it is a fact! This is the imperial worldview of the majority. What business do Russians have with what is happening in another independent country, we are talking about Ukraine? Well, they overthrew a corrupt president, is this a reason for the invasion of Russian troops? And this is happening with the complete unanimous support of the Russian people. This is the case when, in the words of Fazil Iskander, "the general stench is taken for the unanimity of the people."

   I will allow myself, so to speak, a personal digression. I am used to relying on facts. The fact that among my Russian acquaintances everyone is for the annexation of Crimea is a fact that corresponds to the imperial worldview. And this fact is enough for me to have a corresponding opinion, not only about my acquaintances, but also about the people as a whole. If it were the other way around, Putin would have no one to rely on. Remember with what jubilation the Russian people welcomed the invasion of Ukraine and the annexation of Crimea. I agree with you, there are undoubtedly people among the Russian people who understand that "defense (military) of the so-called "Russian world" in other countries is a made-up reason to justify revanchism, but there are significantly fewer of them. For example, I don't know any. It is quite possible that someone knows such people, which gives grounds for optimism, which I do not have. I know that for the majority of the Russian people, all other peoples of the empire are khokhly, Tatars, churks, black-asses, narrow-eyed and other infidels. And the Pindos!?
  
  All these definitions are very popular among the people. For example, I do not know of a case where the English also insulted the peoples that were formerly part of the British Empire.

   Knowing the answer to the question why ..., it is necessary to act accordingly.

    The only way to rid world civilization of the monster from the lizard era that has survived to this day in the person of Russia is to isolate it and not make the mistake of sending chicken legs anymore. The Russian Empire partially disintegrated, having suffered a defeat in the First Cold War, after the inevitable defeat in the Second Cold War, numerous peoples will finally gain freedom, and the Russian people, freed from the burden of the imperial worldview, which is the cause of constant aggression, will return to their original state of Muscovy and take their place among the democratic countries, realizing that the Empire and Democracy are nonsense. (

1. The people's fate or to each cricket his own hearth. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/28564.html
2. Great Russian chauvinism, and Putin its Fuhrer. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/21133.html
3. On the issue of the imperial thinking of a Great Russian. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/35178.html
4. Navalny - a test for the people. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/62241.html
5. Nobel for Tereshkova. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/51333.html
6. Russia and Putin - twin brothers. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/115185.html
7. When the donkey dies. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/3702.html
8.Импepия Лжи и eё глaвный лжeц. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/22317.html
9. Democracy is contraindicated for empires. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/23826.html

       11/22/2024