If vaccines really worked, then the vaccinated shouldn't worry about the habits of other people. The anti-vaccinators have concerns about the social costs resulting from Vaccine damaged kids, and they are saddened when they see the cripples and mentally deficient kids that have been created by the vaccination policy. You know there is major political corruption surrounding vaccines, when you become aware that the law was changed to protect the Pharma companies against having to pay compensation for the widespread damage they cause.
For the 200th fucking time the point is:
-Each disease needs to infect people to survive
-Depending on how contagious a disease is, there is a need of a certain fraction of the population not vaccinated to allow the disease to survive
-A significant amount of the population (about 2%) can't be vaccinated because they're too young, too weak or have allergies
So if adults healthy people like you or BADecker don't get vaccinated you allow disease to spread in a population and to touch those people.
But you already know all of this and chose to ignore it.
15k measles cases in Europe in last years, 90% of victims weren't vaccinated. The 10% vaccinated, guess what, had been vaccinated only once which is known to be not sufficient as you must at least get two shots and preferably two.
You know all this but chose to believe your "guts" over facts.
What you say doesn't make sense. Either vaccines work, or they don't. Of course there will always be people who they don't work for, and a few who will never need them. But if they don't work, why get them?... and especially when it has been proven, and is being proven more and more, that they are unsafe.
Look at it this way. If 10% of the population decides to NOT get vaccinated, who cares? If they get sick and go to the hospital, they will get vaccinated then, or they will die, right? They will lose their job, and some vaccinated person will take their place... if vaccines work, and the vaccinated people remain healthy, that is.
The thing that we are talking about is freedom to decide what you want to do with your body. For example. Let's say that the 10% of unvaccinated people decide to buy guns and shoot themselves in the foot. As long as they don't hurt anyone else with their guns, who cares? It's called freedom.
But if you are so scared that people who are not vaccinated are going to affect you, what good is your vaccination? Or are you trying to say that vaccines barely work, and that people who get them can still get infected. You don't make sense. And all the silly medical talk that says the same is simply run-around talk.
If unvaccinated people go out and infect each other, why should you care? It won't hurt you. In fact, you should be happy. After all, the Georgia Guidestones say that we have to reduce the population -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones. And you are against that?
Don't you realize that if all those unvaccinated people die, that somebody has to get their property? And you - a protected person - might be able to share in some of it. Are you so in love with all people that you are out there to take their freedom away from them because you know, so well, that no freedom is good for them? What about when it happens to you with something other than vaccines?
You don't make sense.