Topic: Why are Signature Campaign prices base on the rank? (Read 947 times)
Basically hero members must have more posts that newbie, so the price should be higher for heroes
Why are the payouts in sig. campaigns based on the user's rank?
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
People that offer signature campaign programme belief that the high your rank the better your post and that you are already an experienced member of the community and also you have people that could love their company just because you are wearing their signature. Code:
Rates:
Hero member : 0.0015BTC per constructive post
Sr. member : 0.0013BTC per constructive post
Full member : 0.0009BTC per constructive post
Hero member : 0.0015BTC per constructive post
Sr. member : 0.0013BTC per constructive post
Full member : 0.0009BTC per constructive post
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
Some campaigns pay more to "legendary" than "hero". This always seemed weird to me because you don't actually get a bigger space or any other extras with your signature when you get to "legendary". Also, I always found that bitmixer.io thing very strange---that they pay all ranks equally. That's why I jused to always just use the smallest signature when I advertized for them. They paid me the same but I got to take up less space on the forum for the same amount of payoff. In my opinion, everyone using bitmixer should probably be using the full member version unless they change this.
Regarding the hero to legendary gap, the only difference is the colour of the coin... and to some readers, maybe that's the difference it takes for them to click the link in the signature. It's crazy like that but that's advertising. A neutral trust legendary account is more trusted than a neutral trust hero account, to most people, as for the legendary member has been on the forum longer.You must be right about the color of the coin and/or some perceived caché in the term "legendary" vs "hero". But wrt an account having been on the forum longer, it's not necessarily the case. Legendary goes off at some random activity level above hero (although there is a ceiling). So there are hero accounts with higher activity levels than legendary accounts.
Some campaigns pay more to "legendary" than "hero". This always seemed weird to me because you don't actually get a bigger space or any other extras with your signature when you get to "legendary". Also, I always found that bitmixer.io thing very strange---that they pay all ranks equally. That's why I jused to always just use the smallest signature when I advertized for them. They paid me the same but I got to take up less space on the forum for the same amount of payoff. In my opinion, everyone using bitmixer should probably be using the full member version unless they change this.
Regarding the hero to legendary gap, the only difference is the colour of the coin... and to some readers, maybe that's the difference it takes for them to click the link in the signature. It's crazy like that but that's advertising. A neutral trust legendary account is more trusted than a neutral trust hero account, to most people, as for the legendary member has been on the forum longer. 
Why are the payouts in sig. campaigns based on the user's rank?
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
Code:
Rates:
Hero member : 0.0015BTC per constructive post
Sr. member : 0.0013BTC per constructive post
Full member : 0.0009BTC per constructive post
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
The logic is that:
1. As the position of a member goes up, the restrictions on what is allowed in the signature go down. So higher rank = usually better looking signatures.
2. Trust, popularity, activity on the forum generally rises with position. (You wouldn't trust me if I was a newbie
)3. Was and is standard practice, difficult to change.
Well, I did my attempt at Avatar campaign. Working fine (as of now at least).
If we do that with signature campaign, I would expect a similar thread from a Hero member, asking why it is NOT so...
Some campaigns pay more to "legendary" than "hero". This always seemed weird to me because you don't actually get a bigger space or any other extras with your signature when you get to "legendary". Also, I always found that bitmixer.io thing very strange---that they pay all ranks equally. That's why I jused to always just use the smallest signature when I advertized for them. They paid me the same but I got to take up less space on the forum for the same amount of payoff. In my opinion, everyone using bitmixer should probably be using the full member version unless they change this.
Why are the payouts in sig. campaigns based on the user's rank?
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
Different rank has different restrictions. Lower rank has more restriction and high ranks can use better signature with more colors and characters.Code:
Rates:
Hero member : 0.0015BTC per constructive post
Sr. member : 0.0013BTC per constructive post
Full member : 0.0009BTC per constructive post
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
If every user were paid the same poeple would create new accounts, make few posts and join signature campaigns and start filling the forum with worthless posts.
Is this the only difference which results in such a huge difference b/w the payouts?
Shouldn't this difference be more justified?
Dude a newbie has no color nor link, how do you expect him to get paid the same as a hero member, besides higher ranks are better publicity for your site, right? Is rather have 10 legendary members wearing my signature than 50 newbies
A full member's signature is equally attractive as that of a hero member.
Did you read the next part of what i said? Higher rank members give better publicity to a site than a newbie, member or even full members, so we have, better signature with less limits, higher rank means better rep and also as another user pointed out, higher rank would probably have more posts and when you change your sig it changes to all your posts, thats 3 things to take in count, i think its enough to get paid more
Another thread about forum signature, however I agree with philipma1957:
As a legendary member my self interest is pay me the most.
But in the dollar and cents reasoning I get paid more for one reason I have 9000+ posts.
If you pay me your add goes on all my old posts and all my new posts. So you are buying 9000+ adds.
If you pay a newbie he has under 100 posts. Plain and simple 9000 vs 100. this is why the fees are stacked.
Why are the payouts in sig. campaigns based on the user's rank?
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
Code:
Rates:
Hero member : 0.0015BTC per constructive post
Sr. member : 0.0013BTC per constructive post
Full member : 0.0009BTC per constructive post
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
As a legendary member my self interest is pay me the most.
But in the dollar and cents reasoning I get paid more for one reason I have 9000+ posts.
If you pay me your add goes on all my old posts and all my new posts. So you are buying 9000+ adds.
If you pay a newbie he has under 100 posts. Plain and simple 9000 vs 100. this is why the fees are stacked.
Maybe some day, signature campaign will pay higher rates for high quality poster even he/ she still newbie. I think it does still possible, right? They are being paid higher for helping and contribute to the forum
Why are the payouts in sig. campaigns based on the user's rank?
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
Different rank has different restrictions. Lower rank has more restriction and high ranks can use better signature with more colors and characters.Code:
Rates:
Hero member : 0.0015BTC per constructive post
Sr. member : 0.0013BTC per constructive post
Full member : 0.0009BTC per constructive post
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
If every user were paid the same poeple would create new accounts, make few posts and join signature campaigns and start filling the forum with worthless posts.
Is this the only difference which results in such a huge difference b/w the payouts?
Shouldn't this difference be more justified?
Dude a newbie has no color nor link, how do you expect him to get paid the same as a hero member, besides higher ranks are better publicity for your site, right? Is rather have 10 legendary members wearing my signature than 50 newbies
A full member's signature is equally attractive as that of a hero member.
For example, see Bitmixer's signatures, Full Member's signature is not equally attractive as Hero/Senior Member's.
Ironically they pay everybody same amount of Bitcoins.
Full member sig. looks more attractive to me than that of Sr. Member.(I cant find any hero member with bitcmixer sig.)
You can see a Hero member here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/karartma1-223006
Why are the payouts in sig. campaigns based on the user's rank?
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
Code:
Rates:
Hero member : 0.0015BTC per constructive post
Sr. member : 0.0013BTC per constructive post
Full member : 0.0009BTC per constructive post
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
As a legendary member my self interest is pay me the most.
But in the dollar and cents reasoning I get paid more for one reason I have 9000+ posts.
If you pay me your add goes on all my old posts and all my new posts. So you are buying 9000+ adds.
If you pay a newbie he has under 100 posts. Plain and simple 9000 vs 100. this is why the fees are stacked.
For example, see Bitmixer's signatures, Full Member's signature is not equally attractive as Hero/Senior Member's.
Are you talking about this campaign?https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/up-to-0035-btc-weekly-for-your-signature-new-rules-425135
Full member sig. looks more attractive to me than that of Sr. Member.(I cant find any hero member with bitcmixer sig.)
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 509
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
For example, see Bitmixer's signatures, Full Member's signature is not equally attractive as Hero/Senior Member's.
Why are the payouts in sig. campaigns based on the user's rank?
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
Different rank has different restrictions. Lower rank has more restriction and high ranks can use better signature with more colors and characters.Code:
Rates:
Hero member : 0.0015BTC per constructive post
Sr. member : 0.0013BTC per constructive post
Full member : 0.0009BTC per constructive post
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
If every user were paid the same poeple would create new accounts, make few posts and join signature campaigns and start filling the forum with worthless posts.
Is this the only difference which results in such a huge difference b/w the payouts?
Shouldn't this difference be more justified?
Dude a newbie has no color nor link, how do you expect him to get paid the same as a hero member, besides higher ranks are better publicity for your site, right? Is rather have 10 legendary members wearing my signature than 50 newbies
A full member's signature is equally attractive as that of a hero member.
Why are the payouts in sig. campaigns based on the user's rank?
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
Different rank has different restrictions. Lower rank has more restriction and high ranks can use better signature with more colors and characters.Code:
Rates:
Hero member : 0.0015BTC per constructive post
Sr. member : 0.0013BTC per constructive post
Full member : 0.0009BTC per constructive post
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
If every user were paid the same poeple would create new accounts, make few posts and join signature campaigns and start filling the forum with worthless posts.
Is this the only difference which results in such a huge difference b/w the payouts?
Shouldn't this difference be more justified?
Dude a newbie has no color nor link, how do you expect him to get paid the same as a hero member, besides higher ranks are better publicity for your site, right? Is rather have 10 legendary members wearing my signature than 50 newbies
Why are the payouts in sig. campaigns based on the user's rank?
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
Different rank has different restrictions. Lower rank has more restriction and high ranks can use better signature with more colors and characters.Code:
Rates:
Hero member : 0.0015BTC per constructive post
Sr. member : 0.0013BTC per constructive post
Full member : 0.0009BTC per constructive post
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
If every user were paid the same poeple would create new accounts, make few posts and join signature campaigns and start filling the forum with worthless posts.
Is this the only difference which results in such a huge difference b/w the payouts?
Shouldn't this difference be more justified?
Just look at the difference between the signatures of different ranks. You will understand why. You can barely notice a newbie signature.
Why are the payouts in sig. campaigns based on the user's rank?
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
Different rank has different restrictions. Lower rank has more restriction and high ranks can use better signature with more colors and characters.Code:
Rates:
Hero member : 0.0015BTC per constructive post
Sr. member : 0.0013BTC per constructive post
Full member : 0.0009BTC per constructive post
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
If every user were paid the same poeple would create new accounts, make few posts and join signature campaigns and start filling the forum with worthless posts.
Is this the only difference which results in such a huge difference b/w the payouts?
Shouldn't this difference be more justified?
Why are the payouts in sig. campaigns based on the user's rank?
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
Different rank has different restrictions. Lower rank has more restriction and high ranks can use better signature with more colors and characters.Code:
Rates:
Hero member : 0.0015BTC per constructive post
Sr. member : 0.0013BTC per constructive post
Full member : 0.0009BTC per constructive post
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
If every user were paid the same poeple would create new accounts, make few posts and join signature campaigns and start filling the forum with worthless posts.
Why are the payouts in sig. campaigns based on the user's rank?
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
Code:
Rates:
Hero member : 0.0015BTC per constructive post
Sr. member : 0.0013BTC per constructive post
Full member : 0.0009BTC per constructive post
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
No, they can't be equal because of signature restrictions.
- Newbie: No styling (including links) allowed. Max 50 characters.
- Jr. Member: Links allowed. Max 150 characters.
- Member: Unlimited length.
- Full: Color allowed.
- Sr. Member: Size allowed
- Hero: Background color allowed
- Jr. Member: Links allowed. Max 150 characters.
- Member: Unlimited length.
- Full: Color allowed.
- Sr. Member: Size allowed
- Hero: Background color allowed
Why are the payouts in sig. campaigns based on the user's rank?
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
Code:
Rates:
Hero member : 0.0015BTC per constructive post
Sr. member : 0.0013BTC per constructive post
Full member : 0.0009BTC per constructive post
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
Because different ranks allow different signatures. By your logic a Newbie that cant even have a link in their signature should get paid the same as you. That does not seem fair to me.
Why are the payouts in sig. campaigns based on the user's rank?
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
Code:
Rates:
Hero member : 0.0015BTC per constructive post
Sr. member : 0.0013BTC per constructive post
Full member : 0.0009BTC per constructive post
I think it should be equal for all the user's. Whats your opinion?
Jump to: