Because people outside of the mainstream are forced to adapt with little resources which means they have to compensate by being skilled and efficient.
Thats an interesting take on it and i think correct to a certain extent. thanks man.
So the main stream is undynamic? for some reason
The mainstream gets the majority bulk of resources pumped into it from humanity yet when you need high standards in whatever area of life you rarely get it from the mainstream, how would you explain why this is?
Haha that video was excellently delivered will be using that to link people in future thanks!.
I do hate to think its all one big conspiracy, the reason being is the herd still gets life improvements as we evolve? if the rich elite had their way we'd all be slaves with zero freedom? I'm looking for other contributing factors as to why the main stream system doesn't provide the best.
George Carlin is right. But he isn't complete. He left out the answers of what to do... at least in a direct manner. In fact, the fact that he could be on stage as popular as he became was that he used the main stream system to be the way he was, the exact system he was speaking against.
The people in the crowd laughed. They enjoyed Carlin's ironic humor. The were sort of like the people of Dresden, Germany, just before the bombing of Dresden in WWII. These people engaged in the attitude of, "Eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we may die." And on the morrow they did die.
Basically, in America, Britain, Canada, Australia, and other of the free countries, the reason standards are going lower is that people are looking to government for the answers to their questions and problems, rather than looking to themselves. When something goes wrong, the people take it to the government court rather than bringing their own court in the same courthouse building. Here's what I mean.
The courts are for everyone to use to make their case. The black robed ones aren't the only ones who have the authority. In a direct way, the 9th Amendment (and to a lesser extent the Preamble of the Constitution) allows anyone making a claim to not only bring his a claim, but to also bring in the rules of court. And his rules can state that the black robe can only referee the court, or the claimant will hold him in contempt.
Done correctly, the above works. But people can't do it correctly, because they think the judge is their king's direct representative. Who is their king? Obama, or whatever president is in power at the moment.
The truth of the matter is that all adult people are kings and queens. And until the people realize this and stand up as kings and queens, they are going to be treated as they designate themselves... as paupers. Claims in court - not complaints - are kings/queens disputing with other kings/queens, or with corporations which are the true paupers.
Here's one of the best videos that shows the way to do it - to stand up. You need to be a real MAN (or WOMAN). You need to KNOW that you are the one in authority YOUR court. Listen for the little place in the video where Karl reminds the judge that it is HIS (Karl's) court as he is the one bringing it - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Twn96nj0jfw&index=10&list=PLHrkQxgz0mg6kUBciD-HIvTXByqjcIZ-D. The people don't do this because they are too afraid to stand up as this video shows - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gc11mJGre10.
Again, the answer is simple in its bottom line form. The answer is that the people are kings and queens in this land. But if the kings and queens look to government rather than standing up as kings and queens, they will be treated as they ask to be treated.
I believe that for sure, we fund the public sector it is our service. I read twice and Im thinking through your points and vids ty:)
). 