Topic: Why are there no SHA-256 coins more profitable for mining than Bitcoin (Read 1138 times)
a good option is to mine at a profit switching multipool like noirpool.com that pays out in a strong currency like NoirShares
April 16, 2014, 12:21:27 PM
That all makes sense
April 16, 2014, 12:20:44 PM
as soon as any sha256 coin becomes more profitable than BTC, its gets `pound me in the ass prison gang raped` by ASIC terrahashers. At least that is my theory.
^^
I wish I could mine something more profitable than BTC, but we are all checking coinwarz
April 16, 2014, 11:49:41 AM
as soon as any sha256 coin becomes more profitable than BTC, its gets `pound me in the ass prison gang raped` by ASIC terrahashers. At least that is my theory.
April 16, 2014, 11:44:44 AM
Scrypt Alts are more profitable than Litecoin so why aren't SHA-256 alts more profitable to mine than Bitcoin? All the ones I see are actually worse.
A couple reasons I would think. For one Scrypt coins are held up by the cost of mining since miners wont sell at a loss (or shouldn't). GPU mining is more expensive so the cost of Scrypt coins is higher. At least that would be my guess.
April 16, 2014, 11:09:59 AM
Scrypt Alts are more profitable than Litecoin so why aren't SHA-256 alts more profitable to mine than Bitcoin? All the ones I see are actually worse.
Jump to: