I really wanted to quote and make emphasis on this part ***Trump or any other President is not really President. Rather, he is acting the part of President according to rules (law) laid down for a man to act the part.*** But, I don't know how so, I guess this would do.
The point remains that, they seem to be the above the law and are actually not and the fact that while in office, all their wrong decisions would be directed to the office and not the person makes it almost impossible to sue an acting president. Other than that, they are very much bounded by the law as the rest of us.
Topic: Why are they above the Law ? (Read 144 times)
^^^ Trump called the national guard in to block Antifa and BLM rioters who were sent by Biden... the only rioters that were there. After all, Trump had to protect his innocent, peace-loving MAGA people from the rioters.
Here's why they appear to be above the law >>> They haven't been accused of wrongdoing according to law that is effective for adjudicating them guilty.
Nobody has accused them of wrongdoing by the ways that can get them, and they are careful to not place themselves into a position where they do any of the wrong.
Sure, we can all see that they talk a bunch of bad things, but if they don't threaten anybody directly... freedom of speech without litigation for it. This is the way it is for all of us. How many times have we said things to friends, or at the bar, or at church, or at political meetings, or in small outings, that were negative about somebody, maybe a public figure? Yet we weren't prosecuted, because of freedom of speech, and because we could not be connected to doing anything wrong or bad ot illegal against anybody.
Same with those jokers in government. Everything they do is legal in ways that we can't hold them liable for. But if they are acting illegally against any one of us, why are we not taking them to court on it? The way to take them to court is according to the law.
Nobody has accused them of wrongdoing by the ways that can get them, and they are careful to not place themselves into a position where they do any of the wrong.
Sure, we can all see that they talk a bunch of bad things, but if they don't threaten anybody directly... freedom of speech without litigation for it. This is the way it is for all of us. How many times have we said things to friends, or at the bar, or at church, or at political meetings, or in small outings, that were negative about somebody, maybe a public figure? Yet we weren't prosecuted, because of freedom of speech, and because we could not be connected to doing anything wrong or bad ot illegal against anybody.
Same with those jokers in government. Everything they do is legal in ways that we can't hold them liable for. But if they are acting illegally against any one of us, why are we not taking them to court on it? The way to take them to court is according to the law.
and there we have it
first badecker admits other presidents are smarter then trump
but then badecker admits if a president is caught where his words cause a negative action. then they should be impeached.
and so whenjust hours before something bad happened. trump was saying things that would cause it to happen.
other presidents say things but hours later things dont occur. so no crime.
take trumps 'liberate your state' last year. and hours later riots occured and national guard had to be called in. a clear sign of trump ordering the riot because the riot happened in his name due to him asking his supporters to do it.
take trumps 'stop the steal' 'fight' 'we are strong' 'lets descend onto capital hill' then hours later the capital hill chaos. again direct link.
so thank you badecker you have just said you want trump impeached
Here's why they appear to be above the law >>> They haven't been accused of wrongdoing according to law that is effective for adjudicating them guilty.
Nobody has accused them of wrongdoing by the ways that can get them, and they are careful to not place themselves into a position where they do any of the wrong.
Sure, we can all see that they talk a bunch of bad things, but if they don't threaten anybody directly... freedom of speech without litigation for it. This is the way it is for all of us. How many times have we said things to friends, or at the bar, or at church, or at political meetings, or in small outings, that were negative about somebody, maybe a public figure? Yet we weren't prosecuted, because of freedom of speech, and because we could not be connected to doing anything wrong or bad ot illegal against anybody.
Same with those jokers in government. Everything they do is legal in ways that we can't hold them liable for. But if they are acting illegally against any one of us, why are we not taking them to court on it? The way to take them to court is according to the law.
One of the major things we need to recognize is the difference between the human being and the office he/she holds.
Think of this. Any politician is a man or woman. They all have sleeping periods, and waking times of the day. They all eat food and drink water. They all take showers and use the restroom. They are the same as we are regarding their status in life as a man or woman.
They are different than us in their status in life as a person. After all, artificial entities like corporations are considered to be persons under the law. A President is a double entity. He is a man, and he is a person called the President.
Look at a movie star. Consider Jim Carey playing Truman Burbank in The Truman Show. Was Jim Carey really Truman Burbank? Or was he simply acting a part in a movie?
Trump or any other President is not really President. Rather, he is acting the part of President according to rules (law) laid down for a man to act the part.
If the man who is holding the office of the President doesn't make a move, does the President do anything at all? That is, can the Office of the President do something without the man acting? Doesn't the man have to act before the President can act?
If the man moves the Presidency to do something illegal, the only way that you can go after the President is through the legally prescribed methods. But since the man had to act to get the President to act, the man also did the illegal thing. If you don't know the legal process for going after the President for wrongdoing, go after the man. Because under the Constitution, every man/woman is the same as every other man woman as far as wrongdoing against each other, even though the citizen-person may be completely different regard his relationship to the Presidency.
As long as the courts can keep you from identifying the wrong the man (President) did against you, and...
... as long as they can keep you from accusing the man in a man-to-man court...
... the President can get away with all kinds of crap. And it's the same for Senators and Congress people. All of the legal attacks against any of them don't have anything to do with the man/woman - at least in the first instance - but rather, they have to do with the Office they are holding.
If Pelosi or anybody in Government does something that harms you or damages your property, identify the harm or damage, and sue the man/woman in court for using their office to harm you. Don't sue their office they held.
You have been tricked over the years to not sue people man to man, you your human self. You have been tricked into becoming the client of an attorney to let the attorney fight for you. Don't do this. Don't even represent yourself in court. Rather, stand present, so that the other man/woman has to stand present, so that you can get around their office, and accuse them of their wrongdoing that they used their office to do against you.
Much of the info about how to do this, and what is really going on, can be found here https://www.youtube.com/c/CraigLynch/videos. Find practical use that is going on right now here https://awarriorcalls.com/a-warrior-calls-landing-page/.
Nobody has accused them of wrongdoing by the ways that can get them, and they are careful to not place themselves into a position where they do any of the wrong.
Sure, we can all see that they talk a bunch of bad things, but if they don't threaten anybody directly... freedom of speech without litigation for it. This is the way it is for all of us. How many times have we said things to friends, or at the bar, or at church, or at political meetings, or in small outings, that were negative about somebody, maybe a public figure? Yet we weren't prosecuted, because of freedom of speech, and because we could not be connected to doing anything wrong or bad ot illegal against anybody.
Same with those jokers in government. Everything they do is legal in ways that we can't hold them liable for. But if they are acting illegally against any one of us, why are we not taking them to court on it? The way to take them to court is according to the law.
One of the major things we need to recognize is the difference between the human being and the office he/she holds.
Think of this. Any politician is a man or woman. They all have sleeping periods, and waking times of the day. They all eat food and drink water. They all take showers and use the restroom. They are the same as we are regarding their status in life as a man or woman.
They are different than us in their status in life as a person. After all, artificial entities like corporations are considered to be persons under the law. A President is a double entity. He is a man, and he is a person called the President.
Look at a movie star. Consider Jim Carey playing Truman Burbank in The Truman Show. Was Jim Carey really Truman Burbank? Or was he simply acting a part in a movie?
Trump or any other President is not really President. Rather, he is acting the part of President according to rules (law) laid down for a man to act the part.
If the man who is holding the office of the President doesn't make a move, does the President do anything at all? That is, can the Office of the President do something without the man acting? Doesn't the man have to act before the President can act?
If the man moves the Presidency to do something illegal, the only way that you can go after the President is through the legally prescribed methods. But since the man had to act to get the President to act, the man also did the illegal thing. If you don't know the legal process for going after the President for wrongdoing, go after the man. Because under the Constitution, every man/woman is the same as every other man woman as far as wrongdoing against each other, even though the citizen-person may be completely different regard his relationship to the Presidency.
As long as the courts can keep you from identifying the wrong the man (President) did against you, and...
... as long as they can keep you from accusing the man in a man-to-man court...
... the President can get away with all kinds of crap. And it's the same for Senators and Congress people. All of the legal attacks against any of them don't have anything to do with the man/woman - at least in the first instance - but rather, they have to do with the Office they are holding.
If Pelosi or anybody in Government does something that harms you or damages your property, identify the harm or damage, and sue the man/woman in court for using their office to harm you. Don't sue their office they held.
You have been tricked over the years to not sue people man to man, you your human self. You have been tricked into becoming the client of an attorney to let the attorney fight for you. Don't do this. Don't even represent yourself in court. Rather, stand present, so that the other man/woman has to stand present, so that you can get around their office, and accuse them of their wrongdoing that they used their office to do against you.
Much of the info about how to do this, and what is really going on, can be found here https://www.youtube.com/c/CraigLynch/videos. Find practical use that is going on right now here https://awarriorcalls.com/a-warrior-calls-landing-page/.
Jump to: