I am just curious: Why do we need institutional money coming in to Bitcoin as if it is the one that can rescue Bitcoin from going down? Is this not an obvious sign that as a supposedly P2P currency Bitcoin is failing on this aspect?
Bitcoin is supposed to be in the hands of the people and not with institutions, or so that is the impression I got by reading some articles about Bitcoin and it should be taking the many traditional institutions by storm, right? Now, I am seeing that it is the other way around.
Please correct me if my impressions is really wrong. Or maybe I miss something here. But please don't insult my ignorance...
We need institutional money to come in because we want the price to rise. In case you haven't noticed, Bitcoin has become more of an investment, of a speculative asset, of bears and bulls, and not really about as a currency, of where to spend them as real money.
Institutional money flowing in does not mean a growing adoption of Bitcoin as a currency. It represents the growing demand of Bitcoin as an asset. Is it good? Yes and no depending on how much weight we assign to Bitcoin as a currency or as an asset.
Although I'd be very happy if institutional players would come in and buy Bitcoins in bulk, I'd be a lot happier if ordinary people will buy Bitcoin even in small amounts and spend them.