Let's see, I have 1, 2, 3, 4 people who left negative feedback for my transaction with squall from a year ago. Yet, for some reason, squall has not left any negative trust.
Why is it these people that never did business with me feel the need to negate my reputation on this forum while the guy who lost the money hasn't even done so himself?
Why do people feel they have to speak for squall? It would be more appropriate if squall was the only one to leave negative feedback for this transaction, but this is not the case.
You just mention that you scam squall, thats enough to get you some negative trust...
Are you serious? Since when is failing to pay somebody because of other financial downfalls in your life scamming someone?
A scammer is someone who has the set intentions of stealing money for personal gain. What the hell kind of scammer wins 75 BTC, pays back 22 BTC and starts paying the rest off the next year?
It's pretty clear that I am not a scammer or I would have dipped a long time ago.
You all are the ones who are hurt from this in the end. My message of unconditional love, the concept that will flip the world upside down, would more easily be accepted and absorbed into the community if I didn't have a scammer tag misrepresenting me causing humans to instinctively judge before they see the whole picture.
Perhaps I should move along and let you guys teach yourself.
I was also there when Squall lent you the coins, and when you defaulted.