So seems likely that both ought to be headed for the trash heap as investors seek out coins that are actually sincere about wanting to provide security thus avoid fragmenting the hash type's miner-base between coins, instead having all the coins merged so as to all benefit from each other's miner-base...
-MarkM-
Fragmenting? SRC has a majority of the hash rate due to fair compensation for miners.
QRK's miner base is so weak that it would not contribute much to SRC security, if anything.
In other words you don't care about end users, screw them all if by doing so you can profit by making the coins they use unstable by sucking away the miners.
"Lets de-stabilise this hash-type so we can profit by pretending the people will be better off coming over to us."
Sound like, like DOGE did to Litecoin, your main contribution really is just to show that the hash type involved is acctually not secure because some new garbage can suck away the miners.
DOGE showed that litecoin was - and likely still is - so pathetically insecure that some stupid meme could whip up more hashing power than it had almost overnight.
II haven't seen a meme from you yet so I guess you are demonstrating that whatever hash type you guys use is so even more pathetically insecure than Litecoin that more hashing power than it had can be whipped up almost overnight without even using a meme!
For a while Litecoin and DOGE were like you guys, fuck the end uers, lets split up the miner base by refusing to merged mine.
Eventually though DOGE did implement merged mining so at last the litecoin miner-base can secure all the scrypt coins other than those that, like you apparently, do not actually give a damn about end users and still want to try to weaken the scrypt family in general by trying to fragment the scrypt miner-base...
With luck maybe some meme will hit soon, saying lets destroy all the non merged scrypt coins, instead of, like DOGE did, saying lets make yet another crapcoin to try to fragment the miner-base making all coins that use this algorithm that much less secure...
Litecoin was lucky the meme that hit them was just a make another crapcoin meme not a lets attack litecoin's chain and doublespend it meme...
-MarkM-
1. Communism failed. Competition is the source of innovation.
2. Why would anyone want to support the QRK pyramid scheme by giving it more power? They wouldn't. The QRK devs only cared about their own profits and their network is paying for it now.
3. Your example of Litecoin is irrelevant. Litecoin was not a pyramid scheme and thus working together with other non ponzi coins makes sense. Litecoin will also contribute back to them. QRK has nothing to offer SRC now or ever.