Author

Topic: Why coins go into maintenance with the master of chains Mullick from Cryptsy (Read 375 times)

legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1010
Join The Blockchain Revolution In Logistics
Cryptsy needs to install their own system of block explorers with 'peer' addnode feature.

This will help with the vitality of the shiite coins.

They can do it on their website or dedicate another web property to do it.  It is a simple solution.

That said, there are also some super shitte coins listed, dev abandoned right from the start and have been locked up since the start.  Cuz the code is crap.  For those they need to think of a process of porting them onto Crypto 2.0 platforms.

Last, yeah set some standards on new coin additions from here on out.  No more BobSurplus CIRC, 007, or other ninja mine flash in the pans.
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1001
I asked mullick from cryptsy why chains go into maintenance so much on cryptsy this is what he said.

http://www.ttm.news/2015/10/15/why-coins-go-into-maintenance-with-the-master-of-chains-mullick-from-cryptsy/

That actually makes sense. The best answer I could see would be for Cryptsy to be more selective with the coins they list. At a quick glance, 80% of the coins traded on cryptsy don't move 1BTC worth of volume in 24 hours. This adds cost to Cryptsy to maintain, which is only offset by coin devs (preminers) bribing Cryptsy with payments to get their (shit)coin listed.

It's not a sustainable business practice and it means that most of us that aren't interested in shitcoins will just go elsewhere. Cryptsy - look for innovation and be selective. Don't try to be the fucking walmart of altcoin trading.
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1014
Franko is Freedom
I asked mullick from cryptsy why chains go into maintenance so much on cryptsy this is what he said.

http://www.ttm.news/2015/10/15/why-coins-go-into-maintenance-with-the-master-of-chains-mullick-from-cryptsy/
Jump to: