Author

Topic: Why did flexcoin fail? (Read 593 times)

hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
0xFB0D8D1534241423
June 20, 2013, 03:19:23 PM
#4
High fees
Cannot generate multiple addresses
Cannot access privkeys
No API access
Not trustworthy for large amounts
Have to pay extra for security

Etc, etc

The interest is BS and so are the fees. But do you agree that the custom names and fre FC to FC transactions are useful?
Certainly. However, for fc-fc payments to be useful, most people need to use fc. Network effect, bootstrapping problem, etc etc.

Custom names are prone to squatting.
sr. member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 254
June 20, 2013, 03:12:28 PM
#3
High fees
Cannot generate multiple addresses
Cannot access privkeys
No API access
Not trustworthy for large amounts
Have to pay extra for security

Etc, etc

The interest is BS and so are the fees. But do you agree that the custom names and fre FC to FC transactions are useful?
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
0xFB0D8D1534241423
June 20, 2013, 03:10:20 PM
#2
High fees
Cannot generate multiple addresses
Cannot access privkeys
No API access
Not trustworthy for large amounts
Have to pay extra for security

Etc, etc
sr. member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 254
June 20, 2013, 03:04:22 PM
#1
Why does flexcoin suck? it was a great idea. how come it didnt catch on?
Jump to: