Topic: Why do bounties have strange stake numbers for each sub-category? (Read 117 times)
Yeah a nice standardized template would be good.
February 11, 2018, 07:16:36 AM
A typical bounty program goes like this: 2% of total tokens goes to bounty.
From this 2%, it is divided as follows:
- 30% sig campaign
- 20% article campaign
- 15% translation campaign
- 10% facebook campaign
- 10% twitter campaign
- 15% Medium campaign
And then stakes -
Translation campaign - Bounty Thread: 100 stakes.. Whitepaper: 500 stakes
Article campaign - Good quality: 30 stakes, medium quality: 10 stakes.. poor quality.. 0 stakes
That is enough of an example to form my question.
My question here now is this: Since 15% of this 2% is reserved for the translation campaign anyway, what is the point of the high stake numbers? It may as well be -
Translation campaign - Bounty Thread: 1 stake.. Whitepaper: 5 stakes.
Article campaign - Good quality: 3 stakes.. medium quality: 1 stake.. poor quality.. 0 stakes
Why the 100* and 10* multiplier and things like that? What is the point of it since these sub-categories are already restricted from the token allocation of other categories anyway?
From this 2%, it is divided as follows:
- 30% sig campaign
- 20% article campaign
- 15% translation campaign
- 10% facebook campaign
- 10% twitter campaign
- 15% Medium campaign
And then stakes -
Translation campaign - Bounty Thread: 100 stakes.. Whitepaper: 500 stakes
Article campaign - Good quality: 30 stakes, medium quality: 10 stakes.. poor quality.. 0 stakes
That is enough of an example to form my question.
My question here now is this: Since 15% of this 2% is reserved for the translation campaign anyway, what is the point of the high stake numbers? It may as well be -
Translation campaign - Bounty Thread: 1 stake.. Whitepaper: 5 stakes.
Article campaign - Good quality: 3 stakes.. medium quality: 1 stake.. poor quality.. 0 stakes
Why the 100* and 10* multiplier and things like that? What is the point of it since these sub-categories are already restricted from the token allocation of other categories anyway?
potato, potatoe....
if it does work, why change it
Actually... make up a system for bitcointalk users to follow, maybe it will accomodate to whole forum?
try it, why not
February 11, 2018, 06:37:08 AM
A typical bounty program goes like this: 2% of total tokens goes to bounty.
From this 2%, it is divided as follows:
- 30% sig campaign
- 20% article campaign
- 15% translation campaign
- 10% facebook campaign
- 10% twitter campaign
- 15% Medium campaign
And then stakes -
Translation campaign - Bounty Thread: 100 stakes.. Whitepaper: 500 stakes
Article campaign - Good quality: 30 stakes, medium quality: 10 stakes.. poor quality.. 0 stakes
That is enough of an example to form my question.
My question here now is this: Since 15% of this 2% is reserved for the translation campaign anyway, what is the point of the high stake numbers? It may as well be -
Translation campaign - Bounty Thread: 1 stake.. Whitepaper: 5 stakes.
Article campaign - Good quality: 3 stakes.. medium quality: 1 stake.. poor quality.. 0 stakes
Why the 100* and 10* multiplier and things like that? What is the point of it since these sub-categories are already restricted from the token allocation of other categories anyway?
From this 2%, it is divided as follows:
- 30% sig campaign
- 20% article campaign
- 15% translation campaign
- 10% facebook campaign
- 10% twitter campaign
- 15% Medium campaign
And then stakes -
Translation campaign - Bounty Thread: 100 stakes.. Whitepaper: 500 stakes
Article campaign - Good quality: 30 stakes, medium quality: 10 stakes.. poor quality.. 0 stakes
That is enough of an example to form my question.
My question here now is this: Since 15% of this 2% is reserved for the translation campaign anyway, what is the point of the high stake numbers? It may as well be -
Translation campaign - Bounty Thread: 1 stake.. Whitepaper: 5 stakes.
Article campaign - Good quality: 3 stakes.. medium quality: 1 stake.. poor quality.. 0 stakes
Why the 100* and 10* multiplier and things like that? What is the point of it since these sub-categories are already restricted from the token allocation of other categories anyway?
Jump to: