and guess that the second round will be even more successful than the first one.
Today crypto currency is as was Far West in 1700s, just full of Indians, forrests, mountains, no roads
and EXTREMELY dangerous and hostile place to move, live and invest in, but today you have highways,
you have mega cities and tenth of millions of people living there without any danger.
Welcome to the 17th century of new finance LOL .
I kind of agree and like your analogy, although the wild West wasn't as bad as people make out. By the 1800s (and only fairly recently through an Internet meme, you know you can always trust those! did I find this out) the murder rate in the US was similar to that of Britain (then it diverged upward after circa 1900, whereas in the UK it fell to about 0,6/100k in 1955 before slowly climbing back up).
And life is never completely free from danger, whether it be from criminality, unfortunate accident, illness or whatever. The only certainty is death (if you're sneaky/brave/foolish you can evade taxes ).
I think most of the profitability (+EV) of bitcoin investment arises because the perceived risk, of which the RoI is a representation, is far greater than the real risk, much as the latter is wholly extant.
Sorry for my bad english
If English isn't your first language, your English isn't bad. It's good. I can handle German, French, Swedish, Dutch and Luxembourgish and maybe even Welsh to varying degrees, but I don't think I'm as good at any of those as your English is (maybe I'm not too bad at German ).