Author

Topic: Why do some pools get pinned and others don't? (Read 1278 times)

administrator
Activity: 5222
Merit: 13032
Unstickied and sorted.

I don't think it was necessary a bad idea. He did it before I created the subcategories. Having all the major options stickied seems helpful to me. (I don't read the mining section, though.)
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
side note: I don't like how moderators just pinned a shitload of topics. It's completely useless, and it clutters up the forum.

Heres an idea, maybe the miners should be in the "Mining software (miners)" subforum?

Nah, makes too much sense.
sr. member
Activity: 304
Merit: 250
Do your part for Bitcoin!
This topic needs to be moved to Meta.
legendary
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1452
side note: I don't like how moderators just pinned a shitload of topics. It's completely useless, and it clutters up the forum.
sr. member
Activity: 258
Merit: 250
Can we get some word from the moderator about this? Doesn't seem to make competition thrive if the bitcoin.org forum is endorsing some pools, but not others by having only a select few gaining preferential treatment.

Biased much?
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
Radix-The Decentralized Finance Protocol
It makes no sense to me neither. The way it was before was better.
newbie
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
Apparently only the biggest/most notable pools get pinned.
sr. member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 264
bit.ly/3QXp3oh | Ultimate Launchpad on TON
Why do some pools get the pleasure of being pinned to the top of this thread and others don't?
Jump to: