Author

Topic: Why does the media continue to miss the obvious? (Read 265 times)

legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1000
Soon, I have to go away.
February 26, 2016, 07:24:57 PM
#2
They ignore it on purpose, dont want to panic the sheeple now.

I love facts like this thanks for the link, Nasa did report it according to RT News NASA report
vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
http://www.livescience.com/53816-large-ish-meteor-hits-earth-but-no-one-notices.html?li_source=LI&li_medium=more-from-livescience

Quote
Normally, atmospheric explosions are recorded by seismic monitors, microphones and/or satellite observations. As Plait pointed out, as the impact was in open ocean, it's not likely that seismic monitors would have been used to record the impact energy. As the military has pretty obvious reasons for monitoring atmospheric explosions, it seems likely the data came from a classified source, probably satellites.

The first thing that came to my mind were ocean tsunami buoys. If a large meteor were to hit the ocean, I immediately envision a tidal wave of some size to be picked up by at least one buoy. Yet, the media missed it, even if they were to pen an article on another page about said buoys unrelated to meteors, nobody on staff would've be wise enough to connect the two.
Jump to: