Do you know why? Personally I think it is something great! By the people for the people... how is delegation to a judge better? It adds a single point of failure...
Imagine the chance to be judged by a brain dead idiot like you luls.
Now understand why only the united states have it?
Haha
Canada, Australia, Britain, and India have it as well. People need to wake up and use it to put down the evil people in their governments.
I looked it up and what you said is wrong.
India has no trial by jury since 1973. The other states have trial by jury for special cases e.g. defamation (UK) or murder (canada) or have a court of lay assessors for minor offences (austria/germany).
The US american trial by jury is unique in the world.
For almost 8 years the potus didn t believed in American exceptionalism. He was brainwashed and dumbed down somewhere sometimes.
The popular jury is totally consistent with the general flow of the us consitution. People judge their peers according to their belief and situation while having the right to bear arms. The self independent free and responsible man. Take care of your destiny, pursue your quest for happiness while providing for yourself yourself.
Do you know why? Personally I think it is something great! By the people for the people... how is delegation to a judge better? It adds a single point of failure...
Imagine the chance to be judged by a brain dead idiot like you luls.
Now understand why only the united states have it?
Haha
What would be interesting to know is the rules on jury selection. And how it works in practice. Because I am sure some have devoted their life to exploit it...
There are two forms of jury selection in America. They could be called, statute selection, and common selection. Both rely on the position of the accuser.
The accuser in all statute trials is essentially the government or the courts. The accuser in common law trials is an average person.
Statue law accusers (plaintiffs) follow the judge's and the Rules of Court jury selection processes. Common law accusers can invoke rules other than the standard civil law Rules of Court.
One very important aspect of the term "common law" is that there are essentially two kinds of common law. There is common law that has been defined by the courts, and there is common law that existed before the courts existed... before the American Constitution... before the Articles of Confederation.
The reason for these two common law types is, people in government have been trying to break the people. They want a civil law government rather than a common law government. It all has to do with world domination. People have to fight in court to get a common law trial that is not a government defined common law trial, but rather a pre-government common law trial.
