the Russians did not poke its nose into world politics and the world was safer. Russia is the enemy of Western ideology.
the CIA soon supplied thousands of Korans
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Cyclone
Topic: Why is russia the only country (regime) supporting dprk at the un? (Read 1782 times)
the CIA soon supplied thousands of Korans
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Cyclone
May 04, 2017, 07:38:38 AM
The americans dont seem to learn from their mistakes and a fool who never learns is destined to repeat the same mistake over and over again. They started with Afghanistan against the Russians and they are still doing it, when you install a puppet regime they are bound to rebel at some point in time.
So they made it a tradition to repeat their mistakes, and not learn from them
LOL I call it cockiness and believing too much in yourself. the us needs to check itself thorougly this time and it needs to be a little more careful when dealing with russia
May 04, 2017, 07:25:22 AM
The americans dont seem to learn from their mistakes and a fool who never learns is destined to repeat the same mistake over and over again. They started with Afghanistan against the Russians and they are still doing it, when you install a puppet regime they are bound to rebel at some point in time.
So they made it a tradition to repeat their mistakes, and not learn from them
LOL I call it cockiness and believing too much in yourself. the us needs to check itself thorougly this time and it needs to be a little more careful when dealing with russia
May 02, 2017, 01:49:27 AM
The second a state came remotely close to actual secession they would be invaded and squelched by any means necessary.
Don't be so sure about it. If a large state such as Texas or California votes overwhelmingly to secede, do you really think that the remaining states will invade them? It is not practical and if it happens, then the entire nation will collapse.
May 01, 2017, 08:45:24 AM
The americans dont seem to learn from their mistakes and a fool who never learns is destined to repeat the same mistake over and over again. They started with Afghanistan against the Russians and they are still doing it, when you install a puppet regime they are bound to rebel at some point in time.
So they made it a tradition to repeat their mistakes, and not learn from them
May 01, 2017, 08:25:26 AM
The americans dont seem to learn from their mistakes and a fool who never learns is destined to repeat the same mistake over and over again. They started with Afghanistan against the Russians and they are still doing it, when you install a puppet regime they are bound to rebel at some point in time.
May 01, 2017, 01:49:19 AM
The United States of America is going to disintegrate very soon, as a result of warfare. Trump will start a war with the North Korea, and it will destroy the American economy. Another war with Iran will result in the US breaking up in to smaller nations. Once that happens, Putin can send his green men to Alaska.
lol, yeah right, the United States will be a 50 state union until the day you die.
The second a state came remotely close to actual secession they would be invaded and squelched by any means necessary.
April 30, 2017, 12:07:11 AM
Everyone knows that in Brighton most live Russian. Imagine if the Russians take over all police stations and hold a fake referendum on the accession Brighton beach to Russia. Think about it.
Why not?! Putin can secretly send "green men" here, equipped with portable small-range missiles with nuclear warheads. Most likely Trump will agree to give away Brighton district and to save whole US.The United States of America is going to disintegrate very soon, as a result of warfare. Trump will start a war with the North Korea, and it will destroy the American economy. Another war with Iran will result in the US breaking up in to smaller nations. Once that happens, Putin can send his green men to Alaska.
April 29, 2017, 11:09:20 PM
For the lols
April 29, 2017, 11:07:56 PM
Russians who live in Brighton
There is a Jew Gangs of Brighton Beach Territory.
Monya Elson, Boris Nayfeld
The Russian there is only the Language.
http://gangstersinc.ning.com/profiles/blogs/russian-mob-crew-in-brighton-beach-busted-by-dea-irs
People of Brighton "lived in Russia and know how bad this country is"
April 29, 2017, 10:28:18 PM
Everyone knows that in Brighton most live Russian. Imagine if the Russians take over all police stations and hold a fake referendum on the accession Brighton beach to Russia. Think about it.
Why not?! Putin can secretly send "green men" here, equipped with portable small-range missiles with nuclear warheads. Most likely Trump will agree to give away Brighton district and to save whole US.
April 29, 2017, 09:39:21 PM
Everyone knows that in Brighton most live Russian. Imagine if the Russians take over all police stations and hold a fake referendum on the accession Brighton beach to Russia. Think about it.
Why not?! Putin can secretly send "green men" here, equipped with portable small-range missiles with nuclear warheads. Most likely Trump will agree to give away Brighton district and to save whole US. 
April 29, 2017, 06:31:02 PM
And also, didn't Russia just ANNEXED Crimea?
Crimea was part of Russia from 1783 to 1954. In 1954, the ethnic Ukrainian Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea to Ukraine illegally, despite the peninsula having a solid ethnic Russian majority. As a result of ethnicide from the Ukrainians (such as ban on the usage of Russian language), the Crimeans voted to go back to Russia. There was no annexation.
I don't remember any voting to secede taking place. All I remember is there was a "coup" which installed a pro-EU president. Before anyone can say cheese, bam, you already have heavily-armed, pro-Russia "rebels" in Crimea. Then you have Russian forces in, taking control of the place.
Also, aren't Russians not the true natives there? I believe Empress Catherine expelled the Tatars when Russia first annexed Crimea.
And also, didn't Russia just ANNEXED Crimea?
Crimea was part of Russia from 1783 to 1954. In 1954, the ethnic Ukrainian Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea to Ukraine illegally, despite the peninsula having a solid ethnic Russian majority. As a result of ethnicide from the Ukrainians (such as ban on the usage of Russian language), the Crimeans voted to go back to Russia. There was no annexation.
Maybe because they're not ethnic Russians? Ethnic Russians in former Soviet states outside Russia are valuable because it gives Kremlin a "just" reason to interfere in their behalf.
Seems everyone have imperialistic dreams these days.
April 28, 2017, 09:32:49 AM
And also, didn't Russia just ANNEXED Crimea?
Crimea was part of Russia from 1783 to 1954. In 1954, the ethnic Ukrainian Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea to Ukraine illegally, despite the peninsula having a solid ethnic Russian majority. As a result of ethnicide from the Ukrainians (such as ban on the usage of Russian language), the Crimeans voted to go back to Russia. There was no annexation.
It is only the world government that can not recognize the annexation of the Crimea, because it is not profitable for them. Most of the population of Crimea and even some Ukrainians consider themselves Russians and speak Russian.
April 28, 2017, 08:56:16 AM
And also, didn't Russia just ANNEXED Crimea?
Crimea was part of Russia from 1783 to 1954. In 1954, the ethnic Ukrainian Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea to Ukraine illegally, despite the peninsula having a solid ethnic Russian majority. As a result of ethnicide from the Ukrainians (such as ban on the usage of Russian language), the Crimeans voted to go back to Russia. There was no annexation.
It is only the world government that can not recognize the annexation of the Crimea, because it is not profitable for them. Most of the population of Crimea and even some Ukrainians consider themselves Russians and speak Russian.
April 28, 2017, 01:41:43 AM
The world does not recognize the annexation of Crimea. Only Russians think so. Also peoples have the right to self-determination but only a part of the country on whose territory they reside. You forgot the reaction of Russia to self-determination of the Chechen Republic?
Before the disintegration of the USSR, around one-third of the population of Chechenya was Christian and white. These people lived in the districts of Shelkovskoy and Naursky. These two districts were actually Terek Cossack homeland, but gifted to Chechenya by the Soviets (just like they gifted Crimea to Ukraine). Also, the lowland Chechens were pro-Russia and they never supported the independence movement. Less than one-third of the Chechens wanted to secede from Russia. In Crimea, more than 90% of the population wanted to be part of Russia.
April 27, 2017, 05:32:44 PM
And also, didn't Russia just ANNEXED Crimea?
Crimea was part of Russia from 1783 to 1954. In 1954, the ethnic Ukrainian Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea to Ukraine illegally, despite the peninsula having a solid ethnic Russian majority. As a result of ethnicide from the Ukrainians (such as ban on the usage of Russian language), the Crimeans voted to go back to Russia. There was no annexation.
I don't remember any voting to secede taking place. All I remember is there was a "coup" which installed a pro-EU president. Before anyone can say cheese, bam, you already have heavily-armed, pro-Russia "rebels" in Crimea. Then you have Russian forces in, taking control of the place.
Also, aren't Russians not the true natives there? I believe Empress Catherine expelled the Tatars when Russia first annexed Crimea.
And also, didn't Russia just ANNEXED Crimea?
Crimea was part of Russia from 1783 to 1954. In 1954, the ethnic Ukrainian Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea to Ukraine illegally, despite the peninsula having a solid ethnic Russian majority. As a result of ethnicide from the Ukrainians (such as ban on the usage of Russian language), the Crimeans voted to go back to Russia. There was no annexation.
Maybe because they're not ethnic Russians? Ethnic Russians in former Soviet states outside Russia are valuable because it gives Kremlin a "just" reason to interfere in their behalf.
April 27, 2017, 05:15:05 PM
And also, didn't Russia just ANNEXED Crimea?
Crimea was part of Russia from 1783 to 1954. In 1954, the ethnic Ukrainian Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea to Ukraine illegally, despite the peninsula having a solid ethnic Russian majority. As a result of ethnicide from the Ukrainians (such as ban on the usage of Russian language), the Crimeans voted to go back to Russia. There was no annexation.
I don't remember any voting to secede taking place. All I remember is there was a "coup" which installed a pro-EU president. Before anyone can say cheese, bam, you already have heavily-armed, pro-Russia "rebels" in Crimea. Then you have Russian forces in, taking control of the place.
Also, aren't Russians not the true natives there? I believe Empress Catherine expelled the Tatars when Russia first annexed Crimea.
And also, didn't Russia just ANNEXED Crimea?
Crimea was part of Russia from 1783 to 1954. In 1954, the ethnic Ukrainian Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea to Ukraine illegally, despite the peninsula having a solid ethnic Russian majority. As a result of ethnicide from the Ukrainians (such as ban on the usage of Russian language), the Crimeans voted to go back to Russia. There was no annexation.
Maybe because they're not ethnic Russians? Ethnic Russians in former Soviet states outside Russia are valuable because it gives Kremlin a "just" reason to interfere in their behalf.
April 27, 2017, 03:29:33 PM
And also, didn't Russia just ANNEXED Crimea?
Crimea was part of Russia from 1783 to 1954. In 1954, the ethnic Ukrainian Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea to Ukraine illegally, despite the peninsula having a solid ethnic Russian majority. As a result of ethnicide from the Ukrainians (such as ban on the usage of Russian language), the Crimeans voted to go back to Russia. There was no annexation.
April 27, 2017, 12:03:17 AM
And also, didn't Russia just ANNEXED Crimea?
Crimea was part of Russia from 1783 to 1954. In 1954, the ethnic Ukrainian Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea to Ukraine illegally, despite the peninsula having a solid ethnic Russian majority. As a result of ethnicide from the Ukrainians (such as ban on the usage of Russian language), the Crimeans voted to go back to Russia. There was no annexation.
April 26, 2017, 11:58:15 AM
And today Russia has no American troops on its border? The Russians themselves are to blame. Not only do they attack their neighbors, but also constantly provoke the West. For this reason, it turns out everything is just the opposite.
Russia has American troops on its borders, especially in Finland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. But Russia has not invaded any of these nations. And regarding Ukraine, there was no Russian invasion. There is an ongoing civil war between the Westerners and the Easterners, and Russia is not directly involved.
April 26, 2017, 10:48:45 AM
And today Russia has no American troops on its border? The Russians themselves are to blame. Not only do they attack their neighbors, but also constantly provoke the West. For this reason, it turns out everything is just the opposite.
Russia has American troops on its borders, especially in Finland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. But Russia has not invaded any of these nations. And regarding Ukraine, there was no Russian invasion. There is an ongoing civil war between the Westerners and the Easterners, and Russia is not directly involved.
Might be the reason they're not invading? And also, didn't Russia just ANNEXED Crimea?
April 26, 2017, 10:14:17 AM
Russia wants to appear to be a world power, though I've no fucking idea why as it's a pointless and wasteful role.
To do that I suppose they decide to prop up the cheapest options out there with the most to gain from being given a hand job by them. And it annoys everyone else.
To do that I suppose they decide to prop up the cheapest options out there with the most to gain from being given a hand job by them. And it annoys everyone else.
Russia does not want to seem like a world power, and it is a strong world power led by a powerful ruler. And it really annoys everyone, but they can not do anything.
Russia is still a shadow of its former self. If you compare Russia as of now and the USSR of the early 1980s, then it is clear. The USSR had a population of close to 300 million, and their armed forces were as powerful as that of the United States. Now if you look at Russia, it is having a population of only around 145 million, and the armed forces are clearly inferior to that of the Americans. That said, their resurgence after 1999, when Putin took over has been nothing short of a miracle.
April 26, 2017, 08:21:30 AM
Russia wants to appear to be a world power, though I've no fucking idea why as it's a pointless and wasteful role.
To do that I suppose they decide to prop up the cheapest options out there with the most to gain from being given a hand job by them. And it annoys everyone else.
To do that I suppose they decide to prop up the cheapest options out there with the most to gain from being given a hand job by them. And it annoys everyone else.
Russia does not want to seem like a world power, and it is a strong world power led by a powerful ruler. And it really annoys everyone, but they can not do anything.
Russia is still a shadow of its former self. If you compare Russia as of now and the USSR of the early 1980s, then it is clear. The USSR had a population of close to 300 million, and their armed forces were as powerful as that of the United States. Now if you look at Russia, it is having a population of only around 145 million, and the armed forces are clearly inferior to that of the Americans. That said, their resurgence after 1999, when Putin took over has been nothing short of a miracle.
April 26, 2017, 04:52:39 AM
Russia wants to appear to be a world power, though I've no fucking idea why as it's a pointless and wasteful role.
To do that I suppose they decide to prop up the cheapest options out there with the most to gain from being given a hand job by them. And it annoys everyone else.
To do that I suppose they decide to prop up the cheapest options out there with the most to gain from being given a hand job by them. And it annoys everyone else.
Russia does not want to seem like a world power, and it is a strong world power led by a powerful ruler. And it really annoys everyone, but they can not do anything.
Russia is still a shadow of its former self. If you compare Russia as of now and the USSR of the early 1980s, then it is clear. The USSR had a population of close to 300 million, and their armed forces were as powerful as that of the United States. Now if you look at Russia, it is having a population of only around 145 million, and the armed forces are clearly inferior to that of the Americans. That said, their resurgence after 1999, when Putin took over has been nothing short of a miracle.
April 26, 2017, 04:39:50 AM
Russia wants to appear to be a world power, though I've no fucking idea why as it's a pointless and wasteful role.
To do that I suppose they decide to prop up the cheapest options out there with the most to gain from being given a hand job by them. And it annoys everyone else.
To do that I suppose they decide to prop up the cheapest options out there with the most to gain from being given a hand job by them. And it annoys everyone else.
Russia does not want to seem like a world power, and it is a strong world power led by a powerful ruler. And it really annoys everyone, but they can not do anything.
April 26, 2017, 04:15:38 AM
They should have been overthrown by the locals, and not by the Americans. Who gave the Americans the permission to topple the governments all over the world? They should stop playing the world police.
Lol, the instant they stop making war all over the world, USA is dead.
USA is a just a vampire eating from several corpses at the same time. They need ressources and money from all over the world to support their stupid way of life. They can't allow anyone to even slightly defy them or they'd be completely destroyed by their own stupidity and internal politics.
April 26, 2017, 01:32:18 AM
Russia wants to appear to be a world power, though I've no fucking idea why as it's a pointless and wasteful role.
To do that I suppose they decide to prop up the cheapest options out there with the most to gain from being given a hand job by them. And it annoys everyone else.
To do that I suppose they decide to prop up the cheapest options out there with the most to gain from being given a hand job by them. And it annoys everyone else.
If the Russians know that their country is shit, and they are the poor slaves that will lead to the fact that Putin's throw from the Kremlin. He is very afraid and therefore tries to maintain the myth about the greatness of Russia.
It would be sad if true. From going to stars to that...
April 26, 2017, 12:47:00 AM
And today Russia has no American troops on its border? The Russians themselves are to blame. Not only do they attack their neighbors, but also constantly provoke the West. For this reason, it turns out everything is just the opposite.
Russia has American troops on its borders, especially in Finland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. But Russia has not invaded any of these nations. And regarding Ukraine, there was no Russian invasion. There is an ongoing civil war between the Westerners and the Easterners, and Russia is not directly involved.
April 25, 2017, 03:45:23 PM
If the Russians know that their country is shit, and they are the poor slaves that will lead to the fact that Putin's throw from the Kremlin. He is very afraid and therefore tries to maintain the myth about the greatness of Russia.
April 25, 2017, 03:40:27 PM
Russia wants to appear to be a world power, though I've no fucking idea why as it's a pointless and wasteful role.
To do that I suppose they decide to prop up the cheapest options out there with the most to gain from being given a hand job by them. And it annoys everyone else.
To do that I suppose they decide to prop up the cheapest options out there with the most to gain from being given a hand job by them. And it annoys everyone else.
April 25, 2017, 03:38:23 PM
Russia used to make friends with other socialist countries. They smuggled weapons to Vietnam, sold their old ships to China, and now they're trying to help Kim stand his ground.
It's understandable that they don't want to allow USA to tip the balance of power. Kim is one of the few people crazy enough to attack USA and that would be an opportunity for Putin.
Who knows what he's planning, I'd expect an annexation of Ukraine or something like that.
It's understandable that they don't want to allow USA to tip the balance of power. Kim is one of the few people crazy enough to attack USA and that would be an opportunity for Putin.
Who knows what he's planning, I'd expect an annexation of Ukraine or something like that.
Russia and China don't want any more American military bases on their borders, and that is the only reason why they are supporting Kim Jong Un. How would the Americans feel, if Russia sets up military bases along the US-Mexican border?
April 25, 2017, 03:33:42 PM
In the past, Russia has supported Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, and Bashar al Assad. On each of these occasions, they were proven right. After the fall of Gaddafi, Libya became a paradise for human smugglers. And when Saddam was ousted, he was replaced by Abu Bakr al Baghdadi. Now the Americans are trying to topple Bashar al Assad, fully knowing that the ISIS will replace him.
Sigh. And America has also supported dictators in the past, remember when dictatorships like Marcos were rampant during the Cold War era? And that only to stop the spread of communism. Russia and US basically played Earth like a chessboard those days.
There was no denying Saddam was horrible... how many times has he tried invading his neighbors? I'm not sure about Gaddaffi but he probably also did some horrible stuff to some people there (he did provide them education and internet, and that was his downfall). But however horrible they may be, they kept all these radicals in check and whatever troubles they have usually stayed within their borders.
I agree they should have been replaced, but more gradually, with enough time for democratic institutions to built up first..
They should have been overthrown by the locals, and not by the Americans. Who gave the Americans the permission to topple the governments all over the world? They should stop playing the world police.
It's like locals can do anything. Even in China, they'll just take you if you're a dissident. It's not like the people there can do anything without outside intervention. This is where China and America come in. It is to America's benefit that there is no dictator there threatening to nuke everything. It is to China's benefit that their neighbor don't get embroiled in nasty, if not radioactive, war.
Best option without needing anyone to invade someone? Regime change. Just kick fat Mickey out and replace him with a more docile leader. Since the regime's policy of deifying eternal grampa Kim probably already got up people's brains, they would need to select from the Kim family. Mickey probably already realized this as he has already started killing relatives.
April 21, 2017, 11:23:05 PM
Russia used to make friends with other socialist countries. They smuggled weapons to Vietnam, sold their old ships to China, and now they're trying to help Kim stand his ground.
It's understandable that they don't want to allow USA to tip the balance of power. Kim is one of the few people crazy enough to attack USA and that would be an opportunity for Putin.
Who knows what he's planning, I'd expect an annexation of Ukraine or something like that.
It's understandable that they don't want to allow USA to tip the balance of power. Kim is one of the few people crazy enough to attack USA and that would be an opportunity for Putin.
Who knows what he's planning, I'd expect an annexation of Ukraine or something like that.
Russia and China don't want any more American military bases on their borders, and that is the only reason why they are supporting Kim Jong Un. How would the Americans feel, if Russia sets up military bases along the US-Mexican border?
April 21, 2017, 07:14:16 PM
i don't see koreans sailing around the world dropping bombs on a new country every other month for no good reason. the dprk isn't bothering anyone and neither for that matter are the other nations jewmerica labels as "bad guys" such as syria iran or the palestinians. it is only in the minds of brainwashed westerners that they are the aggressors.
April 21, 2017, 04:51:16 PM
Russia used to make friends with other socialist countries. They smuggled weapons to Vietnam, sold their old ships to China, and now they're trying to help Kim stand his ground.
It's understandable that they don't want to allow USA to tip the balance of power. Kim is one of the few people crazy enough to attack USA and that would be an opportunity for Putin.
Who knows what he's planning, I'd expect an annexation of Ukraine or something like that.
It's understandable that they don't want to allow USA to tip the balance of power. Kim is one of the few people crazy enough to attack USA and that would be an opportunity for Putin.
Who knows what he's planning, I'd expect an annexation of Ukraine or something like that.
April 21, 2017, 03:26:07 PM
It's obvious that Putin wants to restore old Russian empire or USSR.
He is doing everything in his power to keep control over the territory of the former USSR, ruining governments that oppose him, like in Ukraine or Georgia, and supporting friendly governments in Belarus, for example.
North Korea, Libya, Iraq, Syria etc. for Putin are just chess figures, in his game for global power and dominance.
Putin also using natural resources, like oil and gas, in order to dominate Europe and other countries.
Putin don't care about nuclear weapons in North Korea.
For him is only important to create as many problems as possible to America, so that he can have more freedom to do what he wants in other countries.
He is doing everything in his power to keep control over the territory of the former USSR, ruining governments that oppose him, like in Ukraine or Georgia, and supporting friendly governments in Belarus, for example.
North Korea, Libya, Iraq, Syria etc. for Putin are just chess figures, in his game for global power and dominance.
Putin also using natural resources, like oil and gas, in order to dominate Europe and other countries.
Putin don't care about nuclear weapons in North Korea.
For him is only important to create as many problems as possible to America, so that he can have more freedom to do what he wants in other countries.
April 20, 2017, 09:59:26 PM
In the past, Russia has supported Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, and Bashar al Assad. On each of these occasions, they were proven right. After the fall of Gaddafi, Libya became a paradise for human smugglers. And when Saddam was ousted, he was replaced by Abu Bakr al Baghdadi. Now the Americans are trying to topple Bashar al Assad, fully knowing that the ISIS will replace him.
Sigh. And America has also supported dictators in the past, remember when dictatorships like Marcos were rampant during the Cold War era? And that only to stop the spread of communism. Russia and US basically played Earth like a chessboard those days.
There was no denying Saddam was horrible... how many times has he tried invading his neighbors? I'm not sure about Gaddaffi but he probably also did some horrible stuff to some people there (he did provide them education and internet, and that was his downfall). But however horrible they may be, they kept all these radicals in check and whatever troubles they have usually stayed within their borders.
I agree they should have been replaced, but more gradually, with enough time for democratic institutions to built up first..
They should have been overthrown by the locals, and not by the Americans. Who gave the Americans the permission to topple the governments all over the world? They should stop playing the world police.
April 20, 2017, 12:38:49 PM
In the past, Russia has supported Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, and Bashar al Assad. On each of these occasions, they were proven right. After the fall of Gaddafi, Libya became a paradise for human smugglers. And when Saddam was ousted, he was replaced by Abu Bakr al Baghdadi. Now the Americans are trying to topple Bashar al Assad, fully knowing that the ISIS will replace him.
Sigh. And America has also supported dictators in the past, remember when dictatorships like Marcos were rampant during the Cold War era? And that only to stop the spread of communism. Russia and US basically played Earth like a chessboard those days.
There was no denying Saddam was horrible... how many times has he tried invading his neighbors? I'm not sure about Gaddaffi but he probably also did some horrible stuff to some people there (he did provide them education and internet, and that was his downfall). But however horrible they may be, they kept all these radicals in check and whatever troubles they have usually stayed within their borders.
I agree they should have been replaced, but more gradually, with enough time for democratic institutions to built up first..
April 20, 2017, 11:01:57 AM
In the past, Russia has supported Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, and Bashar al Assad. On each of these occasions, they were proven right. After the fall of Gaddafi, Libya became a paradise for human smugglers. And when Saddam was ousted, he was replaced by Abu Bakr al Baghdadi. Now the Americans are trying to topple Bashar al Assad, fully knowing that the ISIS will replace him.
April 20, 2017, 10:54:27 AM
Even China is already getting tired of Kim's antics. After all, they're neighbors and it's always irritating when they make so much noise. Especially if that noise is the sound of nukes going off.
And still in all these, Russia is still a friend. Maybe they just haven't realized the weight of the matter. At least Assad don't have nukes. We all know they are all playing the big game but that shouldn't blind them to the overall effects.
More likely that change in NoKor would be coming from China rather than Russia. A less belligerent regime would be beneficial to the region but at the same time China wouldn't want a pro-American gov't in NoKor.
The answer is simple; The enemy of my enemy is my friend, dude!
This is true in whatever scale.
And still in all these, Russia is still a friend. Maybe they just haven't realized the weight of the matter. At least Assad don't have nukes. We all know they are all playing the big game but that shouldn't blind them to the overall effects.
More likely that change in NoKor would be coming from China rather than Russia. A less belligerent regime would be beneficial to the region but at the same time China wouldn't want a pro-American gov't in NoKor.
The answer is simple; The enemy of my enemy is my friend, dude!
This is true in whatever scale.
April 20, 2017, 10:42:04 AM
Again! Quaddafi, bashar, kim... how lower can lavrov and his master go?
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/russia-blocks-u-n-statement-condemning-north-korea-despite-chinese-support/
And flying bombers near alaska... going very rogue they are. They seem to believe that trump and the troompallas are palacebuffons. They may be right (about the trumpies).
Now it's simple, become a dictator in your country of birth (soverignty is dear to russians), kill your opponents (chemicalless) and be supported fully by russia (as long as the putinists are alive).
Time to look in africa for lavrov team, lot of cooperation and mutual agreements to sign!
What a shame...
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/russia-blocks-u-n-statement-condemning-north-korea-despite-chinese-support/
And flying bombers near alaska... going very rogue they are. They seem to believe that trump and the troompallas are palacebuffons. They may be right (about the trumpies).
Now it's simple, become a dictator in your country of birth (soverignty is dear to russians), kill your opponents (chemicalless) and be supported fully by russia (as long as the putinists are alive).
Time to look in africa for lavrov team, lot of cooperation and mutual agreements to sign!
What a shame...
The answer is simple; The enemy of my enemy is my friend, dude!
April 20, 2017, 10:33:49 AM
It's all about the power like Russia had to support Assad in Syria after CIA created ISIS.
April 20, 2017, 09:42:38 AM
Again! Quaddafi, bashar, kim... how lower can lavrov and his master go?
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/russia-blocks-u-n-statement-condemning-north-korea-despite-chinese-support/
And flying bombers near alaska... going very rogue they are. They seem to believe that trump and the troompallas are palacebuffons. They may be right (about the trumpies).
Now it's simple, become a dictator in your country of birth (soverignty is dear to russians), kill your opponents (chemicalless) and be supported fully by russia (as long as the putinists are alive).
Time to look in africa for lavrov team, lot of cooperation and mutual agreements to sign!
What a shame...
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/russia-blocks-u-n-statement-condemning-north-korea-despite-chinese-support/
And flying bombers near alaska... going very rogue they are. They seem to believe that trump and the troompallas are palacebuffons. They may be right (about the trumpies).
Now it's simple, become a dictator in your country of birth (soverignty is dear to russians), kill your opponents (chemicalless) and be supported fully by russia (as long as the putinists are alive).
Time to look in africa for lavrov team, lot of cooperation and mutual agreements to sign!
What a shame...
The answer is simple; The enemy of my enemy is my friend, dude!
April 20, 2017, 08:22:12 AM
Again! Quaddafi, bashar, kim... how lower can lavrov and his master go?
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/russia-blocks-u-n-statement-condemning-north-korea-despite-chinese-support/
And flying bombers near alaska... going very rogue they are. They seem to believe that trump and the troompallas are palacebuffons. They may be right (about the trumpies).
Now it's simple, become a dictator in your country of birth (soverignty is dear to russians), kill your opponents (chemicalless) and be supported fully by russia (as long as the putinists are alive).
Time to look in africa for lavrov team, lot of cooperation and mutual agreements to sign!
What a shame...
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/russia-blocks-u-n-statement-condemning-north-korea-despite-chinese-support/
And flying bombers near alaska... going very rogue they are. They seem to believe that trump and the troompallas are palacebuffons. They may be right (about the trumpies).
Now it's simple, become a dictator in your country of birth (soverignty is dear to russians), kill your opponents (chemicalless) and be supported fully by russia (as long as the putinists are alive).
Time to look in africa for lavrov team, lot of cooperation and mutual agreements to sign!
What a shame...
Jump to: