Hi Saig
Not sure if you've seen the novablitz ICO? There's not many I've seen where you don't have to pay to play - as in commit buy a large amount pre ICO.
I'd love to see more ICO's doing it teh way Novablitz have - minimum buy of 0.1 - I think this way opens it up to a lot more "ordinary" people, which is the way, in my opinion, all cryptocoins hould work - not just playing to the big guys (and girls) who have lots of funds already. Add in the bonuses and it has a good feel to me. Of course people can buy lots and get extra bonuses and I don't disagree with that - it's just nice to see one that I can get involved with for once.
More information on their site at https://novablitz.com and very friendly in their chat at https://t.me/Novablitz
Thanks
Dave
Topic: Why is this new random coin ICO interesting? (Read 197 times)
Independent reviews can be helpful when choosing which ICO to invest in will join your channel.
We agree that most ICO calenders and sites are pay to play style. It's sad, but can't expect anything for free. We have refused to pay these sites to 'Feature' our ICO and have done well so far. Hope your channel grows!
Im looking for interesting coins not yet listed on exchanges but the ones just announced or currently raising funds...
Sounds like an interesting idea! Not all good ICO projects have huge marketing budgets so fair analytical opinions would be worthwhile. We'll check it out!
Hi guys,
We have been studying the market for a while and decided to test one of our assumptions. Most of the platforms to announce ICOs are either paid or have a paid version to feature an ICO.
That leads to a big bias in perception of value - especially for those who don't know about that simple fact. Even rating ones do the same...
We have decided to do an analysis of interesting ICOs but not based on their paid marketing. So far, we have done two examples testing the content and the response has been positive.
We want to give a short and actionable insight on why an ICO is interesting (to invest or to follow) or not at all - without become financial advice - just personal, meticulous analysis and opinion of our own based on our own index.
You can check it out here: https://t.me/ICO_Signal
We have been studying the market for a while and decided to test one of our assumptions. Most of the platforms to announce ICOs are either paid or have a paid version to feature an ICO.
That leads to a big bias in perception of value - especially for those who don't know about that simple fact. Even rating ones do the same...
We have decided to do an analysis of interesting ICOs but not based on their paid marketing. So far, we have done two examples testing the content and the response has been positive.
We want to give a short and actionable insight on why an ICO is interesting (to invest or to follow) or not at all - without become financial advice - just personal, meticulous analysis and opinion of our own based on our own index.
You can check it out here: https://t.me/ICO_Signal
Jump to: