Why Isn’t Resveratrol Being Used After Every Heart Attack, & In All Cases of Angina Chest Pain With Or Without Coronary Artery Stent?
The use of a coronary artery stent may sometimes be worse than the patient’s disease. The history of coronary artery stenting is one of presumed effectiveness. Stent-induced heart attacks and deaths have plagued this widely practiced intervention since its inception.
Since 1986 when the first stent (a cylindrical metallic wire device to prop open narrowing arteries that supply the heart to oxygenated blood) was implanted, it was presumed these implants were obviously effective. The Food & Drug Administration didn’t officially approve of these devices till 1994.
Given that stents do not address the cause of coronary artery disease, it is not surprising to learn of their many drawbacks.
The need for stents became apparent after balloon angioplasty that involves the insertion of a wire with a balloon tip into coronary arteries. The balloon is inflated to break up a clot in a narrowed artery. Following balloon angioplasty, rebound occlusion occurred in 5-10% of patients within minutes to hours immediately following the procedure.
Today many stents are placed in coronary arteries solely based upon symptoms of sometimes incapacitating chest pain (angina).
Stents do not completely eliminate re-stenosis, that is, recurrence of arterial narrowing, and in-stent closure or collapse is reported. In fact, within-stent narrowing (re-stenosis) is as high as 20-30% of treated cases of angina.
Read more and check out the links. And read the article to find out what Resveratrol is, and how it can help.