why not you ban yourself? 
Topic: Why Negative trust for Spaming ? Why not BAN them ? (Read 267 times)
you'll be ban too. you just like others spamming threads with nonsense post why not you ban yourself?
why not you ban yourself? Why are DT members (Lunda / Pharmist / Actmyname) only giving Red Trust to members for spamming ?
They can still spam after getting -ive trust.
Why Not Permanent Ban them to kill the Shit all at once ?
They can still spam after getting -ive trust.
Why Not Permanent Ban them to kill the Shit all at once ?
Lunda?
he/she is from mars. But anyways i will exclude lauda on that list since those two names listed who are pharmacist and actmyname is creating trouble here now. They tag people with ungood manners. To be fair , you need to remove yourself from moonlight campaign as otherwise it will be a biased selection.
How about the following: I could give him a permanent spot in any of my campaigns. Therefore, he can not be biased as he is never in competition for a spot with anyone.? 
that is a genius idea lauda. i see that is already happened to the pharmacist as he nows a member of chipmixer because darkstar gave him a permenent spot in order to avoid the competition and wont be biased to anyone else. i think darkstar did a good job there to help stop the evil of the pharmacist or maybe not? And maybe pharmacist will still continue his good deeds?
To be fair , you need to remove yourself from moonlight campaign as otherwise it will be a biased selection.
How about the following: I could give him a permanent spot in any of my campaigns. Therefore, he can not be biased as he is never in competition for a spot with anyone.? 
Usually, people will only spam the forum on order to boost multiple accounts for the sake of participating in signature or bounty campaigns. When a DT member tags one of these accounts, they lose their eligibility for most of these campaigns, and hence will usually stop posting (and probably create new accounts).
However, if a moderator sees accounts genuinely spamming referral links, creating useless backlinks and copy-pasting replies for the sake of boosting their post count, then they will probably receive a full ban. Having multiple accounts is not against the rules, but shitposting with multiple accounts is definitely not tolerated.
However, if a moderator sees accounts genuinely spamming referral links, creating useless backlinks and copy-pasting replies for the sake of boosting their post count, then they will probably receive a full ban. Having multiple accounts is not against the rules, but shitposting with multiple accounts is definitely not tolerated.
Banning spammers would actually be better than tagging them with negative trust. Honestly, you are just showing why we need to take such drastic measures to reduce the spam on the forum. There wouldn't be any need to tag users if the forum were more heavily moderated. I gain no benefit from tagging users—in fact I wouldn't really want to, considering the inbox pileup I recently got.
It seems that the argument is always that DT members are sending out negative feedback in order to secure campaign spots. That doesn't make much sense considering the ones we're currently in as opposed to the ones that the spammers we're tagging in. Unless you think that we have the time to tag and post on multiple accounts, it's simply illogical.
Goading us into posting is not going to get you anywhere, is it?
It seems that the argument is always that DT members are sending out negative feedback in order to secure campaign spots. That doesn't make much sense considering the ones we're currently in as opposed to the ones that the spammers we're tagging in. Unless you think that we have the time to tag and post on multiple accounts, it's simply illogical.
Goading us into posting is not going to get you anywhere, is it?
To be fair , you need to remove yourself from moonlight campaign as otherwise it will be a biased selection.
You are a umpire , have you ever seen umpire playing also and making the desion also .
You are doing great but to be neutral don’t join any campiagns yourself.
Banning spammers would actually be better than tagging them with negative trust. Honestly, you are just showing why we need to take such drastic measures to reduce the spam on the forum. There wouldn't be any need to tag users if the forum were more heavily moderated. I gain no benefit from tagging users—in fact I wouldn't really want to, considering the inbox pileup I recently got.
It seems that the argument is always that DT members are sending out negative feedback in order to secure campaign spots. That doesn't make much sense considering the ones we're currently in as opposed to the ones that the spammers we're tagging in. Unless you think that we have the time to tag and post on multiple accounts, it's simply illogical.
Goading us into posting is not going to get you anywhere, is it?
It seems that the argument is always that DT members are sending out negative feedback in order to secure campaign spots. That doesn't make much sense considering the ones we're currently in as opposed to the ones that the spammers we're tagging in. Unless you think that we have the time to tag and post on multiple accounts, it's simply illogical.
Goading us into posting is not going to get you anywhere, is it?
I know all this. I am waiting from these 3 members to reply me to my newly created this thread.
This is just in other way telling them to BAN also to feed their day... lolz
They wished they had those rights too of Baning
Finally lunda is Landa . The Cat
Instead of bitcointalk, you need to spend more time at https://www.reddit.com/r/EnglishLearning
Neither landa nor lunda are in DT list.
You need to work on your spellings too.
Stop being a pleb and work on things that matters.Don't waste your only life here for a few quick bucks.
Good luck!
Lauda DOX'ed? XD
Thank you . We should move ahead without wasting time on Linda , the DT member
Who's lunda?
Are there people on the forum who do not Lauda?! Well, coming back to the main topic, you can report to moderator yourself when you see such a spammer and moderator will take a division what to do. But yes, do not make your head busy with such spammers, better look for your own member's quality
I know all this. I am waiting from these 3 members to reply me to my newly created this thread.
This is just in other way telling them to BAN also to feed their day... lolz
They wished they had those rights too of Baning
Finally lunda is Landa . The Cat
Instead of bitcointalk, you need to spend more time at https://www.reddit.com/r/EnglishLearning
Neither landa nor lunda are in DT list.
You need to work on your spellings too.
Stop being a pleb and work on things that matters.Don't waste your only life here for a few quick bucks.
Good luck!
Lauda DOX'ed? XD
Only moderators can ban someone.
They are from the DT list.Campaigns don't hire accounts which are tagged by DT1,DT2 list members.
.
You are oblivious of such a simple fact, even after making 422 posts.Strange.
They are from the DT list.Campaigns don't hire accounts which are tagged by DT1,DT2 list members.
.
You are oblivious of such a simple fact, even after making 422 posts.Strange.
DT members (Lunda / Pharmist / Actmyname)
Who's lunda?I know all this. I am waiting from these 3 members to reply me to my newly created this thread.
This is just in other way telling them to BAN also to feed their day... lolz
They wished they had those rights too of Baning
Finally lunda is Landa . The Cat
Only moderators can ban someone.
They are from the DT list.Campaigns don't hire accounts which are tagged by DT1,DT2 list members.
.
You are oblivious of such a simple fact, even after making 422 posts.Strange.
They are from the DT list.Campaigns don't hire accounts which are tagged by DT1,DT2 list members.
.
You are oblivious of such a simple fact, even after making 422 posts.Strange.
DT members (Lunda / Pharmist / Actmyname)
Who's lunda?
Why are DT members (Lunda / Pharmist / Actmyname) only giving Red Trust to members for spamming ?
They can still spam after getting -ive trust.
Why Not Permanent Ban them to kill the Shit all at once ?
They can still spam after getting -ive trust.
Why Not Permanent Ban them to kill the Shit all at once ?
Jump to: