Hi, Hibryda here (I registered after my colleague posted my articles here),
Actually I did what I could to show the community of theDAO all the deficiencies in code, logic and legal side (I wrote loads about legal side of this enterprise, see this thread on daohub - filter for Hibryda posts). This DAMN project, while being interesting, disregarded obvious deficiencies of smart contract, for example now so prominent intent/code discrepancy. But as I stated there are also more fundamental issues, with Solidity in particular.
It's even good that Pamela's project was shot down, as setting a house on dunes usually results in collapse. Nevertheless I think that DAMN is a prospective idea and if asked I can consider helping it.
Actually I did what I could to show the community of theDAO all the deficiencies in code, logic and legal side (I wrote loads about legal side of this enterprise, see this thread on daohub - filter for Hibryda posts). This DAMN project, while being interesting, disregarded obvious deficiencies of smart contract, for example now so prominent intent/code discrepancy. But as I stated there are also more fundamental issues, with Solidity in particular.
It's even good that Pamela's project was shot down, as setting a house on dunes usually results in collapse. Nevertheless I think that DAMN is a prospective idea and if asked I can consider helping it.
Thanks for your fill-in. It certainly explains why I wrote her via Email & didn't get a response. I thought I was being ignored as usual.
