Topic: Why was my post unfairly deleted? (Read 1086 times)

I apologize if you have any issues with the way I word myself or comment on a topic, but I do recall of my posts still being very much on topic, long, and constructive so I just don't know what to say here.

No. You posted right before I made that quote and didn't see the post so I apologize. I didn't know "double posting" was against any rules as there are no official ones anyway. I will try to watch it. My mistake.

Kidding? This very thread, right about my post.
http://archive.is/qpFIS#60%

---

Yes. Also, check what xetsr wrote on the page earlier:

Wrong.Your posts are vague,absurd,forced to look like its on topic.For example :

Topic : Valve is about to accept bitcoin as their payment system

Your answer : It's not a big deal to me. There's tons of people accepting it nowadays.
^Wow,every creative,totally on topic.Contributes to the topic like never before .And ton's of people ? Seriously ?

Example 2: How to motivate women to use Bitcoin?

Your answer : Whether a man occupys BTC or a woman does, it is not going to matter.
^well then ,what matters ?And matters to bitcoin as in what ? or How ?

Example 3 : What would be Satoshi's opinion on blocksize debate ?

Your answer : He wouldn't have an opinion to share as he is rather anonymous and keeps to himself now.
^wtf did I just read ? You have no idea what you're talking about, Do you ?

You're correct,this is not Signature Spamming,this shit is full retards,completely other level stuff.

From what I can make out ,
1.You have no idea what bitcoin is or how it works.
2.You are simply posting for increasing your post counts without a slightest clue what it really means.
3.Stop focusing on Meta activities,hit yourself with the bitcoin documentation,maybe then you can bleed some legit bitcoin related posts .

Prove where I have double posted recently via capture webpage please.

I don't, I'm managing some myself.

Nice attitude, mate.

---

Still, you shouldn't double-post.

No, I did not. They are long posts, with thought involved. Grue said as long as it's on topic, and effort is in your post then everything is within the rules. In all honesty, if you have issues with me, I don't understand why. Also, if people have issues with signatures in general, don't have them. It doesn't make sense to have this tool where people like yourself get paranoid about a "signature spammer", even when a majority of my posts are long, and on topic.

I've reported OP to hilarious some time ago.
I'm surprised they are still part of the YoBit campaign.

Many of your long posts are even worse, same waffly nonsense repeated many times over.

Here is another example:

https://archive.is/xSuAO#selection-809.0-1469.113

You made 10 posts in less than 14 minutes. There is no chance you could have read the OP and at least a few preceding replies to grasp the context and make a constructive contribution in less than 90 seconds on average. At best you just looked at the thread title and fired away. Multiple examples like that in your post history, along with necro posting etc.

That's your opinion. I'm not going to really take opinions from people who cannot voice opinions in a polite manner, call people foolish, stupid, and other rude comments. It's also difficult to tell when multiple accounts controlled by the same person trying to make their arguments towards other people plausible by supporting themselves in an illusion to make it seem like more people respect that opinion and agree with it.

Its pretty obvious why you post in this manner and continuing on this thread after no one has agreed with you seems a bit foolish.
Learn to take criticism or you are going to have a rough go of things here. You may think you are right but the majority has spoken and you need to come to grips with that.
If you do not want to be seen as a signature spammer you should learn how to respond to people in one thread,rather then multiple back to back posts in one thread. It looks like a attempt to boost the post count rather than actually get to the heart of anything.

I'm laying the posts out to make them more noticeable, and less confusing as to what is referring to what. Please tell me where it is against the rules to make "double posts". Doesn't matter anyway. I put everything in the OP.

Might wanna use the edit button instead of double triple posting, unless you're trying to get posts deleted.

No as it is not accurate. You highlight 2 sentenced posts but fail to realize that just as grue said, 2 sentence long posts don't mean your post is necessarily nonconstructive. Making your posts longer don't magically make them constructive either. You also fail to highlight the many long paragraph posts I've made on that same exact page.

I do remember. I didn't edit the screenshot, why would I?

I also reported a few of your posts that were complete bullshit, spam, off topic, etc. Even in this thread you're asking a question that you won't accept any reasonable answer for. With behavior like that you're in no position to demand "proof".

If you really intend to contribute to the forum - stop wall-quoting, stop multi-posting, stop pretending you know things you have no clue about, stop derailing threads, stop posting paragraphs of nothing, stop getting offended when someone disagrees with you, basically stop being such a blindingly obvious trollspammer.

---

https://archive.is/xSuAO#selection-1441.1-1751.66

Good enough for you?

I dont care if you dont get it. You asked for it, here is my reply.

So you say suchmoon photoshopped the pic just to put a stamp on you? Yeah seems legit.

Dude, just move on.  I've had a number of posts deleted recently, and yep they don't give you a reason.  Mine I thought were pretty on-topic and they weren't trolling.  Eh.  As long as I'm not banned, I can deal with a few posts nuked here and there.  My advice is just accept it--every mod here can be different in their views.

If you don't care, you don't have to post. Problem solved. Also, my posts in my history are not one liners or posts with no effort specifically. In the future, please web capture pages to solidify arguments as pages can easily be photoshopped/edited. Thank you.

I value suchmoons word and what i saw more than your claim. Belive it or not. I dont care.

Edit: i decided other. Check your posts here https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/pakistanhockeyfan-706662

Still, no proof. I see no proof anywhere as nothing was captured. Screencaps that could have been edited are not proof to me. I simply don't remember.


As for a deleted "long" post, I don't know if I made it or not because there is no captured webpage to prove anything. I do not recall. I apologize of any inconvenience this may cause.

You got caught. Not the first time. End of story. Stop spamming shit. Thats it.

Edit: the deleted one seems longer. Have to admit this

I said via capture site. Not a screencap that could, or could not be edited. I have no memory of this to be fairly real and that's why I asked for a captured page to solidify your argument. Posting a certain amount of times per day anyway isn't against any rules. In fact, their aren't any solid rules here. There are unofficial ones, with a guide saying moderators can do as they wish with posts without following any code of conduct which is referred in the unofficial rule that moderators will interpret rules however they please which gives flexible leeway to come up with rules on the spot if they wish.

Here we go https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14287173

Give proof of that via capture site, and be sure to read my edit in the other post.


I'm not really sure what the problem behind me asking a question as to why a post was deleted constitutes as me being a troll. Again in regards to signature campaigns, take them away and the option cannot be possibly abused. Even though in this specific case, I was yet to be given proof that I abused campaigns anyway.

I posted in one the threads on your spree last week. You pushed nearly 10 posts in meta.

Because one line is off topic doesn't constitute for the post itself to be considered 100% off topic. I don't know. To be honest, I don't really feel like arguing for too long, but I still have my right to ask questions for better understanding of choices being made. I'm sorry that you probably don't feel that way.

because you tend to post in a lot of topics, some older some not, mostly empty 2 liners, sometimes in a row, one can think because of your sig...

This bolded part is off topic.

It was clearly off topic the thread you mention at start. The thread was about trolling and you slowly turned it in to how you felt about mods. Its like what you are attempting to do with your own thread by mentioning being harassed by multiple accounts owned by one person. Its just on and on with you and that is why people are suspicious of the manner you post.

Try to keep to one issue,it might help you real in any issue and stamp it out.

I'm not playing victim. Asking for an explanation isn't playing a victim role. Also, if signature campaigns are wrong, don't have them in the first place because I don't just post to get signature coins. I will have an opinion if I wish to have them as long as I voice openly, honestly, and politely as possible.

In addition of response to how posts function here, occupying multiple accounts for harassment or to support a post a user makes shouldn't be allowed as it gives a false view of how many people actually support an opinion.

You have a way of posting that comes across as insincere and mainly posting for signature payments and subtle trolling.
This post as QS has pointed out is off topic and you are creating a false drama to push up the posts. Have seen posts about you spamming and you may need to look into how you engage this community.

The victim role only goes so far before people tune you out and just gloss over what you bring to the discussion.

I don't see anything in your post that had anything to do with the OP of the thread you posted in.

It wasn't completely off topic though. At the beginning, I started it off as a response to the other post, but it was still rather on topic.

It was off topic. It was a reply to another thread, which was locked.

If you wanted to make that statement in said locked thread then you should have sent a message to a moderator to unlock the thread so you can post said message.

Actually, I do see why it's being considered off topic, because the beginning was in regards to another post made. However in this case it wasn't completely off topic. The topic was about trolling. It was also a response to a moderator saying moderators can have that opportunity to be rude if need be. I see why it can be seen as off topic, but it's omewhat on topic as it is also in regards to moderators being rude, which was the part mentioned with the sentence " Locking the thread right after getting the last word and advising people to not respond to your post is something I found rather childish in my honest opinion" goes with the theme of a moderator making a troll comment.

The post he quoted was from me which was in commentary of moderators being trolls. So yes, I see why it could have been somewhat off topic, but it could have been discussed. Either way, I'd like to apologize and I'll try to stay on topic more. I just don't think it should have been deleted if it could have been discussed in regards to the thread topic.




Here's the full conversation captured if anyone requires it.

http://archive.is/PzftY




Edit: in this thread, my posts were unfairly deleted yet again. Proof:


http://archive.is/gARiv
http://archive.is/GX7Ec


Here are more incase need be. I'm gonna go ahead and lock this thread now. I don't really have time to argue with anyone.

http://archive.is/PzftY
http://archive.is/u9d75
http://archive.is/0c0bL
http://archive.is/gARiv
http://archive.is/GX7Ec
http://archive.is/QixOf
http://archive.is/4A4TB
http://archive.is/awyqj
http://archive.is/1pyVk
http://archive.is/3UklB
http://archive.is/T3oUh

Regards~