Topic: Why were threads about Stunna recently expunge from this forum and by whom? (Read 322 times)

Please enlighten me as to how it's off topic when the subject is that your sig pertains to a site deemed a scam by others that I'm advancing?

So, if I post that such-and-such is a scam and should be tagged by the mods and it's deleted, then I'm forbidden in ever posting such sentiment ever again? That don't seem fair at all. Exactly where I can read such rule that you cited?

But how do we know for sure that Jeff Ownby and Sonny Vleisides of BFL fame are not behind Stake.com? Recall, the general consensus by others on this forum is that the scammer tag thingy was replaced by the trust thingy so to favor BFL. And all them red trusts given to scammers on this forum are NOT indexed by Google, so nobody outside can see them unless they sign up/login.

My posts were on-topic, adding the deleted posts on both instances as an extra. Am I not allowed to do that?

Speaking of not allowing shit, this ...


I was 100% doxxed my Josh Zerlan, hence having all my vitals revealed, but nothing was even done in spite of trying to stop the action, thus embracing the dox, hence continuing to display my SSN, DLN, etc.

When the smoke cleared, the cocksucker, Josh Zerlan, successfully had a restraining order put on my ass for stalking him, I being the ONLY person involved in the BFL fiasco to be convicted. Go figure.

PSS: I just remember about the time Josh Zipkin threaten to kill me and that even made the rounds on periodicals, but he wasn't banned.

Meanwhile, the plot thickens ...

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5576956

So, prey tell why you promote an entity that even those that aren't versed in crypto consider it a scam?

Proof: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=%22stake.com%22+scam

Probably because every post by the OP in it has been edited to:

I am a nobody but Millions of people have gambled on his casino and nobody ever wondered who he is?

He is here online everyday promoting Full transparency and I would like to know who he is.

Who is Stunna?

The reason that doxxing has been allowed up until now is that it's occasionally very useful in scam investigations. However, oftentimes doxxing someone is used as a weapon in itself instead of a part of any investigation, and as a result innocent people are sometimes hurt. So to protect the innocent while hopefully not hampering scam investigations too much, here are some new rules on doxxing:

1. Personal information must be confined to the new "investigations" board (under Scam Accusations), which is only visible to Members and above. Personal information is defined as anything which links a user's online identity (username, email, etc.) to their meatspace identity, excluding links that the person himself has posted. It is not allowed to post somebody's personal information in any other public place, including in signatures.
2. It is not allowed to post someone's dox if it is especially obvious that you're just using the dox as a weapon. For example, if there are no remotely-plausible trade complaints, then the person can't be a scammer, and their dox should not be posted.
3. As before, anything that the legacy insecure government/banking system requires to be secret is not allowed anywhere. This includes social security numbers, credit card numbers, and certain account numbers.

This applies retroactively to old posts. If a thread contains a lot of personal information strewn throughout it, then the whole thread will be moved to Investigations. If it's only a few posts, then those will be split off. From now on, it's probably a good idea to create two threads for big scammers: one in Scam Accusations and one in Investigations.

From time to time there may be cases where it is very desirable to publish some results of an investigation. For example, if a class action lawsuit is filed, then the person's username should probably at least be publicly linked to the legal case so that other people can join in. For now, there is no uniform policy for this, and if you need to make some personal info public, post in Meta and we will deal with it on a case-by-case basis.

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

So where's the archive of the posts that were deleted? And who put a bug in your ear that a witch hunt was underway?

Probably because every post by the OP in it has been edited to:

Remove thread thanks.

Remove thread thanks.