Accurate observation. The same goes for "licensed" and "regulated" and to some extent even lowest house edge or best odds. In fact, if you stroll through the casinos advertised even on this forum, you'll find some glaring misrepresentations.
I definitely agree that Provably Fair is now the minimum standard. But players do have a rather steep learning curve when it comes to verifying for themselves if the Provably Fair mechanism is as it claims. For the larger sites, there are open-source tools out there to use but that still requires manual verification of each wager made. I admit myself I hardly ever verify my bets at places I already trust, beyond the first few I always do when signing up to anew place.
I also hear people can implement systems that looks " Provably Fair ", but once it is tested it turns out that it is rigged. Is this true?
I've seen at least one alleged case, which you can discover for yourself in this forum, where the system apparently would only show the seed if you expressly requested it. It's since been fixed.
This is one area, where we need a White Hat hacker initiative, where knowledgeable people could test these sites to see if their systems are "Provably Fair" or if the house edge is what is promoted on the site. These people should in no way be affiliated with these sites and not be bribed or influenced by these people.
Most people just use these sites and blow away their money on untested claims. Misrepresentations has become the standard now and nobody are challenging these claims. If this continues and consumers are exploited enough, law enforcement will get involved and this scene will get heavily regulated. < Most of them are running their online casinos from countries or independent Islands, where these law enforcement agencies cannot touch them. >
https://www.fairbinaryoptions.com/blacklisted-casinos/I believe there are a number of "decentralized" efforts (sorry, I had to do it!) doing precisely that, even on this forum. I think the gambling community just needs to look out for each other, and to learn a bit of discipline by doing their own research.
As you recognise with bribery and affiliation, at the end of the day, it's difficult to rely on information when there are other agendas. You've got services like Game Protect here who also have their own website and claim to protect players from these "bad casinos" but they hurt their own credibility by also promoting affiliate links.
But I've seen more effective cases here on this forum where casinos are brought up against their claims. Community pressure prevailed in some. Reputation is more powerful than law enforcement here.
Can you please explain how the possibility to qualify cost free for our online gaming consumer protection service has hurt the credibility of Game Protect?
I could understand your claim if GP was affiliated with publicly proven scams, but this is obviously not the case.
While several players signed up with our affiliate links, until today no one was willing to contribute anything to qualify for consumer protection service for his other accounts.
They lose 1000s and in total millions to scams, but they are not willing to contribute anything to enforce their claim! This behaviour is likely caused by the brain wash theories spread on the forums that we can not do anything.
One part are the scams and the shills who promote the scams and the other part are the brain washers to convince the victims that the money is lost, even though the publicly stated laws give fully right to the victims!
Yes when you read the
Online gambling scams! and avoided to deposit to those sites, then you are protected from these "bad casinos".
Alternatively, you can also put "operator + scam" into google, as GP scam articles are usually always on the first page and within the first 3 entries.